Qualitative Research Critique II 2

On reading this article and identifying the study, there was a clear insight on how death and dying, and even improved health, impacted those nurses (Conte, 2014). Nurses, who worked closely with their patients, through the perils and suffering, culminating of death and losses, had grief not readily explored to enable that comfort zone (Conte, 2014).

Qualitative and quantitative research assume an instrumental part in item advancement. Information acquired from the quantitative research incorporate client inclinations, socioeconomics, and advertise measure offers imperative data which is utilized for business basic leadership. Qualitative research gives information which is utilized to the plan of an item, and client prerequisites. Both of the methodologies have qualities and shortcomings which ought to be tended to when doing an exploration procedure. There are advantages which are collected from consolidating the two techniques. Quantitative investigation is communicated in numbers. Information in quantitative research is in numeric frame, so measurable tests are pertinent. The depiction of measurements which can be utilized incorporates standard deviation, mean, and middle. Measurable investigation empowers the specialists to infer huge certainties. In this view, the paper will talk about Qualitative and quantitative research concentrating on their focal points and inconveniences.

Nurses are responsible in providing holistic, quality care to their clients. In order to effectively provide such care Boswell and Cannon (2009, p. 2 & 7) states that nurses must base their provision of care on the most current, up-to-date health information available and sound nursing knowledge. This is where evidence-based practice (EBP) comes in. Polit and Beck (2010, p. 4) defined EBP as "the use of the best clinical evidence in making patient care desicions". This usually comes from research conducted by nurses and other healthcare professionals. Thus it is pertinent that research reports are critically analyzed.

To answer Research Question 2, the researcher analyzed the responses of childcare staff on the SIS. Wage and program quality data were collected from the Supplemental Information sheet (SIS) created by the researcher (see Appendix B). Two levels of quality were: Level 1 corresponded to state licensing such as acquiring a Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) license; Level 2 corresponded to accreditation from the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC).

The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe how occupational therapists’ involved client-centred activities in daily living (CADL) in their practice. This was done by reviewing the therapist’s experiences and reflections about their interaction with clients that suffered from a stroke. The study involved coding of three categories. These categories included: 1) Sharing an understanding as the point of departure, 2) Sharing through experiences, and 3) Challenges in applying the CADL.

The stated purpose of the article was to evaluate not only pain control in adolescents who underwent a spinal fusion, but also the emotional/psychological and physical affect it had on them. Another stated purpose was to uncover the pre-operation education and preparedness for the surgery. Is it enough to prepare

Ground Rules: Participation in the focus group is voluntary, that it is all right to abstain from discussing specific topics if you are not comfortable, that all responses are valid-there are no right or wrong answers, to please respect the opinions of others even if you do not agree, to speak as openly as you feel comfortable, and avoid revealing very detailed information about your personal health. (University of Massachuetts, nd)

During participant recruitment, participants will be given adequate, relevant and accurate information (Hennink, 2014). This will be reinforced again during the group discussion. This means that they will understand the implications, facts, and outcomes of participating. They will also understand how confidentiality, anonymity and data will be managed how how the results will be disseminated (Wiles, 2013). Participants will be informed that they can chose not to answer any questions if they prefer not to, and have a right to withdraw from participation at any time. Therefore, they will be making informed decision on whether to participate in the focus group. Participants will all be given a written consent form and oral

Flexible and inexpensive, focus groups consist of six to ten participants (Hartman, 2004, p. 408). Additionally, a moderator guides the discussion among its panel members that allows researchers to observe real-time verbal responses and nonverbal cues (Hartman, 2004, p. 402; Cooper & Schindler, 2014, p. 160). Focus groups moderators also have the ability to introduce new ideas to gain a greater understanding of concerns from respondents (Hartman, 2004, p. 402). However, a concern with focus group is the lack of anonymity due to the face-to-face participation.

There were 10 different single-sex focus groups with 6 participants in each group. The groups were set up this way to enhance understanding of the topic and to promote communication within the group. This study clearly defines the roles of researchers in data collection and analysis of the data. The focus groups were 45 minute sessions with two undergrad senior students conducting the group. One student was in charge of using the topic guide to start the discussion, and the other student recording the events of the discussion. The phenomenon under study took place in two different settings. College students met within their institution and students from universities met off-campus. The data obtained in this study were analyzed appropriately. The researchers in the study used a Framework Analysis Approach. In this approach, 2 coders independently separated data into key themes and subthemes. Differences in interpretation of the data were discussed between the two coders. Goundry et. all\ (2013) stated, “a third researcher was available in case of disparities, but none were noted.” During the analytic phase of the study no biases were

One of the strategies not used in this study we the use of group interviews or focus groups. The authors point this fact out in their study indicating that while the results from such interviews would likely add to the evidence of their study, because of the scope of the study this method would need to wait to be utilized in later studies. Limiting the number of uncontrolled variables and not overwhelming the study with multiple research methods that may or may not add to the value of the results at this point seems beneficial and allows room for future

This article represents a focus group type of qualitative research. According to Qualitative Research Consultants Association (2015), in focus group qualitative research, a group of individuals who share a need, life circumstance, or habit relevant to the research issue(s) at hand are led in a discussion by a modulator. The focus group discussions often include between two to ten respondents, and are often held face to face. They can also be conducted remotely through videoconferencing, teleconferencing, or

This research calculated the mean in order to allow comparisons between the two focus groups can be made. The OT and the SALT focus groups are similar in the way that they are both therapists working towards the goal of aiding ASD adult patients at the clinic to become independent. The therapists all have their individual perceptions and opinions about the how to work with ASD adults. In the focus groups the two groups were different because one group had the perspective of occupational therapy and the other had the perspective speech and language therapy. Each of the individual therapists involved in the focus groups were assumed to have different opinions about using electronic communication boards with ASD adults.

The use of focus groups as a qualitative and interpretive method of enquiry comprises of a number of strengths and weaknesses.

First is focus group method, focus group is defined as a group of individuals providing information in a structured format. A moderator leads the group of about 8 to 14 participants through an open, in-depth discussion rather than simply asking questions to solicit participants’ responses. The group is stimulated by comments from other group members in creatively conceptualizing and developing a new