Research Paper On Stroop Effect

In another study, five experiments were conducted to determine if coloring a single Stroop element reduced automaticity or slowed the processing of a color. The results demonstrated that indeed it slowed processing of congruent and neutral stimuli more than it slows processing of incongruent stimuli (Monahan, 2001).

An interesting challenge arises when a task such as color naming is identified as both controlled and automatic, by varying the other task involved. Color naming is identified as a controlled process when the other task is word reading, but as an automatic process when the other task is shape naming. Cohen, Dunbar and McClelland (1990) proposed an alternative explanation of the Stroop effect, which does not distinguish between automatic and controlled processing. Instead, they proposed that automaticity is a range, and that Stroop interference depends on the relative degree of learning the particular tasks, not on processing speed.

The Stroop effect was tested on four different tasks. Nineteen Queens College students were recruited by flyer, and each were assigned to a word reading task, color reading task, color inhibition task, and word inhibition task. They were timed using a stopwatch function on a cell phone, to name the color, or word to the quickest of their ability. In the order from longest reaction time to shortest: inhibition color naming task, color naming task, inhibition word reading, and word reading. This study shows that people can read words more quickly than they can name colors, and that inhibiting an automatic response to color/word tasks will take longer to do than tasks that do not involve inhibition.

The Stroop experiment by J. Ridley Stroop in 1935 was performed in order to analyze the reaction time of participant’s stimuli and desired results while also obtaining a collective result of color interference and word reading(Stroop, 1935; Lee & Chan, 2000). In the experiment three forms of the test were given, the first consisting of color patches, the second had the color words printed in black and the other was an incongruent test beaming the color did not match the color word

The aim of this experiment is to study autonomic processes by replicating the previously carried out Stroop effect by using numbers. A number of 180 random participants aged in between 18-89 were recruited to participate in this experiment. Participants were presented with a stroop experiment task sheet which consists of three parts which was the control, congruent and incongruent conditions. Time was taken and recorded for each participant to say out the number of stars in the control condition and to say out the number of numbers in the congruent and incongruent conditions. Based on the results, participants took a considerably longer time to say the number of number in the incongruent condition than in the congruent condition.

In 1935 John Ridley Stroop first detailed a phenomenom now known as the “Stroop effect.” This effect has become

The idea of a Stroop Effect may sound ridiculous to someone; however, based on its purpose it may not be. For instance, it is used in clinical studies as way of measuring selective attention, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed and cognitive control. Because of such an experiment, researchers have found that interference to a large extent in brain damage, mental disorder, ADHD (Attention Deficit / Hyperactive Disorder), etc.

Controlled Vs Automatic processes: A modified version of a Stroop experiment using colour-associated and colour neutral words.

In Stroop’s (1935) interference article, it was discovered that there is more interference in color naming then color reading. The experiment described in the article tested whether there was more interference from words or from colors (Stroop 1935). Two tests were administered each with a separate control. The RCNd test determined how fast one could read color names where the color was different from the color name while the NCWd test determined how fast one could name colors where the color was different from the word on the page. The mean time for 100 responses increased from 63.3 seconds on the RCNd test to 110.3 seconds on the NCWd test or an

But still the main focus of the study is on whether occurs and how strong the stroop effect is. The one-tail hypothesis of the study was that the effect will cause a significant delay (or disruption) in guessing the correct colour for the words. Null hypothesis was that there will be not a significant difference between colour-neutral and colour-relevant words.

In psychology, the Stroop effect is a demonstration of interference----prepotent response. In the reaction time of a task. Stroop did an experiment in 35 years. The stimuli he used were in conflict with the colors used in Book 2 and found that when the name of a color (eg, "blue", "green", or "red") Is printed in a color that is not indicated

In 1935, John Ridley Stroop conducted an experiment at George Peabody College for teachers in the United States. Stroop used 70 college undergraduates as subject in his experiment, he compared times for reading names of colours and naming colours themselves. The aim was to determine if the colour of the word affected the ability to read it. In the experiment, there was three different conditions. In the first condition participants were asked to read words as quickly as possible whereas participants had to name the ink colour in which each word were printed as quickly as possible in second condition. In a third condition (the incongruent condition), participants had to name the ink colour in which each word was printed, but in this condition the words themselves were colour names. For example, the word ‘GREEN’ was presented in the colour orange and you were required to read this colour instead of the word itself. Stroop found that the participants were much slower at naming the ink colours when the stimuli were themselves colours as (third condition), indicating that a possible explanation for the Stroop effect is that people quickly and automatically process the meaning of the word.

The topic our group chose to experiment was “the use of the Stroop task while using both English and German as a foreign language”. The goal of our task is to test the limits of our participants’ selective attention. With our goal in mind, we want to be able to see how well our participants can ignore the stimuli of the words themselves as opposed to the ink they are printed in. We hypothesized that our participants would be able to complete the task in the foreign language faster than completing the task printed in English.

The first experiment, which is the primary focus, aimed to see if people’s attention is affected when participants read out a list of colors written in the color it represents and a list of words written in a differing color. ("The aim of the experiment was to see if people's attention is affected by using The Stroop Effect. - GCSE Maths - Marked by Teachers.com") The experiment used 70 undergraduates as participants and had half of the undergraduates read the color of the names printed in black ink then read the color of the names where the color of the print and the word are different.

We are replicating J.R. Stroop’s original experiment The Stroop Effect (Stroop, 1935). The aim of the study was to understand how automatic processing interferes with attempts to attend to sensory information. The independent variable of our experiment was the three conditions, the congruent words, the incongruent words, and the colored squares, and the dependent variable was the time that it took participants to state the ink color of the list of words in each condition. We used repeated measures for the experiment in order to avoid influence of extraneous variables. The participants were 16-17 years of age from Garland High School. The participants will be timed on how long it takes them to say the color of the squares and the color of the words. The research was conducted in the Math Studies class. The participants were aged 16-17 and were students at Garland High School. The results showed that participants took the most time with the incongruent words.