The Importance Of Information On The Collection Of Data

I would like to respond to the follow-up inquiry on behalf of Congressman Kennedy’s constituent John Hermans, received 27 June 2016, which is based on the original inquiry by Holly Hermans, dated 16 May 2016 with regards to her son Private John Hermans, who is assigned to Tango Company, 266th Quartermaster Battalion, 23rd Quartermaster Brigade at Fort Lee, Virginia.

In 2012, people discovered that the NSA had committed 2,776 violations to the law. The NSA was mainly spying on other countries while those other countries were spying on the United States.The U.S. government tried to explain why they did those infractions with the excuse that they were unintentional. The court ruled it as unconstitutional. As of now, the United States has collected every single piece of data that has been placed on the world wide web and is stored in a metadata machine.This means that anyone can have access to any piece of private information, just by looking it up on the internet. The only ways to fix that is by either monetizing all data or using a wrapper. The option of monetizing would people would surely benefit from this meanwhile, the corporations and the government would significantly loose their power.

The focus of our intelligence agencies to gather as much data as possible is completely wrong and has had lethal consequences, from 9/11 to 7/7 to Paris, Brussels and Nice. You don’t need all the data about everybody in the world to discover and react to threats. If you do try to gather such vast volumes of data, you flood your analysts, decision makers and police with garbage. They need the right data and they need it in time. The only way to get there is by upfront filtering for targets, which can be done through metadata – information about the sender, recipient and receiver of an email or phone call. That, in turn, has a nice side-effect: it gives privacy to more than 99% of people who are not known targets or demonstrating behaviour that

As Justin Brookman says, “‘Without a framework in place to assure everyday consumers of the ability to limit the collection and retention of the minutiae of their lives by unknown third parties, any sense of a realm of personal privacy may completely evaporate’” (Tapscott 119). There should always be some sense of mystery in the world. Third party sources often find a way of getting information that Internet users did not give them express permission to. The flow of information goes further than most people realize, which is where the dangerous invasion of privacy comes in. A sharing is caring mentality is all good and fun until a third party uses it against you. We should beware the extent to which our information can spread without our

Pro argues this is significant in a bad way as it gives companies a large amount of power. I’m not seeing it, perhaps pro could explain why a corporation having my information gives those companies power that results in a net negative. Furthermore, pro concedes that currently companies get this information when people post personal data on networking sites. Thus, people are already equipped with a way to reasonably prevent businesses from getting their data. Of course that is by not posting their information online. No one is forced to put such information on the internet. This solution turns out to be more effective than what pro is suggesting. Ultimately it is up to people as individuals to protect their own information. We do not need a nanny state to do something for us reasonably easy to do.

Metadata is used by the government to know all your secrets like emails, mobile phone, Facebook, and web browsers. Metadata is a software the government uses to identify what you are doing. I don’t think it is such a bad idea for the government to track your every moment. It’s not like they are following you around on foot and spying on you. It is just a control software they use to identify certain security features people use every

Not including alphabetic characters in a Social Security Number field is an example of _____.

Our digital age and its ' progressiveness create a problem. 25 years ago, the public was introduced to the web. Since then, many companies have taken the initiative to expand and control it. Entire companies now exist exclusively online. Other companies profit from consumers just using the internet. Companies provide the service and people pay for it, which seems simple in theory; however, most of those companies are not forthright with their data collection policies. They lack transparency. These companies collect the data for various reasons, the biggest is marketing research. They collect an exceptional amount of data, creating a problem for the consumer. One danger created is "the capability to combine data gathered through web interaction with public records and census data" (Ward, Rongione, and

Things you search for websites you visit, videos you watch, ads you click on or tap your location, device information IP address and cookie data (Google, 2018). Information retrieved by Google, offers a solution to both company and user. Independently my memory is not capable of retrieving history from two months ago, yet my Google search engine requires partial input to find my lost domain locations. Searching for competitive prices has become a simple task while using the Google search engine. Legally, it is the job of our state and local representative to regulate whether Google properly notifies user of their right to collect personal information.

Government surveillance in the past was not a big threat due to the limitations on technology; however, in the current day, it has become an immense power for the government. Taylor, author of a book on Electronic Surveillance supports, "A generation ago, when records were tucked away on paper in manila folders, there was some assurance that such information wouldn 't be spread everywhere. Now, however, our life stories are available at the push of a button" (Taylor 111). With more and more Americans logging into social media cites and using text-messaging devices, the more providers of metadata the government has. In her journal “The Virtuous Spy: Privacy as an Ethical Limit”, Anita L. Allen, an expert on privacy law, writes, “Contemporary technologies of data collection make secret, privacy invading surveillance easy and nearly irresistible. For every technology of confidential personal communication…there are one or more counter-technologies of eavesdropping” (Allen 1). Being in the middle of the Digital Age, we have to be much more careful of the kinds of information we put in our digital devices.

Personal data is quickly becoming a commodity in today's high technology world. This information is used by banks, investment and brokerage companies, credit card merchants, government agencies (local, state and federal), and consumer product-based companies. Most people probably don't realize the amount of information that's shared between companies, or how often it's done. Many companies sell and share customer data to help sell products and find out what new products they should produce. Other uses include gathering information about inventory levels to help better determine what types of products are bought at which store, when and how often. This can be used for inventory and production, to make sure that the store (or

Everyday our government plays a crucial role in our lives, including how we interact and communicate with others on the web and through social media. In recent years, governments have gained too much access to our personal lives by collecting our metadata. Several countries like the United States, Britain and Australia have all been known to be at fault for invading its citizens’ privacy by collecting involuntary information.

Personal privacy today is a controversial and complex topic, which is influenced by a number of factors. There is an integral role that databases play in this highly debated topic. The fact that many people now carry out their transactions electronically is another important factor. There is also pressure on personal privacy for increased national security around the world to combat terrorism. In addition, personal privacy is even threatened by commercial factors and the Internet.

During the first round of data collection, 48 recording sheets were distributed over four work days, three shifts per day, and four work areas per shift. There were 109 restocking times reported on the recording sheets. The mean was 7 minutes and 32 seconds. The median was 7 minutes and 37 seconds.

In general, there are several methods for data collection and the different data collection methods provided its own advantages and disadvantages (Sekaran 2003, p. 223). For carrying out the data collection, the appropriate methods should be applied. In the research, the data collection could be done through the interview, for example, face-to-face and telephone interview. To collect the data by using interview technique, the questionnaire is commonly employed as the instrument for gathering data, the questionnaire could be able to distribute by mail or electronic mail. In addition, the data collection could be conducted by observation of individuals with or without audio or video recording. Before choosing the methods for data collection the expertise of the researcher, the degree of accuracy required, time and resources must be taken into consideration. Thus,