The Future Of A Post Brexit Britain Essay

Tony Blair introduced me to politics. Taken by my parents to protest in London against the Iraq war I experienced the inability of national politics and international relations to be mutually exclusive concepts. Key issues such as the growing refugee crisis, the debate regarding Britain’s place in Europe and trade agreements such as TTIP all have national and international implications. Britain’s political sovereignty has been eroded by Unions, Agreements and world events. This opens up the debate as to where power is concentrated. A more controversial debate would address whether national and global decisions are in fact being made by politicians at all, or if global corporations impose greater power. Regardless of this nihilistic view, the

Following WWII and during the Cold War, there was a sense of instability in Europe. To counteract this, many nations believed that a united Europe could suppress the intense nationalism and militarism that lead to both world wars. Other nations reacted with advocacy, protest or were simply equivocal. Post WWII Europe was extremely chaotic and disjointed. Alliances had been made and broken during the world wars, so tensions were at an all time high throughout the continent.

| |FOR ITS PLEDGE TO SIDE AGAINST ITS FORMER TRIPLE ALLIANCE PARTNERS. THE BRITISH EAGERLY SEEK

The world is in total chaos and despair. The newspapers are filled with headlines about nuclear fallouts, military attacks, religious fundamentalism - based terrorist attacks, backlash against refugees and immigrants, mass suicides, fatal fertility drugs, mosques being put under surveillance, allegations of tortures of journalists, medical malpractice, and bombs. Even though the British government is the sole

WWII has a ripple effect across the globe causing changes both internationally and domestically. Internationally, The sun finally began to set over the British Empire with the majority of her majesties colonial possessions gaining independence in the years following the war. Britain’s stage left exit from its hegemonic role resulted in the start of a new “Great Game” between two burgeoning superpowers. A new world order began to take shape with the United States and USSR vying to establish their own hegemony.

With the infamous “Brexit” vote in 2016, the United Kingdom’s (UK) separation from the European Union (EU) was only the start of the union’s eventual downfall. Upon exiting the EU, the UK also chose to leave the EU’s Single Market, causing friction for UK manufacturing firms. The Single Market Strategy removed internal borders and other regulatory obstacles between EU states in regards to trade. The function of the Single Market was to “stimulate competition and trade, improve efficiency, raise quality, and cut prices.” However, with “Brexit”, the UK lost rights to sell to into the European markets without discrimination. Huge tariffs were placed on EU imports that caused financial distress to

The outcome of the Brexit referendum in June last year came as a surprise to a lot of people, though surveys showed that the outcome would be close. It was predicted that ‘Remain' would win with a tight majority, yet, politicians underestimated the resentment British citizens had cultivated against the perceived domination of the European Union. Citizens voted to win back sovereignty, but as the recent negotiations show the United Kingdom has won anything but that. This essay analyses how the EU dominates Britain in the divorce negotiations by employing John Scott's theory of structures of domination. Access to the single market is the main incentive the EU offers Britain for accepting their conditions of the Brexit. This characterises the EU as the

This report will look at the benefits and issues surrounding the UKs decision to remain as a member state of the European Union (E.U.). Along with the newly elected conservative government, came the announcement that a nationwide referendum would be held, by the end of 2017, in order to determine the British public’s stance on the issue of EU membership.

In the past few months, the Brexit referendum attracted the attention from the whole world. The globalisation has made the world today far more connected than ever so that every country could be affected by this big event. The globalisation has had profound and lasting influences to UK economy. This essay will firstly focus on the pros and cons of globalisation, then discuss the UK sectors which benefited and suffered from globalisation respectively, finally analysis the overall effect of globalisation on the UK economy.

It is clear to any that the global role held by Great Britain has changed drastically since the Empire’s pinnacle during the Victorian Era. The nation is no longer imperialistic in nature, to the point where it would be highly questionable to refer to model day Great Britain as an “empire”. At first it is easy to assume that because Great Britain has continually lost or let go of its colonies and dominions and no longer has the worlds most powerful armed forces that its global influence would be exceedingly reduced. Global influence of a nation however is much more complex than strict landmass and military power. With the modern global economy imperialism is not necessary to preserve powerful economic influence, which in a largely capitalistic

For example, every country has different currency and different legislation. They follow different set of rules and the value of currency differs from one country to another. According to EU’s rule and regulations member states don’t pay extra tax because they are a part of single access market. But for example another country outside of EU needs to pay tax and there is cost involved when the products or goods cross borders. Since Norway, Iceland and Lichtenstein are not European Union’s member states they pay higher tax to enter in European Union area moreover they are entitled to follow their rules and regulation and their own tariffs. If UK decides to not to be a part of EEA or single access market they will be subject to trade barriers. As a result Britain will loss vast amount of profit which they made when they were part of EU.

Britain withdrawing the European Union has always been an ongoing discussion, one of the many goals pursued by some British political parties, along with groups of people and individuals. Leaving the European Union is a right that every country that is part of the Treaty on the European Union has (Article 50 of the treaty), and this is what the Conservative political parties that proposed the referendum are triggering to impulse a faster withdraw from the EU; specially the new prime minister Theresa May. There had been another referendum in 1975, but it resulted in

‘It was only because of the “special relationship” with the USA that Britain could exert an influence on international affairs in the years 1951 to 2007. ' Assess the validity of this view.

The United Kingdom, the gem of Europe, has offered more to the world than just a stable government model. It has proven to be successful economically and a professional when it comes to Foreign affairs. The United Kingdom is triple generator powerhouse consisting the best of the best from England, Wales, and Scotland. The United Kingdom is not only a revolutionary when it comes to the economy, but also in music, literature and sports.

In the world, several international organizations are created for peaceful relationship and benefits from each other. Recently, a big news from the United Kingdom has caused people in a panic. That’s its withdrawal from the European Union, an international organization comprising 28 European countries and governing common economic, social, and security policies. This decision is widely known as Brexit. This has affected the operation of the international business market between countries in Europe, especially the United Kingdom. Some people are happy about it and some do not. The trading and workers in the United Kingdom therefore have significant impacts related to the trade organization, trade barrier, arguments for trade Barriers, and imports.