preview

The Effect Of Ethanol On The Concentration Of Ethanol

Better Essays

Figure 5 - Michaelis Menten Graph of Ethanol (pH 9.0) Representing the Velocity versus Substrate Concentration. Different concentrations of ethanol were used, and the absorbance reading taken through enzyme kinetics. The velocity was calculated through the conversion of the slope of the data points to abs/min. K_m was found to be 5.76×〖10〗^(-3) M, V_max 1.71×〖10〗^(-3) M/min, K_cat 2.85×〖10〗^(-2) 〖min〗^(-1), and K_cat/K_m 4.94 〖min〗^(-1) M^(-1).

Figure 5 - Michaelis Menten Graph of Ethanol (pH 7.2) Representing the Velocity versus Substrate Concentration. Different concentrations of ethanol were used, and the absorbance reading taken through enzyme kinetics. The velocity was calculated through the conversion of the slope of the data points to abs/min. K_m was found to be 7.66×〖10〗^(-4) M, V_max 8.84×〖10〗^(-4) M/min, K_cat1.47×〖10〗^(-2) 〖min〗^(-1), and K_cat/K_m= 19.2 〖min〗^(-1) M^(-1).

Table 4- Michaelis-Menten Kinetic Data [Original Experiment]
Buffer KM (mM) Vmax (µM/min) Kcat (min-1) Kcat/KM(min-1 M-1)
7.2 0.000766 0.000884 0.0147 19.2
8.5 0.00248 0.00231 38.4 155
9.0 0.00576 0.00171 0.0285 4.94
*Literature 7.05 26 1.03 N/A N/A
*Literature 8.1 18.5 0.5583 N/A N/A
*Literature 8.9 ~10 0.383 N/A N/A

*Literature values taken from Dickinson4 The Km data from table 4 suggests that a buffer of 7.2 has the highest affinity of ADH to the substrate, ethanol. This experimental data does not correlate with what was found in the literature in either values or trends of

Get Access