Stephanie M. Wildman and Adrienne D. Davis are very convincing by having a well thought out essay, I do agree with them when the say "Building a sense of community across these power categories is our real challenge" (pg. 341). Communities are every where, and factions are developed because of human need to feel exclusive, when communities are able to communicate tolerably standards for tolerance are raised higher. When building a more general populace than divided residents there is more gray area to maneuver in so anybody can assimilate with everybody. Grand Valley State has already taken initiatives to crack down on -isms by always asking its students if they have been targets to intolerance and are active to resolve and prevent such discriminations.
This is the real world with real problems. People are unable to unite due to the disapproval by some to those of contrasting lifestyles. People may tolerate others, but that doesn’t mean they truly accept them. Going off of what author Anna Quindlen has said, tolerance is nothing more than simply letting others remain unbothered and unnoticed. Even then, there are still people who cannot let others live with that peace, such as many events from this nation’s history shows.
How can we foster a climate of acceptance and cultural pluralism in the United States?
Since our nation has such diverse qualities and characteristics, you would think that everyone who lives in such a country, we would all come and stick together. With people who are so different, in so many different types of ways, being a united and unified nation would be knowledgeable. But instead our country consists of "people making strenuous efforts to group themselves with people who are basically like themselves" (Brooks 62). When taking a deeper look, and basically breaking down the nation piece by piece, we see segregation that happens to go unnoticed. There are neighborhoods that have a reputation for being where "African Americans live," “Asians Live," "Caucasians live," "Mexicans live" etc. which is not a good thing. People tend to not go out of their comfort zone and expand on what they are used to, to try new things, which is usually only
It is clearly apparent in society that segregation causes unneeded violence and hatred that can be stopped once everyone learns to respect and notice their differences. Although, this transformation does not seem to be as easy as it sounds. In this case, fear impacts equality and when fear prevents equality, people 's’ opinions are not able to be heard, leading to discrimination and injustice. The fear of differing ideas and opinions makes it hard to reach independence and freedom because a negative mindset is preventing the transformation. Throughout history and into today, the largest injustice in our society deals with racial prejudice, and the fear of emerging cultures often leads to superiority with the majority of the population and inferiority with the minority.
Mark Lilla’s argument in The End of Identity Liberalism definitely recognizes the underlying problem in the “success story” (Lilla 1) of the American diversity: a lack of unifying force (Lilla 1). However, it seems to be too arbitrary to deduce from the defects of identity liberalism that the possible solution is only an either-or choice: the necessity of a unifying force should predicate the end of identity liberalism. The end of identity liberalism will come at some time, but today must not be the time. The end of identity liberalism should be based upon universally equal acceptance and representation of different individuals, a point that is ignored by Lilla in his argument.
We can foster a climate of acceptance and cultural pluralism by treating one another with respect and being open minded. We all need to take time out of our lives and actually realize what we are showing the next generation. The youth is what are future is and what is holds, and if we cant even show one another respect for each other, that can you imagine what this place we call home will look like in a couple of years or even further down the road.
In the following readings “How homophobia hurts everyone”, Blemenfield W.J, “Black English/ Ebonics: What It be like?” Smitherman G “Asian American Exclusion and Segregation”, Spring J, “, “Ex-slaves and the Rise of Education in the South”, Anderson J and “Bilingual Education Works”, Stephen Krashen they all have a similar theme. The occurring theme that I got from the readings was how the dominant groups of society want to keep their power. The dominant group will go to the extreme to keep their power over the subordinate group of people.
No one really knows who started the whole diversity but it has been a problem for the victims and no one knows if it will ever end. Bigotry exists when one ethnic gathering or authentic collectivity commands, avoids, or looks to dispose of another on the premise of contrasts that it accepts are innate and unalterable. An ideological premise for express bigotry happened as expected in the west amid the current period. No reasonable and unequivocal confirmation of prejudice has been found in different societies or in Europe before the Middle Ages. Americans say there is a lot of segregation and a developing sentiment racial pressure in the United States, with sharp partitions in how diverse gatherings see these issues, as indicated by another survey.
Implementation of this process will gradually integrate the minority into the system, causing all groups to be culturally similar with their differences no longer a basis for prejudice from the dominant group. (Dubois, Miley 172)
are a “melting pot” of differences that should work together to create a better future for us all
Unity is a key component for the future of America. People must respect each other's differences. It should not matter what one's race, religion, nationality or sexual preference is, because in
The simple answer to that would be segregation. However, there are so many more questions that can be posed from this answer. The most important question that can arise may be, why we are segregating? Though of course segregation has been around and
Cathy N. Davidson suggests an innovative education system, providing an emphasis in today’s digital era, and claiming that the existing education system needs to be renewed according to the new expectations of the digital era. Davidson states that,” In the last half century, many changes have occurred in the technology field, however, classrooms and educational methods have remained fairly steady for the past years as well in consequence students are not being prepared for the future advances of society.” That being said, it is important to improve and to give a change to the current educational methods, adjusting them to the existing demands of the era that we are living and taking advantage of the resources that it provides. “What if we continued to the lesson of internet itself,
Even though there are set values that are universally known to the public, people do not always follow those values within their groups. However, these people have to act in conformity and abide by the values in public. Although everyone assumes that “imagined communities” contain a common culture, in reality, they really do not due to the fact that there are many body of ideas and practices that are not shared. Many languages are spoken and countless number of religions are practiced in various countries, so these make the “common culture” idea a misconception among citizens of different countries. For example, people tend to think that America consists of culture that is common, but they do not know if the beliefs, values, and practices are universally shared by all Americans. Nonetheless, there was a time when a dominant culture in the United States actually existed. It was during when the religion of Christianity was prominent and when many countries in Europe spoke the English language. It should be known that black Americans, Chinese-Americans, and white Americans have a common culture because of everything they do and do not share. From the common culture would arise the social identity, which can cause problems in diversity. Diversity can be an issue because of the ignorance of all the contrasting values. These issues arise because racial and ethnic identities are compared to one another and both can also relate to genders and sexualities. Nevermore, distinct genders and sexualities often live together now with the same knowledge and values and can still grow into opposite racial identities. Ethnic identities are so different since they are created in family and community life and people want the solidarity from being unique to one
America was made up of power value, creating a barrier that indicates other races to be more superior then the other. People are divided into different races based on their genetic background. Social collaboration is what comes of such a divided racial community. Society has been tainted and brainwashed to believe people are defined by the color of their skin, which cause separation and borders to be created. Ethnicity and race are both socially constructed. Ethnicity has entities of race, however, it has more of a broad arena, ethnicity is made up of religion, nationality, heritage, and cultural practices. One racial group can contain a plethora of ethnicities.