Tribunals are not courts but they do operate alongside the court system and have become an important part of the civil justice system. Many tribunals were created with the development of the welfare state in the second half of the twentieth century. They were created in order to give people a method of enforcing their entitlement to certain social rights. However, unlike alternative dispute resolution (ADR) where the parties choose not to use the courts, the parties in a tribunal case cannot go to court to resolve their dispute. Instead, they must use the relevant tribunal.
The Role of tribunals
Tribunals are designed to enforce a person’s rights which have been granted to them through social and welfare legislation (Acts of Parliament). There are many different rights, such as:
• the right to a payment if you are made redundant from work;
• the right not to be discriminated against because of your sex, race, age or a disability;
• the right to a mobility allowance if you are too disabled to walk more than a very short distance.
The above is just a small selection of the types of ‘rights’ that tribunals deal with.
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
Remember tribunals were set up as the welfare state developed, so new developments resulted in a new tribunal being created. This led to more than 70 different tribunals being created. Each tribunal was separate and the various different tribunals all operated
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
Rights are a legal entitlement that people are either born with or obtain at a certain age and it requires certain
Human rights act 1998 – specifies and enforces the rights of individuals and if these
The advantage of choosing the tribunal system is that it is not strictly bound by the restrictions of rules of evidence and precedent. Although, tribunals are to some degree bound by the decisions of other tribunals they have a greater degree of flexibility in their decision-making powers. This in itself means that tribunals can give the appellant a greater chance of success especially since tribunals can admit evidence that a court might perhaps refuse to listen to, for example hearsay evidence.
Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general
Right to self-determination - If someone needs help to make decisions then decision-making should involve that person as much as possible
The right to decide one’s own fate within a fair social contract, unmolested by aristocracy or ruled by unjust laws.
‘Article 14 Discrimination’ (bbc.co.uk). This tells us that no one has a right to discriminate against anyone for any reason including race, colour, religion, sex and many other reasons. ‘Protocol 1 article 1’ (bbc.co.uk). This is a right to your possessions everyone is entitled to their possessions. ‘Protocol 1 Article 2’ (bbc.co.uk) this is a right to an education, no one should be deprived of their education. ‘Protocol 1 Article 3’ (bbc.co.uk). This is the right to vote, everyone has the right to vote with the freedom of their expression.
The human’s rights act is very useful within the UK because it lays down the law about what rights we have. It