Risks And Opportunities During The Entire Project Life Cycle

risks and determine the likelihood and consequence of that risk occurring during the project. The

Identify a minimum of 10 project risks and when each will occur in the project life cycle, and then determine their impact and probability of occurrence.

Risks management is an important step during the process of a project. Failing to manage a risk may result in unforeseen event happening and a project’s failure. For example, with limited budget, an unforeseen event or an accident occurs in the middle of a project and this matter has not been considered and needs a big sum of expense, then the project may be stopped because of this unexpected event. We should know it is necessary to understand how to identify risks and assumptions based on the information. After identifying risks, it is important for project managers to set contingency plans to prevent and deal with these risks when they occur. Of course, several problems may happen during considering

Risk or threat is common and found in various fields of daily life and business. This concept of risk is found in various stages of development and execution of a project. Risks in a project can mean there is a chance that the project will result in total failure, increase of project costs, and an extension in project duration which means a great deal of setbacks for the company. The process of risk management is composed of identifying, assessing, mitigating, and managing the risks of the project. It

The term risk has been defined in so many ways by many scholars. The term ‘risk’ itself is very broad to interpret. However, risk is often defined as a threat and it usually brings negative impacts to a person or an organisation. Hansson (2005) claims that many attempts have been made to define risk in a single meaning and eliminate other definitions which are futile and a form of ‘linguistic imperialism’. Since there is no exact meaning of risk, people describe risk based on their own perceptions and purposes. Perminova et al. (2008) and the Association of Project Management (APM) define risk as an uncertain event and exclusively negative (APM, 2006). Ward and Chapman (2003) recommend that project risk management (PRM) is categorized as project uncertainty management. Nonetheless, the term ‘uncertainty’ again brings confusion as there is no single meaning that can successfully define it (Perminova et al., 2008). On the contrary, Kaplan and Garrick (1981) define risk according to public’s risk perception. There are three criteria suggested by the authors such as the failure of that particular event, its tendency as well as the impact of the failure. Although there have been countless struggles to picture risk in a proper way, it is best that the focus should be diverted to a more important issue which is how to manage risk instead of defining it as time may not be on our side.

Identify and assess the project operating risks: 3.1 Analyze the pre-completion risks 3.2 Analyze the post-completion risks 3.3 Analyze the sovereign risks, including, macro-economic, political and legal risks

The following risk register describes the risks to the project and their likelihood of occurrence and controllability factor:

Project Managers must determine the success criteria for managing a project to identify risks that could possibly impede customer requirements. Risk Management is a disciplined, systematic process to obtain the maximum benefits associated with such a management channel. Every project needs some type of documentation related to risk management activity. This type of management may take on an informal or formal approach, but risk management is essential for every project.

This section examines risk factors associated with the project. Consider the following risk, identify possible approaches to dealing with the risk, identify the appropriate impact and category of risk, and describe how you would propose to manage each risk if it occurred during the implementation stage of your project, including any containment action or contingency plan. It is not necessary to perform risk calculations here.

This involves ranking the risks according to the potential harm they may have on the project. Here one should consider the manner in which the risk is likely to affect or rather impact the budget, time period of project and scope of the project. The nest step after that is calculation of the risks basing on the impact, probability and degree of controllability.

According to the Project Management Institute’s Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge there are four steps for managing risks. In this paper there will be a look at two of the steps. In the text Project Management Risk Guidelines: Managing Risk in Large Projects and Complex Procurements, there is a chapter dedicated to Phase I and Phase II of the tender evaluation process. Essentially in each phase you are doing risk identification and risk quantification. The assignment is to compare the two phases discussed and then answer questions that compare the two phases. Since each phase is designed to serve a different purpose, you can’t really say one phase is better than another. Both phases are important in

Risk mitigation is a critical function of every project manager. A well-developed risk management process “attempts to recognize and manage potential and unforeseen trouble spots that may occur when the project is implemented” (Gray & Larson, 2006, p. 1). Risk mitigation begins with project planning. Based on previous experiences, lessons learned, schedule and budget constraints of the assigned project, the project team can identify all the risks, analyze each risk in terms of the severity of the impact, the likelihood of the occurrence, and the degree to which the risk can be controlled. Although a direct relationship between the amount of risk in a project and the opportunity for increased rewards exists, successful businesses take every

Risk identification is a recurring event; it is not performed once and then set aside. Risk identification, management, and resolution efforts continue throughout the life of the project. New risks are identified as the project progresses and external and internal situations change. Trigger dates can be included in the schedule for tracking risks.

6. Establish risk thresholds 7. Define risk communications 8. Define risk tracking process Risk Management and Project Selection Techniques Two commonly used project selection techniques are Benefit Measurement Models and Mathematical Models, i.e. (Mathematical Models used for extremely complex projects). In the workplace, Benefit Measurement Models are more often used. Some techniques in this category are: (1) Cost-benefit analysis: Which provide a net gain. Typically, the net gain is proportional to the risk level, i.e. the higher the risk, the higher the gain. (2) Weighted Scoring models: Risk of Incompletion is a factor that needs to be considered when comparing projects, using the Weighted Scoring Model for Risk Management and Project Selection to help you select a project. (3) Cash flow analysis: Takes into account the payback period, AND (4) Time Value of Money: Uses Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Generally, the higher the NPV, the better the project is. There are positive risks in every project that require knowing how to respond to them. Risk Management and Project Selection should also account for positive risks. Risk Identification Risk identification is the process of understanding what potential events might hurt or enhance a particular project. The customary origins

A project risk is an event that has a positive and negative impact on project objectives. A Project risk management plan is critical in identifying, monitoring and reporting risks. This Risk Management Plan defines how risks associated with this ten story-building project will be identify, analyze, and manage. It presents the outlines for risk activities how to perform, record and control or manage throughout the project lifecycle.