Reliable Sources Of A Scholarly Article

Scholarly paper/article, also called as research and academic paper/article, is published in academic journals and has original research results and shows an entirely new invention. It is generally based on original research or experimentation. It is written by a researcher or expert in the field who is often affiliated with a college or university. According to Svernstrom (2014), the paper/article could be original/review/theoretical work.

For instance: “I don’t limit my 13-year-old’s gaming. Here’s why” Sometimes author even is not named. Second, is about the notes. scholarly journals article usually includes notes and/or bibliographic references. However, popular magazines not. There are not always have lots of example. This suggests that scholarly journals is more respected and serious academic research. By contrast, If you want to do some research or need to find some science-based information, care you best chose. Due to all the information, which be showed in the scholarly journals are validated.

Scholarly books and articles are considered a reliable source of information. So, what are the differences between scholarly sources and popular sources? An example of a popular source is Google, this site has an abundance of information that could be useful in many ways for certain types of research. I have learned from experience that when reading articles from Google they will tend to try and sell you something in the process (Bethel, 2013). Nevertheless, a scholarly source such as the articles that we have access to in the Bethel Library, include content written by experts. Experts can be someone who has a long-term experience in that field of study and perform research to share with others. Consequently, all papers written by experts are

The internet is a quick and easy way to get information; a simple search will bring up endless amounts of information. The problem with having all sorts of information available is that it makes it hard to know if the information truly is credible. The most credible websites are government and university sites and those end with .gov and .edu. Sites that end with .com and .org are purchased by organizations or and individual and can be used to sway their readers in certain directions. Sites that end with .com and .org do not always contain bad information, but may not be as helpful as the government or university sites.

These are sources that had been already published which now can be obtained through different kinds of media such as books, journals, and magazines. Usually researchers will use digital media to access these sources such as using the internet or online journals.

In my opinion, a strong source is also a credible source, so it's important to focus on what makes a source credible, for example, for many disciplines the currency of information is essential (such as computer science).

Primary sources are useful because they are the reports and interpretations of the historians that are closer to the event. Therefore, some of the primary sources that will be most helpful when researching to what extent did the military play a role in the decision to drop the atomic bomb on August 6, 1945. First, I would use the interviews and memos that lead up to the event; I will read some of the interviews that were conducted from sources like Robert Oppenheimer, Stanislaus Ulam, and Kathleen Maxwell, these people are important, because they are the individuals who actually worked on the bomb. I will pull the interviews from the Voices of the Manhattan Project. Then I would like to get into the actual decision and meetings in Potsdam, which will be pulled from a few memos,

4. What is an article? A piece of writing included with others in a newspaper, magazine, or other publication.

Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication 1 | Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). (2003, June 24). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies

Furthermore, the secondary sources illustrate some of the manners in which immigrants attempt to integrate into society, their reasons for coming, and the opposition that they encounter assimilating. First, the source from Social Science Weekly illustrates that most immigrants coming to the United States do in fact want to assimilate by learning the English language, which goes against the misconceptions of the majority. Additionally, another manner in which immigrants attempt to assimilate, highlighted by the article by Stephanie Kotin, Grace Dyrness, and Clara Irazabal, is religion and community activism, which allows immigrants to portray themselves in a positive way to battle the misconceptions of the right majority. The chapter by David

I would also consider Fox News and CNN reliable sources. This again can be accredited to their popularity. That does not mean that popularity equals reliability, but can often times be the case. The reason that popularity and high ranking have a purpose here is due to the seriousness of the subject matter. These news

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. It contains millions of articles and depends mainly on volunteers and contributors to ensure that information are up to date. This is an open source that anyone can add and edit articles; so information may not always be accurate. It is the quickest and easier way to gain general knowledge on a specific topic. An encyclopedia is generally not a good source of reference in a paper; rather it can be a starting point in research the topic. The issue of reliability and credibility arises because of lack of credentials of editors, including biased view in content, articles are not peer-reviewed before publishing, source cited may be invalid,

A source is the place or resource in which knowledge has been obtained. When looking for sources to use in a research paper you need to be able to determine whether or not a source is reliable and credible. It is important to use reliable and credible sources so that the information you use in a document you are writing is accurate and will not affect you in a negative way, by either getting a bad grade in school or just looking unintelligent to a colleague.

Wikipedia houses 40,913,151 articles, which include 5,302,297 written in English, that 1,273 administrators manage (Wikipedia). With these numbers, each administrator would oversee about 32,139 articles. This excruciatingly minute ratio of articles to administrators strongly implies that Wikipedia needs a lot of work to qualify as a quality source. Wikipedia should not qualify as a legitimate research source due to its lack of reputable editing and poor policies. But what criteria qualifies a source as a ‘legitimate’?

In general terms, there are two types of people in terms of scientific competence. To appeal to each type of person, there are similarly two types of scientific writing. For the well-educated scientist, there are scholarly scientific articles which follow a specific form and give immense amounts of information about a specific study executed by other scholars. These types of articles can be used as references in other scholarly articles, and can be used as the basis for the other type of scientific writing: popular science. The majority of people who are interested in scientific study would struggle to comprehend scholarly articles and would prefer not to take the time out of their day to