preview

Removal Of The Lower Impacted Third Molars Case Study

Good Essays

Removal of the lower impacted third molars (L3Ms) is one of the most common procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Numerous indications, such as acute or chronic infection, pain, unrestorable carious lesions, pathology associated with tooth follicle or prevention or repair of periodontal defects in adjacent second molars (L2Ms), have been suggested for surgical extraction of 3Ms.(1) A partially impacted L3M exposed to the oral environment is more susceptible to periodontal infection and thus to greater periodontal attachment loss.(2–5) Similarly, deeply impacted L3Ms often leads to periodontal defects after its surgical removal.(6,7) In this sense, several studies have shown that periodontal healing of the 2Ms after 3M removal is …show more content…

Although two recent meta-analysis have been published on this topic(38,39), they did not assess the entire spectrum of regenerative periodontal therapy techniques. Furthermore, none of these reviews meta-analyzed the safety profile of such procedures and only one admitted comparisons between different types of interventions.(38) Thus, a new systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of all possible regenerative techniques may add further information. The present study aimed to analyze all relevant data from RCTs, to assess which regenerative techniques are most useful for preventing periodontal defects after the extraction of the third molars, and to compare these procedures with the socket’s spontaneous healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS This paper adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration(40) and registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42017078868. Study selection criteria The inclusion criteria were RCTs, including split-mouth designs, which assess the efficacy and/or safety of regenerative periodontal therapy on the periodontal wound healing on the distal site of the L2M molar after L3M removal. The present review excluded trials with less than ten patients in the control and/or intervention group. Baseline parameters and last follow-up visit after regenerative periodontal therapy were used as time points.

Get Access