The Cost-Effective Analysis of a Rotavirus Immunization Program for the United States
759 Words3 Pages
The “Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Rotavirus Immunization Program for the United States” article was performed to estimate the economic impact of a national rotavirus immunization program. The research question being addressed is if the implementation of a rotavirus vaccine program would be beneficial and cost effective. These are policy relevant questions because it will determine if a rotavirus vaccine program will be cost effective and valuable enough to employ. These research questions are not only relevant to healthcare providers, but doctors, hospitals, the vaccine users, and society as a whole.
Decision analysis is an appropriate method for this case study because the decision to be made is operations focused and not tactical, it is impartial rather than subjective, and it is repetitive rather than infrequent. Decision analysis looks to identify the most appropriate alternative outcomes and occurs at a give point in time in a process. Additionally, it takes the view point of the organization in decision making, opposed to an individual standpoint.
Date included in the study consisted of the number of doctor and emergency room visits, the number of incidences, rotavirus infections, mortality estimates, hospitalizations statistics, hospital discharge data, affected children, and vaccine coverage. Medical costs of the rotavirus are compromised of inpatient and outpatient treatment, room charges for hospitalization, emergency department care, vaccination
The “Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Rotavirus Immunization Program for the United States” was designed to estimate the economic impact of a national rotavirus immunization program. The research question and objective of the analysis was to determine if a rotavirus vaccine immunization program would be beneficial and cost effective. The study is policy relevant because it will determine if a rotavirus vaccine immunization program is effective enough for implementation and will assist in setting
A very controversial issue these days is whether or not to receive immunizations. I am a young mother and I tend to follow my mothers and doctors’ advice when it comes to mine and my children’s health, I feel as though my doctor has the best advice on how I can keep us all happy and healthy, however this is not the case for everyone. Many questions have arisen about immunizations and there are quite a few people who are either hesitant to or will not have themselves and their children immunized.
group of people that don’t mind exposing their children to serious harm; in recent years, many adults have decided against vaccinating their children. This is unusual, as vaccines are non-lethal, very safe protection for children; they are even cost-effective for their parents and are considerably safer for the entire family when these children are vaccinated routinely (Prosser, 1548). Jennifer Hamborsky of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention essentially describes vaccination as the administration
Vaccination policy Analysis
Adriana Ortega
Benjamin Tetteh
Ramona Abou Habib
Saera Sultana
PUAD 6260-01 Healthcare Policy Analysis
Professor Farida Sultana
July 27, 2015
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary 3
II. Introduction 4
III. Examination and Analysis of the Policy 5
A. Background 5
B. Involvement and Work of Lobbying Groups 5
C. Analysis: Pros and Cons 6
D. Analysis: Evaluation Methods 10
E. Outcomes 11
IV. Conclusion 12
References 13
I. Executive Summary
Vaccination policy
found that while 94% of individuals surveyed had vaccinated or plan on vaccinating their children, only 23% of participants had no concerns about the vaccines16. This reiterates the point that even though there are high rates of vaccination in the United States,
both supply and demand side interventions. Vaccine availability has been limited by the number of suppliers, high R&D and production costs, and safety problems leading to increased regulatory requirements. Demand has been constrained by rapidly increasing vaccine costs, financing issues that have constrained efforts to achieve targets set for population immunization rates, and parental attitudes regarding
additional operational headquarters in the USA Global presence: about 160 countries Primary markets: USA, France, Germany, UK, Italy and Japan Employees: approximately 103,000 GSK key figures for 2003 (in £ million) Sales 21,441 Materials and production costs 4,188 Marketing and administration 7,563 R&D expenditures 2,770 Operating income 6,920 Net profit 4,765 GSK has two main business divisions, pharmaceuticals and consumer