Technology Integration Matrix Is A Rubric For Teachers

The use of technology in today’s time continues to develop inside and beyond the classroom. Promoting technology in classrooms gives teachers the tools they need to connect with this digital media world; however, the challenge is how and when integration is useful. Many teachers currently do not have the technological fluency to accomplish the goals of the new national standards. The Common Core standards expect teachers to include technology in their learning to increase student achievement. It is important for all educational stakeholders to work together on the common goal of preparing our youth for the future. To acquire a better understanding of teachers and administrators’ attitudes toward technology integration, the following research question is developed: How does integrating technology in the classroom increase student achievement? The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of integrating technology in middle school classroom and the benefits of integrating technology in the classroom. This research investigated the effectiveness of the usage of technology in the classroom, student achievement of the use of technology, and teacher and principals’ perspectives of technology.

Incorporating technology in the classroom is a leading trend among educators in the 21st century. Teacher use classroom websites, technology tools, and online web assessments to keep parents and students informed, improve instruction, and individualize learning. Using technology to support communication helps keep both students and parents informed on what is happening in the classroom and the students’ academic progress. Integrating technology in the classroom helps increase student engagement and participation. Students use technology tools to help reinforce instruction and teachers may use it as a form of remediation. Technology can also help with differentiating instruction with the use of online assessments. Incorporating technology in the classroom can increase students’ success in the classroom and beyond.

This paper is a personal technology plan that includes my personal philosophy on integrating technology in the classroom as well as my professional goals concerning technology in the classroom. My Mission and Vision Statement are included as well as a plan for communications, integrating technology, software to support assessment, and technology ethics for a strong guideline in the classroom. Although this plan will need to be revised as advances in technology are made this is strong ground work that I can build on as a professional educator. Using this plan I can ensure that my students are using the latest

According to my findings from unit 1, use of technology in lessons must not be a goal unto itself: the purpose is not to teach children how to use computers; they can do this as they get older, just as they can learn to drive a car later in their lives (Wardle, 1999).Successful technology integration is achieved when the use of technology is routine and transparent, accessible and readily available for the task at hand and supporting the curricular goals, and helping the students to effectively reach their goals.

In the articles “What Is The Future Of Technology In Education?” by Matt Britland and “New Class(room) War: Teacher vs Technology” by Samuel G. Freedman, two different viewpoints are expressed toward technology integration education. The authors show the implications of technology on the attitudes of teachers and students. Britland and Freedman agree that technology and theoretical framework are two inseparable facets but propose different solutions to the actions that should be taken to result in pedagogical expertise.

When I worked on my undergraduate degree between 2000 and 2004, technology integration was not part of my course load. At that time, technology in the classroom was treated separately as the author describes. The prevailing attitude at the time was, “If you know how to use it and your school has the resources, go for it, but if you don’t know how to use to use and your school doesn’t have the resources, it’s not really necessary.” Currently, however, that is not true. It is a necessary component of education, not something supplemental or extra. The author offers many practical strategies for integrating technology in the English classroom, many of which I would like to research further and possibly implement in my own

The teachers in the video "An Introduction to Technology Integration" seemed really excited about the opportunity for technology integration in their classes. They went as far as saying that it could fundamentally transform a classroom and what you can do in it. One teacher suggested that if you are using the tools you have as well as you can then you are integrating technology. Our students today are creating using digital tools and we have become more like facilitators than a traditional teacher.

Acceptance among teacher has been a key factor in successful or unsuccessful technology implementation. Historically, the structure of the American education system has been resistant to any kind of change (Collins & Halverson, 2009). According to Blackwell, Lauricella, and Wartella (2014) teachers with more teaching experience have less favorable attitudes towards technology and use technology less often than teachers with less experience. Districts are making efforts to provide technology for students. The problem that McDermott and Murray (2000) found was despite access to technology, students and teachers were not using it. This could be attributed to many different factors.

