Swot Analysis Of Telstra Corporation Limited

Telus appeared in the late 1990’s by the merger of Alberta-based Telus and BC Telecom in an environment of significant changes for the incumbent carriers who had previously enjoyed a monopolized service offering. Soon after its creation Telus found itself in the early 2000 to be facing major hurdles of maintaining its financing plans. The early 2000 offered an environment of increased competition for telecom companies, saw the crash of the dot-com bubble and offered a weaker business climate as a result of the 9/11 tragedy. Within this environment, the ratings by credit rating companies had a profound influence on how telecom companies would continue to do business.

TELUS is regulated under federal laws by the CRTC. The consequence of regulatory proceedings could have a material impact on operating procedures and profitability, such as wireless consumer legislation and new requirement for Internet frameworks may causes extra timing on license transfer and approval. At the same time, TELUS also have certain power to monitor and control the level of non-Canadian ownership of company’s common share (The Telecommunications Regulations) for the purpose of company protection.

Telstra is the leading telecommunication company in Australia. Their strategic purpose can be identified through their mission, vision, values and objectives. Telstra considers the improvement of how people live and work as a vision for the company. Their mission is introducing technologies and content solutions that are simple, easy and valued by customers. Telstra’s core values are about how showing care, and to work with customers and to trust one another, as well as making complex simple.

Telstra is a prime example of a government imposed price control in Australia which has not been significantly effective. Price controls were implemented towards Telstra in 1989 when it was the only telecommunication provider and have been placed ever since. In the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999, Telstra agreed to retail price control arrangement but are now currently reviewed since 2010 by the Australian Competition and Consumer Protection (ACCC) who monitor and report to the Minister for communications.

Vodafone is one of the most important players on the European telecommunications market. However, this does not mean that the company has an easy job at retaining its customers and at increasing its market share. The most important competitors of Vodafone are represented by Orange and Cosmote. The regulations in the business field determine these companies to provide similar products and services, at similar prices. Therefore, it is important that Vodafone focuses on its communications strategy in order to strengthen its position on the market.

Telstra was the most widely used telecom provider in Australia, but with the increasing competition and the entry of new companies, they are facing a decrease in their revenues. In 1990, Optus became the second largest telecom and fixed-line internet provider in Australia. Moreover, the telecom industry was following the traits of duopoly market. Nevertheless, with the technological advancement and rising competition many firms have entered the Australian market, which is a matter of concern for Telstra group (Ramli, 2015).

With the use of technology rampantly increasing in society, Telstra is a company that appeals to a vast range of people, providing consumers with mobile and media connectivity, businesses with necessary software and network applications, and the sick and elderly with ehealth solutions.

Telstra can simply allow their loyal customers to have unlimited access to internet for the same price they are paying. Unmetered internet use will definitely give competitors a run

While Verizon remains the industry leader in market share, subscribers, profitability, and customer loyalty, the wireless industry has become significantly more competitive in the last few years (Fiercewireless, 2016). In 2013 T-Mobile launched its un-carrier strategy with the intention of disrupting the marketplace by dissolving industry norms such as, service contracts, equipment subsidies, and data limits (Sherman, 2013). Additionally, T-Mobile substantially lowered the monthly cost of their service to attract more customers and accelerate subscriber growth. Subsequently, Sprint quickly responded by matching T-Mobile’s strategy and the industry was plunged into a full blown pricing war in 2014 (Carew, 2014). Consequently, profit margins

In this new era of internet and cellphones one of the biggest battles that can be easily seen just by perusing the internet or watching a bit of television is the clash for who will provide us with these newly acclaimed necessities. The two biggest players in the industry these days appears to be Verizon and AT&T. Other big companies, such as Sprint and T-Mobile, are also key competitors, but it seems like Verizon and AT&T vide for the top. Today, we can’t even go a single commercial break without seeing at least one ad for one of these two companies try to convince us to switch to their services. Even though it’s fairly easy to say that there are only really three or four major competitors in this field, there are definitely several smaller

In June 2015 Telstra launched Australia's largest wifi network Telstra Air, which gives telstra home broadband customers the power to use their data allowance and go online at thousands of hotspots in Australia and millions of hotspots overseas. This is an expensive investment, contributing to the decline in fixed product revenue (decline 1.9%). However, it will increases customers value and distinguishes telstra from other telecommunication providers.

By forming a joint venture with Unisource, AT&T brought strengths such as a strong brand, financial capital and its ability to offer combined voice, data and messaging services to European businesses. At&T’s brand as the largest communications provider in the United States brought both expertise and technology to the joint venture. However, A&T did not have the capability of entering the European market. Strong regulatory barriers prevented AT&T from entering the European market without a European partner like Unisource. Through the joint venture between AT&T and Unisource, the two companies aimed to increase competitiveness within the European market. Business consumers would benefit by combined telecommunication products, in turn improving

Telstra has been spending a lot of money and time studying and analysing the customers’ demands and expectations in the Australian market to develop a successful tactics by mixing them with its power elements to build up those strong smart tactics which have the capability to smash any competitor easily.

Telstra is Australia 's driving information transfers and data administrations organization, offering a full scope of interchanges administrations and contending in all information transfers markets.

Infosys is an IT consulting company based in India but primarily doing business with North American firms looking to outsource their IT needs. With the rise of the popularity in this form of business between the United States and India, there have been several political factors in both countries that will affect the way Infosys does business. In the US, President Obama made outsourcing a hot topic of his campaign platform. With speeches such as “Say no to Bangalore, yes to Buffalo” he is looking to provide incentives to American companies to keep all of their jobs on American soil, close tax loopholes and eliminate breaks given to companies that outsource to firms such as Infosys. On the flip side though, the US government is also looking to change immigration policies to restrict H-1B visas that would have previously allowed foreign skilled technical workers to be brought in to the US on work visas. While they won’t be eliminating them, they are seeking to restrict them which would force Infosys to hire employees from the US for any work they would be doing in the country and restricting the available talent pool. Meanwhile, the government in India is making changes of their own, particularly with reforming the tax code. To encourage the growth of the Software and Technology fields the Indian government had established significant tax breaks which are now coming to an end. In addition, they have