Speech On What's Up

The first amendment states that no law should be made when it comes to religion, or free exercise. Although, some people take granted of freedom of speech. There should be a limit imposed when it comes to free speech. Without limits, the world would be a chaos. Also, freedom and speech could easily turn into hate speech at anytime. By having everyone being able to speak their mind without a limit would cause a lot of controversy. People would go out and speak their mind at unnecessary time.

freedoms of speech and be punished for speaking their minds.Maybe they should have freedom of speech but how will you address the current issues with that.If you take away freedom of speech kids would dislike school more.Without the freedom of speech kids would be like robots.If they have freedom of speech in the world then why can't they have it at school.But do kids really deserve to have the freedom of speech in schools.Should school be a place where you don't have freedom of speech. If you were

In the 1960’s segregation was going on in Alabama and all across the U.S. but Martin Luther King Jr. stood up for what's rights and gave a speech about a dream that he had of the future. During that speech he used some mediums to help him get his speech out to the public he used used video to let the people who couldn’t make it to the speech in person hear what he had to say. Back then and still today people use mediums to get important speeches, words of wisdom and anything that you could think

In March 2017, Graham Hill delivers his speech “ Less Stuff, More Happiness” at Technology, Entertainment, and Design (TED) to a group of sophisticated individuals to try to persuade them that less “stuff” does equal more happiness. Graham Hill has an idea that living in a 420 square foot apartment in Manhattan can be spacious and a person who has less “stuff” can create less of an environmental footprint. Hill is a strong believer that less equals more and he uses the mode of logic of logos, facts

Can you sensor an ideology or what about speech? Do humans have the right to freedom of speech or should word and ideas be limited because certain ideas are deemed too harsh for the public’s ear? I believe that all speech should heard and no ideas censored. That your actions and speech should have consequences good and bad. Throughout history freedom has allowed nations to prevail. Do you have a right to freedom of speech? Most people agree everyone does. The problem is when people define this right

First Lady, Michelle Obama, in her speech, “Remarks By The First Lady At The Democratic National Convention,” expresses her thoughts and opinions on the candidates up for the Presidential elections. Obama's purpose is to entice the audience watching all around the world to vote for Hillary Clinton because she believes she is more liable to be President. She communicates her speech with solemnity to convince her audience that voting for Hillary is the best option for the U.S. Obama begins to discuss

Driven Life” gave a speech in February of 2006 about living a life of purpose. The speech was directed at people with an amount of influence in the world, big or small. The Purpose of this speech was to urge people to go out and use their talents, and influence to make the world a better place. Rick Warren has an excellent use of ethos, pathos, and logos in his speech. He uses his knowledge of people, and real life experiences to capture the audience’s attention. Rick Starts his speech off by talking

has the ability to decide what the citizens get to know what's going in the world. Also, women do not have the same rights and they are not educated. In America, we get the privilege and the right to know what's going on in the world and women have equal rights as men. I am very glad I have the privilege to be equal as every else unlike many people in different countries around the world. In some countries, people do not get a say in what's going to happen, they do not have equal rights, nor as many

For Gradualist, there are clear evidence such as the Quarantine speech that clearly shows how Roosevelt had shift from the isolationist stance to a more aggressive stance. Therefore in response to the question “To what extent was Roosevelt a isolationist in the 1930s?” I would say he is both Gradualist and Pragmatist; however he Is to a greater extent a Gradualist than a Pragmatist as through the Quarantine Speech it had proven one reason of Roosevelt being considered as Isolationist false;

man, and not honorable or noble, is when he dishonors his wife, Portia. Portia notices how Brutus hasn’t been acting himself lately in II.i.; by sneaking out of bed, pacing back and forth at the dinners table, responding to her rudely when she asks what’s the matter, etc. Brutus’s first mistake is when he lies and tells Portia he is not feeling well. Portia, who clearly isn’t stupid, doesn’t fall for it at all. She asks why Brutus refuses