As the Instructional Integration Technology Specialist, it is my role to teach, encourage, and provide ongoing support to classroom educators to integrate the resources and tools of technology into all subject areas. Technology is not a separate entity in the instructional learning process. It is just as significant and useful as a pencil in all of the major learning subject areas. In my position as the Instructional Integration Technology Specialist, I will be instrumental in providing authentic and needs driven training to educators begin to incorporate technology in their lesson plans. I have nine solid and successful years of doing this in a school, and with educators in the various other schools, in a major school district as a Technology Coordinator.

According to So and Kim (2009), teacher training and a support system with integrating technology in the instructional practice should be structured in a holistic way so that they can see the connection. Through assessment based on a full deliberation of interrelationships between content, pedagogy, and technology, teachers can anticipate constructive sound effects of technology integrated task through student academic performances. Papert, Vygotsky, Dewey and Piaget’s social constructivism (SC) principles

In order to implement an action plan that integrates technology and accommodates diverse student populations, I first create a shared vision using data gathered from observations, surveys, and interviews and researched literature and a Current Reality Report/SWOT Analysis report. The Current Reality Report/SWOT Analysis report demonstrates my ability to facilitate the design, development, implementation, communication, and evaluation of technology-infused strategic plans because I was able to design and develop a report using data from surveys and interviews from various stakeholders after evaluating the School District’s Three Year Technology plan as well as my school’s School Improvement Plan. Using the ISTE’s Essential Conditions for successful technology integration and the ISTE Lead & Transform Diagnostic Tool as a guide, I was able to determine that my school has weakness and threats that need to be

In classrooms today, it is important for teachers to use technology with their students, but only in a way that enhances the material being taught. For this reason, it is essential for teachers to understand the concepts of the TPACK framework. The TPACK framework includes technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and content knowledge. It is obvious that a teacher must know the specific content to teach and know how to teach it, but it is less obvious to note that they must know how to effectively integrate technology into their lessons in a way that will enrich student learning. Often times, teachers place technology into their classrooms through the use of PowerPoints, laptops, iPads, etc. and do not effectively use the technology in

With the integration of technology, students get direct, individualized instruction from the computer. This form of supplemental teaching allows them to engage with the information at times that are most convenient for them and helps them become more self-directed in the learning process. It also gives the teacher more time to accomplish classroom objectives, while freeing them up to help the students who might be struggling with certain lessons.

TPACK-L is UConn revision of an existing framework for teachers’ competency with technology that expands Mishra and Koeler’s TPACK framework by adding Learning Theory (Slota, Young, Choi, & Lai, 2014). Although the TPACK framework on which it is based proposed the way to understand how to integrate technology in the classroom as a unique body of knowledge, technology integration practice is, more often than not, thought of as a set of pedagogical skills or strategies to simply utilize technology in pursuit of effective instruction. Given the omission of learning theory from the teacher competency framework, it might mislead us to understand teacher competencies as merely a skill-based knowledge (i.e., teaching as a straightforward enterprise). Yet, teaching is a complex intellectual work necessary to have a solid understanding of the foundational theories and knowledge about learning that drives effective instruction (Wilson & Peterson, 2006). Furthermore, without understanding the learning theory that underlay a particular innovation of a technology-supported instruction (e.g., Papert’s Logo, CTGV’s Jasper Woodbury videodisc series, educational games/simulations like Quest Atlantis or River City Project), teachers’ technology integration can cause fatal mutations of the implementation, which means that their practices may end up with being in opposition to the theory behind the designed program, not doing what researchers intended.

The coursework I have completed through the Distance Educational Technology Masters Program at the University of Alaska Southeast (UAS), has immersed me in educational technology research supported by collegial discussions. Through the supervised field-based activities from the UAS program and my ongoing professional activities, I have developed a shared vision for the comprehensive integration of technology. Technology integration has been my priority focus academically and professionally. As I have developed a classroom environment conducive to the realization of my technology integration vision, I have shared my vision with families and educators in my school, district, and state.