The issue of gun control is one the most heavily debated topics in today’s society. With the increase in school shootings starting around the turn of the century, gun control advocates have been blaming guns instead of the deranged people for these heinous acts, and been calling for the banning of guns for civilian use. Gun control would be harmful in today’s day and age where people don’t have complete trust in the government and the police and where gangs are very prevalent especially in urban areas along with the growing number of school shootings over the last 20 years. We the people need to fight for our rights to bear arms to protect ourselves against our government and for personal protection of ourselves and the community. …show more content…
This shows that the 2nd amendment was created to protect ourselves against an oppressive government and for personal self defense. Any argument against is unconstitutional and infringes upon our rights. It makes sense to some people that since murder rates are so high nowadays, that banning guns would make the numbers much lower. That is certainly not the case when it comes to the United Kingdom, our close allies, when they created the Second Firearms Act of 1997. They created this law in response to the Dunblane massacre, where a man walked into an elementary school and shot dead 16 children, and one teacher before killing himself.The culprit committed these murders t with 4 handguns.People thought this act would help lower the murder rate but the results couldn 't be farther from what was expected. ,the rate of intentional murderin Dunblane in 1996(the year of the Dunblane massacre) was 1.12 per 100,000 people.It raised to 1.24 in 1997, the year the Firearms Act went into effect and went even higher to 1.43 in 1998. The rate rose to a peak of 2.1 in 2002 and has fallen since to 1.23 as of 2010. These lower numbers are questionable due to the possibility of underreporting of crime by U.K. police.. In 2005, there were 765 intentional murders in the UK and most of these were committed with knives.
Guns have been used throughout history for war, hunting, and protection. Since then, the killing capacity and speed of guns has improved dramatically. Guns have been a part of American culture from its roots. However, as times have changed and guns are no longer a necessity, gun control has become increasingly urgent to prevent unnecessary crime and killings. Guns should be banned for everyone but the law enforcement and military. Guns should be banned to prevent mass shootings and lower crime rates, while being supported by history and the constitution.
Gun control should not exist at all in the United States. Mass shootings have almost become seen as normal event in the United States. What people do not understand is that gun control is not the answer; there are countries with little to no control that have fewer shootings. According to The Washington Post,Finland is ranked number 4 in countries with the most guns despite that they only had 24 homicides by firearm (“Gun homicides and ownership by countries” n.pag.) . In the article Did Gun Control Work In Australia “it is shown that gun control has reduced the problems but it still has not completely got rid of all firearm deaths”(Matthews n.pag.). The number of murders, homicides, or suicides do not go up due to people just owning more guns. Clayton Perry, a staff writer at the University of Maine, even points out “Stricter gun laws were in place during the Assault Weapons Ban between 1994 and 2004, but that didn't stop the shooters at Columbine in 1999 ”(Perry n. pag.). In Iceland, thirty out of a hundred people own a gun and they have zero homicides caused by guns a year(“Gun Homicides and ownership by country” n. pag.). In this day and age, everything is unpredictable, guns are a form of protection for everyone and there should not be restrictions on protection. The U.S. Department of Justice released a data brief that states, “ On average in 1987-92 about 83,000 crime victims per year used a firearm to defend themselves or their property”(Rand BJS Statistician n. pag.). The National Sheriffs Association released that the average police response time is at eighteen minutes while the average school shooting only last twelve minutes (“Embracing Technology To Decrease Response Time” n. pag.). Gun control should not exist because other countries do fine without it , high gun ownership has no link with increasing death rates , and guns are not harmful when instructions are followed.
Gun control has been a big topic for the past decade in the united states. These debates will rise and fall time in and time out after something horrific happens in the state. Anti-Gun supporters do not realize that it is extremely difficult to regulate something in the states that is a big portion of our economy.Would stricter gun laws change anything? So far statistically It has been proven otherwise one must consider how a citizen would defend themselves when they are faced with terror. How will they defend themselves if there are restrictions on guns? It seems that some states that have stricter gun laws are where the most shootings and also where more terrorists attack take place. It seems that gun control is only pushed when shootings gradually get worse and worse. But why are these anti gun groups not speaking up when police brutality happens or when a racial hate crime occurs? Anti-Gun groups do not look at the bigger picture and try to understand that it is more than guns. Gun control almost plays Zero role in murders
The second amendment, not only a right in the United States but today it is
The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and per capita number across the globe. The current public gun control debate in the United States seems to be placed on standby until it is sparked up by a major mass shooting. There were at least 126 mass shootings between January 2000 and July 2014.(pro). Opponents of more gun laws accuse supporters of using a horrific event to further a lost cause, saying that more laws would not have prevented the shootings. Advocates of more gun control often want more laws to try to prevent the mass shootings and call for smart gun laws and background checks . Pew Research Center did
Ultimately, this comes down to which solution can fit best between the two groups of those that want guns and those that don’t. A solution that can be in favor of both sides is introducing guns into our children education at school. Not an education use obviously, but on how dangerous it is and what mechanisms to identify when they
Americans realize that the 10 Amendments produce the Bill of Rights which were made to prohibit government powers from infracturing the basic individual liberties; therefore, the changing of one of the Amendments would offset the basic individual liberties granted by the founding fathers. Countless U.S. news stations and support groups portray the mass shootings, gun violence, other gun propaganda, or naturally the use guns, as a scapegoat to support gun control. Guns do not harm people--people hurt people (And I have no doubt that this has been aforementioned extensively) however; the implementation of gun control in the U.S. will diminish the 2nd Amendment--the right to bare arms--as well as prevent the citizens the right to protect
The matter of gun control has become an increasingly controversial issue. Whenever, a nationalized tragedy ensues that involves gun violence, the question on what to accomplish regarding America’s gun control takes center stage. While exploring this topic, this essay will attempt to discuss the circumstances that prohibit a person from possessing firearms, also regulations to prevent these persons from possessing firearms. Upon reflecting on the personal side of the gun control debate, stricter gun control begins to infringe upon our rights, as citizens and they should concentrate on enforcing the current laws in the books, instead of making additional laws.
