Summary Of The Scientific Case Against Evolution

Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain the origin, diversity and complexity of life. I will will disprove evolution by showing that natural selection only explains small evolutionary changes, collectively known as microevolution. Natural selection cannot drive large evolutionary changes, macroevolution. I will also show that the primordial soup, in which life supposedly evolved, did not exist.

The debate over Evolutionary theories and Creationism beliefs has been a major debate throughout our churches, education system, and even our homes. There have been countless scientists, theologians, journalists and Christians that have studied both sides of the spectrum, that argue how the world we live in was created. Many empty statements, with little to no facts, just assertions about this particular question have been stated in many debates all over the world. So on one side we have Creationism belief that essentially argues that God is the “intelligent designer” and on the other side Evolutionary theories that state the world has evolved over the centuries. In the Merriam- Webster dictionary, Creationism is defined as, “a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and usually in the way described in Genesis “. Merriam- Webster dictionary also defines Evolution as, “a theory that the differences between modern plants and animals are because of changes that happened by a natural process over a very long time; the process by which changes in plants and animals happen over time; a process of slow change and development”. So is it possible to believe both of those definitions?

Comment Powered by Li 1 UCOR 1620 02 Darwin & the idea of Evolution Mingxi Li(Jessie) Mar. 8th, 2017 Assignment 3 Argument against Evolution by Natural Selection Abstract Natural selection is one of the numerous theories that attempt to explain the evolution of living things from their primitive origins to the more advanced organisms existing today. At its core, this theory supports the notion that only the strongest organisms survive in a changing environment while their weak counterparts die off. Nevertheless, various circles regard the evolutionary theory by natural selection as practically impossible. Since its conception, proponents of the theory have defended it with the help of

In 1925, a young Tennessee school teacher named John T. Scopes defied the state’s law prohibiting the teaching of evolution. Scopes was arrested and the case immediately got national headlines causing William Jennings Bryan to announce his intention to join the prosecution. Then, the ACLU got involved and offered to defend Scopes. When Darrow heard about the case, he said he would defend the school teacher free of charge. To Darrow’s thinking, Bryan was the embodiment of all those aspects of rural America that Darrow had escaped so many years before.

The foundation for the theory of evolution was laid by Charles Darwin (Rose, n.d.). He developed hypotheses about natural selection which helped scientists develop the theory. Evolution is a theory and not a hypothesis because evolution has been proven by vast amounts of scientific data, research, and testing. The definition of a hypothesis is an educated explanation that needs to be researched and tested but has not yet been proven (Earman, 1984). There has been no scientific evidence to disprove the theory of evolution.

recent debate, between Bill Nye “The Science Guy” and Ken Ham, has sparked even more

Evolution: Fact, Fraud, or Faith by Don Boys was a very educational book on why evolution is wrong, and gives many examples. The first chapter I read explained why the foundation of evolution is cracking. The word science is Latin, and scio means to know. The book explains that Evolutionists cannot know, the either hope, wonder, or assume. Boys gives numerous examples of fault in evolutionist's books. He said that one author used "we may suppose" over 800 times! Dr. Fleischmann, who is a Professor of Zoology, said that there is "not a single fact" of Darwin's theory of Evolution in nature. He said it was just a product of the imagination. Many other Evolutionist scientists sated in some way they did not believe in a part or the whole of evolution

This leaves lots of room for error. "A severe problem for evolutionists is the absence of transitional forms in the fossil record. By transitional forms, we mean intermediate forms of life appearing in the fossil record that are 'in-between' existing types of organisms found today or in the past," says davidll@cit-tele.com of the Evolution vs. Creation Resource Center about the probability of fossil evidence. This fact is the proverbial speed-bump in evolution. To examine one fossil, or a group of fossils such as a hand, next to another, find similarities, and proclaim them to be of relation, requires an amount of faith (Bethel 170). Stop to think about it. A human hand has five fingers; a chimpanzee hand has five fingers. What within those bones proves that thousands of years ago, humans either were chimpanzees, or that chimp family A left chimp family B for some inexplicable reason, and grew to be humans? What disproves this? No one can go back and decide either way. It is a theory, nothing more nothing less. Some may say apparently harmless in comparison to the great religions of the world.

Throughout history we have slowly gained more and more information about genetics, our environment, and how they interact with each other. Neither of those things could determine a human’s (or any other animal’s) independently, but when you put them together you learn why humans are the way they are. Genetic diversity, natural selection, and evolution are just a few of the incredible things that makes humans, as well as all living things, truly beautiful.

My friend says of that he doesn’t believe in evolution He says that it is something that some guy just made up and there is no evidence to prove it. So I am going to prove to him and everybody else who doesn’t believe in evolution that it is real. Evolution is the descent with modification. There is five pieces of evidence for evolution. They are the fossil record, embryology, comparative anatomy, molecular biology, and biology/ direct observation. There is one really important person that we cannot forget when it comes to evolution. His name is Charles Darwin and his theory is really important to evolution. Now I am about to prove to you that evolution is real.

In 1895 Charles Darwin published a book describing his theory of evolution, and his theory of the natural selection process. This theory caused much uproar in the religious community because Darwin’s theory went against the story of creation portrayed in the Holy Bible. His theory claimed that all life currently in place had evolved and adapted from a single organism in the beginning. Over time and by process of natural selection only the dominant species were left over while the other, less dominant species, went extinct. His theory, backed by scientific analysis, had dismissed the idea of a single deity creating all life on Earth. It is not like Darwin had a personal agenda against religion or anything,

Creationists, mistaking the uncertain in science for the unscientific, see the debate among evolutionists regarding how best to explain evolution as a sign of weakness. Scientists, on the other hand, see uncertainty as simply an inevitable element of scientific knowledge. They regard debates on fundamental theoretical issues as healthy and stimulating. Science, says evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould, is "most fun when it plays with interesting ideas, examines their implications, and recognizes that old information may be explained in surprisingly new ways." Thus, through all the debate over evolutionary mechanisms biologists have not been led to doubt that evolution has occurred. "We are debating how it happened," says Gould (1983, p.256).

Although most of the people support Darwin's theory of evolution, there is a small part of sound say that they do not believe Darwin's theory of evolution. Of course they have their argument, otherwise, they do not need to support this. First, they think the fossil recode is not continuous and messy. That is, the lack of excessive species of fossils. According to Darwin's theory of evolution, evolution is continuous, in this case, it should not only lack the fossil of excessive species. For example, Archeopteryx is considered to be an excessive species of birds and reptiles. However, five of the six fossils were identified as man-made, and the last one resolutely rejects any identification. There is another doubt about the evolution of mankind:

True it is that animals should be treated with respect in today’s society, instead of immoral. Even though they are not human exhibits as we are they still need to be respected in their own habitat. Speciesism is the discrimination against species, especially against animals. Speciesism is often used to show human behavior to the non-human animals (Mosser, 2014). The argument about speciesism with Regan And Singer, supports that animals should not be mistreated. They both want humans to change the way they treat animals through legal protection.

How does natural selection act as a driving force of evolution? In order to answer this question, we must first know what natural selection is and what key factors about how the theory was established. So, what is natural selection? Well, it’s simply where organisms adapt better to their environment has a higher percentage chance of surviving and producing more offspring. This theory was first discovered by Charles Darwin. Darwin was a naturalist who got with several other scientists and developed the theory of evolution. Evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the Earth. In order to support the theory of evolution