Spy Drones Research Paper

Drones In America And How They Infringe On The Fourth Amendment and Due Process Of The Law

Menacing spy craft... unmanned aerial vehicles... and missile laden predators. These are the images that come to mind when the word "drone" is spoken. Taken to new heights during the Global War on Terror, military drones have struck fear into the hearts of America's enemies. Now the U.S. government is starting to look inward toward its next target: the American people. Already starting along the US/Mexico border, big brother is indiscriminately watching whole neighborhoods via high tech zoom and heat imaging technology. There is even a debate in congress as to whether it is lawful for an American citizen to be killed by a missile firing drone. These actions and debates have caused legitimate concerns for the American people in regards to

Every since 9/11, the surveillance in the United States has become stricter and of more importance. The security is more top-notch than it has ever been because of the fear a future terrorist attack striking once again. The United States government is doing this for safety issues and the protection of Americans, but many are against the whole idea of having the government spy on you and others actually agree with it.

Which they should not be able to do they could say that they are just doing a practice run or just testing out what they 're drone can do. There is no laws about using a drone searching your house from above and people can get out of trouble really quickly. They should be a law for people using drones to search people’s house from above. They should not just allow anyone to do that and be okay with that. That is invading the person 's privacy without a warrant and the people searching it can’t get in trouble for doing it because they can come up with an excuse and be perfectly fine.

The National Security Association (NSA) monitors the communications without warrant or viable cause, except for the threat of terrorist attacks. Allowing the U.S. Government to monitor its people violates their Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Not only is monitoring a violation of right, but the NSA is also keeping

Since the invention of the plane and other flying machines, there has been the thought of making an unmanned flying machine. Today we know our unmanned aerial vehicles by another name: drones. In my paper I will be using both Colonel Dawn Zoldi’s article about drones at home and “The Drone as Privacy Catalyst”, by Ryan Calo to evaluate privacy-related matters that people should consider when it comes to drones. Zoldi’s analysis of how the government can help with personal privacy and unwarranted use of unwarranted searches will aid my own analysis. I will focus on drones and how they relate to the fourth amendment, taking a nuanced approach to operational purpose, renewing focus on collection, dissemination and retention, molding the remedy to the violation, drone as privacy catalyst and finally adding my own thoughts and criticisms about how this could possibly affect privacy.

During Clinton’s presidency the CIA borrowed “a gangly, insect-like airplane called the RQ-1 Predator” from the Air Force which allows Clinton to view what is known as a “live drone feed” (Mazzetti 61). Some were impressed by the “insect-like” drone but felt like it would be a waste of time to sit and watch the feed. Those opposed felt that it had no use to it, but only to realize later on how great of an impact it would have for the government (Mazzetti 61). Drones would be the key weapon for a “secret war” since “it was a tool that killed quietly,” and would allow strikes in restricted areas where publicist couldn’t go (Mazzetti 99-100). This weapon created a whole new meaning behind wars and assassinations as some view them as inhuman others view it as success. Many believe citizens should have trust in the government and adhere that drones are being used to “”find, fix, and finish” terrorists” (Mazzetti 77). The CIA use of the drones makes them

I, Savannah Parmelee believe an individual's right to privacy should be protected if they do not violate the law to a certain degree therefore, I plan to seek out evidence during my research that supports this controlling idea. I am greatly concerned about this topic due to the people’s privacy not being fully protected for both terrorist and by the government.In the video “Impact of drones on privacy rights” on “CBS This Morning” claims that “Lakota, N.D., is the first known site where a drone was used domestically to help arrest a U.S. citizen.” What the quote is saying is that drones helped arrest a U.S. citizen. The incident in the video proves that drones can help see illegal activities happening and can try to stop

When the topic of drones is brought up, some may think they are not among us and are objects of the future, while others may have one that they’ve built themselves and put to use already. Drones are being talked about more and more but not necessarily all for good reasons. The reading titled “From the Eyes of a Drone” by Tomas van Houtryve touches upon how drones affect surveillance, photography, and use for weapons. In a BBC article, “Drones: What Are They and How Do They Work?” the author goes into specific detail on how the United States is planning to use drones for the military. If regular drone use becomes a normality in society, it is true that amazing photography will be a positive outcome but what about privacy? Drones can aid the military as well, but if they are released for the general public to use on the daily things may get out of control. While drones can impact several aspects of life positively, they can create even more harm than one may think.

Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. You hear a drone hovering in your backyard, invading your privacy, what do you do? Many choose the illegal path and decide to shoot or swat it down. With the rise in drone sales, more and more Americans are losing their privacy, and for this reason, the federal government needs to take action and regulate the purchase and flight of drones.

It must be expensive to have that sort of technology everywhere. In the article, It Costs the Government Just 6.5 Cents an Hour to Spy on You, Drew F. Cohen says, “Indeed, one estimate tagged the NSA’s annual surveillance costs at $574 per taxpayer, a paltry 6.5 cents an hour” (COHEN). In addition, in the article Pros of NSA Surveillance it say’s “NSA surveillance is a huge expense on the economy and on the safety of citizens without security benefits making the program worth it, considering its loopholes and its inability to halt terrorism” (NSA). This proves to show how much of our money is being taken way for such an unsafe and unnecessary cause that we do not

All in all, drone surveillance is deteriorating our society, as it poses a risk to national security, invades on personal property, and infringes of people’s safety. Drones are everywhere, catching your every move. If citizens refuse to fight back, the government could evolve until they are constantly monitoring everything you do. One solution to this problem is to enforce the fourth amendment more strictly, and restrict police from flying drones into our property without reason or motive. Next time you look outside, imagine what police drones are finding from

Another industry that is benefiting from drones that are already helping to produce a better product is farming. The new age of farming will most certainly involve the use of drones to assist the farmer in making a larger quantity of a better crop. Cost is a big factor for farmers in determining decisions they will make, with the use of a drone in the fields, cost will be greatly reduced. With a drone there would be no need for crop sprayers to spray the field, or large, expensive combines to seed the crop. The drones would easily be able to do this safely, and

From flying though the skies to reading license plates, these are all examples of the government spying on Americans. According to MacAskill and Gabriel Dance, these devices are used for criminal investigations (2013). “The government uses tools in criminal, terrorism, or intelligence investigations (“FBI Operating Gleet of Surveillance Aircraft Flying over US Cities,” 2015). Even though these tools are used for protection, they still violate privacy rights. When a car passes a license plate reader, the readers get the information of one’s specific time and date along with the license plate number (Crockford, 2015). Kenneth Lipp found the Boston license plate reader database online, which contained addresses and personal information of millions of the license plate owners. This personal information was available for the whole world to see. License plate readers are not the only devices collecting information on Americans; unfortunately, sting rays are also spying on US citizens. No, not the sting rays in the ocean. Sting rays are defined as a “portable spy device to track cell phone signals inside vehicles, homes, and insulated buildings” (Crockford, 2015). When someone makes a call, the Sting Ray sends the call to the police to be tracked. Information can be taken from cell phones around the Sting Ray also (Walker, 2013). A Sting Ray may be used to find criminals, but innocent

The government wouldn’t just invade people’s privacy, but also illegal search places without a warrant. “Senator Dianne Feinstein has called the use of drones ‘the greatest threat to the privacy of Americans’” because they “have the potential to be more intrusive than any other kind of technology” (Koh). The government can get a drone next to a house and receive infinite information about the people inside within seconds. The Fourth Amendment prohibits illegal searches and seizes, however “drones can be used to hover over a particular place for a long time or to track the movements of a specific person, and drones the size of insects can be sent to spy on individuals in their private homes” which can be a violation of the Fourth Amendment if the police don't have the proper approval (Koh). With law enforcement being able to easily look inside homes through drones, they no longer have to obtain a subpoena and legally search homes; they can just use drones to fly around and illegally search people’s homes without probable