The Importance Of Creativity In Education

Creativity is equally as important as literacy, and we need to start treating it that way in schools around the world. According to Ken Robinson’s claim in his, “How Schools Kill Creativity” speech, he believes this to be exceptionally true. All children are creative and talented, however, we have grown up in a world where we believe that it’s wrong to exemplify our creativity. Robinson uses both, pathos, and ethos to help make his claim. He arises emotion in you; he causes you to really think, to trust him, and to question ultimately, how things are being done in the educational system. We as a world have become so consumed with the idea of putting each child into a category of what they’re going to be successful in, regardless of their creativity or passions. You’re either good at math, science, or English; everything is based on your academic ability. What happens then to the people who aren’t academically smart, but are more creative? They are then made to feel that what they have to offer the world simply isn’t good enough, but the truth is, it is good enough. Over time however, we are taught out of our creativity. Schools around the world kill creativity by instilling a sense of fear in the child that what they are doing, and how they feel is wrong, this ultimately discourages them, and they fall victim to the industrialized educational system that we have present day. Robinson believes now more than

In the essay “Creativity in the Classroom” written by Ernest L Boyer, the essay talks about creativity in the classroom and what can affect or empower creativity to occur. At the beginning, the writer stated that if the students and the faculty did not work together to create a prosperous ambiance, and did not see that they are having an important thing to do, the effective education atmosphere will be minimized. Another point that the writer stated carefully was when the professor spoiled the book and the students did not react disappointed because they did not need to read the book they had the information’s that they need from the professor. Therefore, in my opinion, the writer point was that students need to get serious about their

In “Do School’s Kill Creativity?” published on Ted.com on February 2016, speaker Ken Robinson questions the effectiveness of our education system to facilitate creativity. To support his position, first, Robinson explains how creative and talented every child is, and that the education system is “educating people out of that creativity”. Next, he explains how the world’s education systems place all the emphasis on subjects deemed as useful for employment and academic abilities; consequently, talented, creative individuals believe they are not due to the schools not valuing or stigmatizing their talents. Finally, he speaks of intelligence, how diverse, dynamic, and distinct it is. Robinson ends with a statement that educators need to recognize

Creativity is important not only to the individual, but society as a whole. Creative minds are more likely to be innovators, think of new programs and regulations for our government, as well as being able to create art that can bring joy to others. In modern education, much of the standardized curriculum now taught in schools encourages convergent thinking instead of divergent thinking, which is the ability to have alternative solutions to a situation whereas convergent thinking has only one. These essential pieces of the education system set a basis for what students are expected to know and understand before leaving the grade level. This is important because it allows teachers and admissions to place students in the correct classes for their academic enhancement. Classes such as English Language Development, remedial, and even honors classes cater to the students’ lack of knowledge in particular subjects and help them develop in order to succeed in the next grade level. However, with the increase in standardized curriculum the creativity in children has declined.

Ken Robinson is a university professor who challenges the way we are educating our children. He uses passion and humor to emphasize the importance of creativity and the need for a learning revolution. From Ken’s personal experiences, he has concluded professors tend to only live from their heads, and “slightly more to one side”. Having these professors responsible to teach us what is right and wrong is no dought steering new generations views on what we should value. Creativity is becoming stigmatized, causing individuals to ignore many career paths and conform to our set standards. He states, “we don’t grow into creativity, we grow out of it. Or rather we get educated out of it”. There are so many more types of intelligence, however we categorize one above all. Potential talent is being wasted.

