Teaching Styles And Methods Rather Than Learning

Whether you believe learning styles are a myth or fact they still can help you learn the material for class. Just because you take this test online and it says that you are one hundred percent auditory learner doesn’t mean you can’t learn other ways. Learning styles can help you discover more creative ways for you to remember a topic or specific details. How Amy made a poster it helped her present her topic but also helped her learn and remember her topic. By writing it down and being creative you will remember the topic a lot better. I’m not a firm believer in learning styles but I do think that they can help. I am an auditory learner so listening helps me learn although it isn’t the only way I can learn. One of the ken talks we had watched

A learning style is a particular way in which the mind receives and processes information. There are four types of Learning Styles: Visual (Sight), Auditory (Talk), Tactile (Hands-on),, and . I am an auditory learner which means I'm a talker. My weak learning style is

able to utilise my full potential to achieve a successful graduation of this three- year

There are three major types of learning styles in regards to what motivates a person to learn. These styles are defined as goal motivated, relationship motivated and learning motivated. Motivational learning can be summarized as, the foundation of learning. In addition to your motivational style there are five more learning aspects which influence’s learning abilities as identified in Marcia L. Conner (2004) book Learn More Now:

The learning style survey reflected that I am a strong visual learner. The survey was extremely accurate and has a strong correlation as to why certain subjects are easier for me to be successful in than others. For example, math is easier for me to grasp than literature based courses. Mathematics is comprised of complex formulas and diagrams. Explicit modeling must be done by the instructor (solving problems on the board and drawing diagrams) in order to effectively teach math. This is a direct contrast to literature instruction.

However, as through as this theory may seem, there are still some who are skeptic of the learning style notion. In the article "Let Go of 'Learning Styles' Myth,” it states “Teachers are well meaning, but buying into the "learning styles" myth has not been definitively shown to improve educational outcomes. So let it die already.” Researchers and educators alike who do not accept this theory agree that students should learn to understand material regardless of their learning style, in order to strive in the competitive world. Even though this ideology makes sense, the outcomes of using our outdated methods have unfortunately been distraught. Students deserve to be successful in their education without having tests determining how smart they

VARK Learning Styles refer to a learning theory that differentiates individuals into learning groups. This theory became well known in the 1970s. It is used in identifying individual students learning capabilities. Each learning styles depends on cognitive, emotional, environmental factors and previous experience. Educators use the different learning style in classroom activities, curriculum, and assessments. The acronym for VARK stands for the following learning style: visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic/tactile. Each variable represents a distinctive preferred way of learning for an individual. Visual learners prefer the use of images, maps, and graphic organizers to access and understand new information. Auditory learners use listening, speaking such as lectures and class discussions to process data. On the other hand, some students favor the reading and writing method utilizing note taking and translating concepts. Finally, the kinesthetic or tactile style of learning depends on hands-on and the use of qualities such as gestures, body movements, and positioning in learning (Peyman et al., 2014).

The topic under discussion within this paper is that of learning styles and how each individual has a dominant way of learning. There are many types of ,learning styles which are being discussed throughtout the paper and the succussfulness of these theories. There is also a reflective account to the learning styles presentation and how effective this was within a group, presented through kolbs learning style cycle.

In reading the curriculum books this semester, there were many inspiring and helpful aspects that I was able pull out and apply to my ministry. In Doug Field’s book, Your First Two Years In Youth Ministry, I found Field’s ideas of continuously checking the motives of the heart, battling discouragement, and handling change to be very impactful. I also find Sustainable Youth Ministry by Mark DeVries to be helpful in discussing climate control, the importance of emotional health, and how to handle church politics. In addition, Alan L. Reid’s book titled, Raising the Bar, was useful in identifying the false notion of adolescence, the power of prayer, and the importance of biblical truth. Finally, in his book, Age of Opportunity, Paul David Tripp

This issue is a controversy. The reason learning styles are such a controversial issue because learning styles theories have been criticized by many due to the lack of evidence to support this topic on the idea that people are somehow a particular type of learner (Coffield, Moseley, Hall, & Ecclestone, 2004). Moreover, several psychologists and neuroscientists questioned the scientific basis on which learning theories is established. Also, several educational psychologists believe that there is little to no evidence to support the efficacy of most learning style models because the models often rest on dubious theoretical grounds (Curry, 1990). Even though there is more evidence to support the lack of evidence on this topic that

At maximum, the topic was only hinted at through a general statement about “Be an example of Christ.” Shawn also hinted at this when he encouraged the youth to bring their friends and in return, he would shave his beard. Conversely, they had a greater focus on discipleship. Through the teaching of Joseph, they learned about trusting God, among other things. While the focus was there, I find that it seemed to be lacking. I believe this youth group is prone to the same weakness as many other ministries. On my visit, they did not attain a true understanding of both the cost and truth of following God. Most likely, the application of discipleship that was addressed is something the students can understand during youth group time, but they will not be able to carry it home with

Every person has a different type of learning style and a different personality. Certain learning styles can require very different types of studying methods and ways to retain information for an extended period of time. The type of personality someone has is a very important factor in studying methods as well.

It is important in this present age to keep youth engaged in ministry. Furthermore, the main essential goal of an effective youth ministry is that it should be ran with structure, order, sound biblical and ecclesiastical conviction as it’s foundation. The purpose should be to engage the youth within the church as well. If youth do not feel engaged, they are most likely to leave the church once they are no longer forced by parents to attend. It is important for youth leaders to know and have a comprehensive understanding that they are evangelists. Once youth leaders understand that it’s not about filling seats at church, it’s about winning souls for the kingdom and getting the youth active and engaged within ministry.

Furthermore, as I read the assigned articles and viewed videos, I realized that my teachers obviously, followed Piaget’s, Vygotsky. Dewey, and Bruner constructivist view because they used the theory of assimilation and accommodation, e.g., the learning of a new experience and changing of a person’s worldview. I also discovered after deep reflection on this week’s assignment, how much of an impact my teachers had on my teaching style. Before retiring, I taught based on what my students needed. Therefore, much of my teaching mixed the theories of, Constructivism, Social Constructivism and Cognitive-Behavioral depending on the student.

After reading through the book I began to compile what my youth ministry would look like and how these different perspectives on life have influenced and changed my view of a student ministry.