Symbolic Way Of Interaction Analysis

* This article spoke of the positions of power between men and women, and how policymakers and supervisors distribute that power to men and women. In the work place, when considering for advancement, employers have undefined criteria such as personality characteristics and potential managerial qualities. These standards become the cause of inequality in authority and power at work place. Jobs that are available for women have low wages and also less authority. Similar research studies have shown parallel points, in that inequality is found at the workplace because of such gender based

Symbolic Interactionism is the “ongoing use of language and gestures in anticipation of how the other will react” (Em Griffin, 2012, p. 54). George Herbert Mead, a philosopher at the University of Chicago, developed this theory. He believed “that our thoughts, self-concept, and the wider community we live in are created through communication, verbal and non-verbal” (Em Griffin, 2012, p. 54). There are “three core principles of symbolic interaction: meaning, language, and thinking” (Em Griffin, 2012, p. 54). The meaning is “humans act toward people and things according to the meanings they assign to those people or things” (Em Griffin, 2012, p. 55). Language “arises out of the social

Instead of being allowed to become corporate leaders and influential characters that can bring change to the system, women are encouraged to become part-time employees. They are often offered positions that are important but not influential enough to affect policy. In this manner they are shown that they are good enough to work, but not quite ready to accept the mantle of leadership.

The Symbolic Interaction theory refers to ways in which a family or society attaches meaning to verbal communication, non-verbal communication, people, and objects. We are taught from a young age communication using verbal language and accepted ways to express our needs. The theory represents perception of objects or actions (Macionis, 2007, p.17).

Research on networking shows that women are less likely to choose partners with power and authority (Ibarra, 1992, 1993; McGuire, 2000). Lyness and Thompson (2000) found that both genders report different social and professional experiences in reaching top management. This study represents how gender stereotyping affects the women of the workplace and their struggle to reach upper management. Overall trying to bring awareness of gender stereotypes that are not being taken seriously.

Symbolic Interactionism focuses on face-to-face communication. It is also micro-level theory; meaning this theory covers very specific relationships between individuals or small groups. Micro level theories are more distinct then other perspectives. Micro theories are more scientifically testable. Symbolic Interactionism researchers are dependent on context and qualitative research methods such as interviews. (OpenStaxCollegeChap1). Social researchers who apply symbolic-interactionist thinking examine for patterns of relationships between entities. Researchers believe that individual’s rely on things such as dialogs, thoughts, ideas, symbols, and language to shape their own reality and social norm (OpenStaxCollegChap1).Understanding symbolic interaction theory helps one gain meaning and understanding of his or her experiences in life, not only their own life, but others as well .” This viewpoint sees people as active in shaping their world, rather than as entities who are acted upon

Women are currently working in the work force than ever before. As this is liberating to see woman right next to men working everyday, there are still alarming issues that arise for woman by working in the work force. Theorist Dorothy E. Smith goes into the discussion regarding how different agencies have control over our lives. Companies and organizations do employ people, however, they do have control over these people as a result. For example, by controlling their pay and their well-being is having a lot of control over a group of people—speaking on a theoretical/ideological level. Now, between males and females, who is more than likely to be sitting in charge at a CEO position, a male or female? Well, of course it is male. Thus, it is easy for men to pick men for certain privileges /promotions. As women now have the freedom to join the work force, they have to work twice as hard (if not harder) to compete in the man’s world. Women have to live in a different world than men, but I will get to that a little later. It should not be surprising that this way of thinking could come up for feminist theorist. On the other hand, Collins talks about how certain organizations (like churches) can empower

Structural functional theory is the belief that society is a convoluted system with a variety of co-dependent parts that must work as a team to bring about stability (Lucas n.d.). This type of approach views society through a large scale focus on the structure of society, and how it is shaped as a whole. It also thinks society has evolved much the same way as organism have,

Symbolic interaction is the theoretical perspective that introduces the fact that people attribute meanings to different symbols in various aspects of social life (Brym and Lie 2012:6). An interactionist wants to look at why someone will

Since the beginning of history, men have always been considered the innate leaders of any society. They are considered to be aggressive, dominant, smart for business, and born to be leaders. Conversely, to women who since early history had to break stereotypes to show that they had the potential to work and prove themselves to hold powerful positions at work. Due to the pursuit of women 's rights and equality to men, known as feminism, history has changed. Different from decades ago, women are now entitled to choose between working and staying at home, they have more options than just being a wife and a mom. While, women now have rights, they still carry different stereotypes that sometimes prevent them to be respected and considered for a better position at the workplace. Stereotypes of women such as sensitive, unstable, deep emotional are some of the reasons why women are not considered potential leaders. That is why, as Ariel Levy discusses in her essay “Female Chauvanist Pigs” “Women who 've wanted to be perceived as powerful have long found it more effective to identify with men than to try and elevate the entire female sex to their level” (268). Instead of fulfilling the designated stereotypes, women are showing that they can have a masculine side too. In order to be considered as powerful leaders in a male dominated society, most women try to identify with men by acquiring masculine characteristics.Although, the successful leadership style is masculine, women

Previous research into women in management is based on “assumptions of sisterhood and solidarity behaviour” (Mavin, 2006a).

Symbolic interactionism is a two way process, this theory implies that others use symbols to communicate effectively with one another. It is also a way of how you

More and more women are rising to the leadership challenge, even in some of the most male-dominated industries. The increase in the number of women attending college, the increasing number of women in the workplace or starting their own business has demonstrated to men who own businesses that women can be both managers and mothers, thus showing their male counterpart that women can in fact "do it all".

Every individual is involved in various groups, activities, relationships, and roles, and therefore is participating in a subculture. Both objective and subjective contingencies influence one’s involvement in their subculture. These shifts and stages of involvement form one’s subcultural career. Analyzing subcultural careers from the symbolic interactionist perspective teaches one much about the interpretive and social dimensions of participation in a subculture. An understanding of the theoretical framework of symbolic interactionism and of concepts such as subculture and subcultural career provides a framework for effectively analyzing my career in the Tylenol drug subculture. The symbolic interactionist perspective of interpreting subcultural careers provides an understanding of social reality.

You grow up with the feeling that your dad has always had favoritism towards your brother and that you have never been good enough for him. Every Time your Dad does any kind of activity when your brother you feel like it because your dad's has favoritism and that he is biased towards your brother and just ignores you. Your Dad just recently asked your brother to get lunch with him right in front of your face neglecting to ask you. You get upset, you run upstairs, and you slam your door. You don’t know why theses actions always lead to your mind thinking your Dad likes your brother because every time this happens your Dad comes and assures you that he doesn't favor your brother and that he loves you both equally. What kind of theory would explain how you process these interactions between you, your brother and your dad? This scenario is a perfect example of Symbolic Interaction Theory. “Symbolic Interaction Theory, 2012” it states that symbolic interactionism is the attempt to explain such differences in message interpretation as it analyzes how people attach various meanings to words and symbols”. Going into detail on the scenario, this is symbolic interaction because she takes her father's actions of asking her brother to hang out so much as a symbolism that she is not worthy enough to hang out and that her brother is better than her. George Mead once wrote (Scheffler, I. (2013). Four Pragmatists A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead, and Dewey. Florence: Taylor