“It has become a mantra in education that No Child Left Behind, with its pressure to raise test scores, has reduced classroom time devoted to the arts.” This

“On Defining Creativity” is a dry and scholarly article written to persuade readers’ views regarding usage of the terms “creative” and “creativity.” The article is convincing, and uses logical reasoning combined with etymology to craft an argument. “How ‘Rock Star’ Became a Business Buzzword” is an observation (rather than an attempt to redefine a word like “On Defining Creativity”) that is entertaining and well-supported. Both articles are convincing in their own respects, each employing different techniques. However, the articles do not make conclusive statements: “On Defining Creativity” ends in a multitude of questions and a call for more thought on the term “creativity,” and “How ‘Rock Star’ Became a Business Buzzword” ends with a tale

I enjoyed reading your post and learning more about how you conduct language assessments on the students. I am doing a research paper on the Creative Curriculum in another class and have found it very interesting. The Creative Curriculum “is an early childhood curriculum that focuses on project-based investigations as a means for children to apply skills and addresses four areas of development: social/emotional, physical, cognitive, and language” (“What Works,” 2013).

According the most recent national assessment recorded in the Washington post, “the nations high school seniors have shown no improvement in math and reading performances since 2009.” In the most recent years, education has taken a huge downfall. Since 2010, over 45% of students drop out. Many students have problems with the grading system, so many different testing programs and having to follow a set of rules and not expand on those rules. The education system needs to induce more creativity, enforce the ways on how education is important and elaborate more on the rules of grading.

In this artifact, Creative Curriculum It refers to a curriculum in which program fosters learning through hand-on, exploration, active thinking, and experimenting to better understand the world, and how things work. The teachers use their own knowledge and other resources to design, implement, and evaluate meaningful, challenging curriculum that promotes comprehensive developmental and learning outcomes for every young child. Children are given the opportunity to be creative and active explorers. The creative curriculum also focuses on four areas of development: Social, emotional, physical, and cognitive. It also assesses children based on their age and stage of development. The creative Curriculum also encourages play. It is believed that children learn though play. For example, in the block area they learn about sizes, shapes and other mathematical problems.

In the United States, a select amount of schools have adopted a new curriculum that emphasizes creative analysis over critical analysis; education professionals believe students with better creative thinking will be better prepared to enter the job market. Debaters question whether schools should continue to teach creativity class or should they discontinue these courses due to their ineffectiveness? The discussion appears to be a policy debate: questioning what action the schools should take; however, the curriculum is receiving criticism from a variety of interest groups, which cause the debate not to be in stasis.

According to three paragraph the key argument that intrigue me: The Key argument identify is from the Olien reading, “We think of creative people in a heroic manner”. How does it resonate. People are bias against creativity. people who say they are looking for creativity react negatively to creative ideas, as demonstrated in a study from the University of Pennsylvania. Uncertainty is an inherent part of new ideas, and it’s also something that most people would do almost anything to avoid.

The term creativity is used for the purpose of describing the ability that is concerned with the process of creating something new or valuable. This ability allows a person to surpass the rules, practices, methods, forms or similar kind of activities that the traditional society may be performing at that time. Creativity is one of the most important things that have allowed the people of the society to move forward and urge for development. All the development that has been made in various aspects of human life can be directly connected with the creativity. All the industry leaders of the world have secured this place because of the level of creativity and innovation that they showed. They used this creativity for creating something new that has allowed them to develop completely new methods for this purpose.

Some say creativity is dying. Some say creativity is a thriving force that simply needs to be highlighted. However, majority say that creativity is needed. This need is due to the desire to stay innovated and distinguished from other countries in the world. For example, Richard Florida said, “Creativity at once is our most precious resource”. This shows how detrimental to our future Florida believes creativity is. However, people that share the beliefs of John Calhoun would see that creativity is important as an accessory to the science and math courses taught at colleges (Calhoun). Nevertheless, creativity is seen as a vital resource for the young adults of America because this type of intuitive thinking is seen as a necessity for future innovation. Therefore, in order to stay a global power, people are realizing that creativity, the art of thinking outside the box, should be taught in college education.

Imagination is an important aspect of childhood. Children are a different kind of creative than adults that can only be attained at their age. This type of imaginative thinking can be emphasized by reading the appropriate books. Children believe in ideas that seem outrageous to adults such as Santa Claus, the tooth fairy and Easter bunny, as well as magic and unicorns, and mermaids and monsters. These aspects make up a great deal of children’s book and are a major reason why children enjoy them. Fantasy style books should be used in the classroom