The last misconception is that the gun control works because of the lower murder rates witnessed in the foreign countries. In the wide array of nations and cultures, the suicide or murder rates cannot be correlated to the control laws as shown by the facts even though this is one of the favorite arguments by the gun control proponents. Guns can be easily obtained in Switzerland and Israel for instance whereby every law abiding citizen can get the license to posses the gun. The homicide rates
When one comes to count on the pros and cons of gun control there comes many points in mind, one of them being diminished murders by guns: There is some trustworthiness to the possibility that substitution systems for crime by firearm are less deadly and hence diminishment or expulsion of weapons ought to decrease manslaughter rates marginally. The issue is whether somebody needs you dead sufficiently awful they tend to ensure they completed the employment and in spots where weapon bans have become effective they have had no measurably critical
Gun control has become an increasingly controversial topic in the nation due to the continuous debates relating to gun control and whether or not laws should be passed to make it harder for guns to be obtained. Guns serve for a variety of purposes that range from good to bad. Guns are not for everyone. Some individuals cannot handle guns properly, and some choose to use guns inappropriately. Lately, guns have become more of a problem in our society. There has been an increasing amount of shootings that have taken many lives and have wounded people emotionally, not just physically. Although guns are used for protection, firearms are reportedly used more in crimes. More and more shootings are breaking out across the nation. As a result, the
One main issue in the Americas is the problem of gun control and if guns should be allowed. Many Americans will argue that since it is allowed in the Second Amendment there should be no argument that the people should be allowed to own guns. Others will say there should be gun control because many crimes committed are with guns. On the other hand it could be seen as criminals still finding some way of getting guns albeit through smuggling or some other way of obtaining guns which would lead to more issues because Americans wouldn 't be able to defend themselves. The issue of gun control has been a very controversial topic and has been going on for many years.
Gun control has been an ongoing issue that has been debated about numerous times in Congress. Over the years, the seriousness of the issue has increased drastically since some recent events. When the Columbine High School massacre occurred in April 20th, 1999, gun control was beginning to become a heated topic to discuss about. Then, 13 years later another mass shooting occurred in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14th, 2012. This one was one of the worst shootings in American history. This increased the intensity of the debate and was one of the most talked topics by Congress during the few months shortly after. To limit any sort of tragedy from occurring, we need to stress gun control. Gun control should be implemented since it will likely,
Although guns have been used in the act of committing a lot of crime in the country, they have also been used to prevent a lot of crime and are one of the largest crime preventers. Many other countries in the past have put a ban on firearm weapons to try to prevent crime and other various reasons. It has been shown through research and studies that these countries who banned firearms have suffered from much more crime within their countries after the ban. This means that with control of guns comes no good effects on crime only increasing the amounts from before (CPRC). It has also been proved that where right-to-carry laws are permitted crime rates drop in numerous amounts. While support for strict gun-control laws usually bas been strongest in large cities, where crime rates are highest, that's precisely where right-to-carry laws have produced the largest drops in violent crimes(Lott). Gun prevention laws clearly do not stop crime but only contribute to more violence.
The controversial issue of gun control is one of the most debatable topics among politicians and civilians alike. This is because of the complexity of gun control and the long history that is related to the subject. Gun control is typically an effort, by the government, to create legislation that regulates the sale and use of firearms within the country. There are various arguments that surround this topic which include gun-related violence, accidents, self-defense, murders, suicide, constitutional rights, and so on. James Q. Wilson, a professor who has taught at Pepperdine University, Harvard University, and the University of California, Los Angeles, and a published author of several books, take a negative stance on the subject of gun control. Wilson contributed to the gun control debate in the last few years with his written op-ed article. According to Wilson, there is no possible method to eradicate the hundreds and millions of guns that exist within the country, restrictive gun laws will not significantly affect the United States’ murder rate, and that guns play an important role in self-defense in everyday lives. Contrary to what Wilson believes, strict gun control is necessary and should be enforced to ensure public safety because gun laws have the power to produce a positive outcome in the long run, reduce gun-related violence, and reduce the numerous risks that gun ownership open.