2. INTRODUCTION Andres Martiz Jr.'s "The Last Supper To Go" sits low on the wall of the Florida Gulf Coast University Art Lab, just above the floorboards. It stands in stark contrast to the plain white wall behind it, attached there by two golden chains and two nails. The actual print of The Last Supper rests on a board with four wheels, not quite parallel to the wall. The visible image of The Last Supper is actually a reflection on a mirror fastened against the wall. The viewer must get quite close to the work in order to discern what the mirror is reflecting. 3. RESPONSE My initial response to the work was intrigue. Most of the other works in the room were set at eye level, and if they did reach to the floor your eyes were not drawn there first. I actually almost missed the work …show more content…
The primary thing the eyes are drawn to is the golden frame with four large wheels attached. After that has been taken in, the viewer then notices the mirror reflecting the famous Da Vinci interpretation of the biblical Last Supper. The gold of the mirror contrasts vividly against the dark colors of "The Last Supper". The print is of the restored version of the painting, so that the shock and anger on each face of the disciples is crystal clear. The mirror warps the natural light and shadow of the painting, reflecting so that attention is attracted to certain parts of the painting depending on the lighting of the room. It also provides new chiaroscuro to that already present in the painting. Judas Iscariot, the disciple positioned lowest in the painting horizontally and also cast in the deepest shadow to indicate his betrayal, is cast into the reflected light of the mirror. There are far too many elements of the last supper alone to discuss in one thousand words, let alone as part of another work, so I will attempt to focus on the major
As the viewer’s gaze lingers on this central image, his/her eyes reluctantly and painfully follow the path of the crimson red blood that spurts out of Christ’s body and so naturally trickles down his arms into a pool at the base of the cross. The red bole that seeps through the cracked gold background seems to intensify this action. The pale grayish hue of Christ’s tortured skin morbidly conveys his lifelessness.
Leonardo's The Last Supper depicts the sequence of events before Jesus's betrayal and crucifixion. Rather than merely a snapshot in time, The Last Supper seems to be a continuous sequence of events, and a foreshadow of events to come. Two interpretations of the subject of the painting come to mind: the betrayal announcement and the first communion. Observing the impulsive Simon Peter's interactions with Judas and John, Jesus and Thomas, it is clear that The Last Supper represents a conjoint presence of both the betrayal announcement and the institution of the Eucharist.
First of all, The painting of “The Last Supper “by Ugolino di Nerio, shows the twelve apostles sitting across from and besides Jesus Christ, the painting looks very crowded, as the ceiling and the walls are very close, with extreme proximity between Jesus and the apostles. The painting by Nerio is shown as if the scene was enacted in a closed room with no windows and no sunlight, Also, the heads on some of the apostles, look like it is twisted to the other side of their bodies, there is no gap to show a smooth head turn to the right or to the left. Nerio’s painting shows, eleven out of the twelve apostles exhibiting a golden circular plate or crown
The Count’s Last Supper: La Gran Granja Throughout the film, the Count seeks to be recognized as a kind of Christ figure, identifying with the slaves as his loyal disciples. In this way, he deliberately chooses to overlook the relationship of labour with his slaves, created by the same economic necessity he claims to abhor. He cloaks the slaves in the assumption of their apostleship but addresses them as slaves and grants one of them his “freedom”, seemingly ignoring their awareness of the difference between instrumental and absolute freedom. He justifies their enslavement on the basis of their own “animal natures”, and seeks to convince himself that their labour is an instinctual, almost animal labour. But the slaves are aware, to varying
The Sacrament of the Last Supper by Salvador Dali is a large painting in the National Gallery of Art. In the painting there a twelve sided, windowpane. The larger windowpane is broken up into
Throughout the course of the last couple of weeks, we were assigned a finite list of readings that enveloped in us writing responses to said readings, along with the occasional showing of periodic movies that encompassed what we had learned in Latin America. These readings and movies helped shed light on problems ravaging the newly found colonies for instance; in “Camila”, the main protagonist was Camila who lived in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the 19th century when Rosas was governor and a very prominent Caudillo. She fell in love with a pastor and they eloped, prompting Rosas and Camila’s father, Adolfo, to hunt them down and ultimately execute them for disobeying, even though Camila was 8 months pregnant. In “The Last Supper”, the story took
The book compares and contrast different artists’ the last supper. The story of the last supper is from the Bible, so different people have different opinions. Andre Chastel collects them together and analyzes them in details. The last supper is one of the artwork compare with the Virgin of the Rocks, so it helpful to have a better understanding of the last supper.
<br>At the bottom left side of the painting is a man about to be eaten by a termite who has a game table on his head. This is illustrating that the tables are turned on the man who has committed some terrible crime. In the Inferno this is represented by Lucifer eating the three worst sinners, Judas Iscariot, Brutus, and Cassius, all who betrayed their
The Last Supper (found in gospels Matthew, Mark and Luke) is the final meal that jesus shared with his disciples before his crucifixion. The Last supper was presented like a passover meal, traditional hymns were sung, and traditional prayers were spoken as Jesus passed around the matzot (passover bread). Among these Jewish traditions Jesus added the words while breaking the bread “This is my Body, which will be given up for you” and while passing around the wine Jesus said “This is my blood, which will be poured out for you”. From these words and actions, stems the creation of the Eucharist that we know today. In the view of the passover, Jesus became the sacrificial lamb, his blood covered the wood of his crucifix just as the sacrificial
To start The Last Supper was supposed to be a modest wall decoration, but Leonardo was able to turn it into a revolutionary artistic composition of The Last Supper. Leonardo chose to depict the moment when Christ declared that one of them will betray him. The Apostles gathered around the table with Jesus shocked and St. John couldn't believe the news and fainted, even St. Peter was so angered that he pulled out a knife. In this painting, Judas is shown on the same side of the table as Christ, never before has this happened in history. Judas is being shown on the same side of the table as christ, but it is shown that he is leaning away betraying his guilt to the viewers.
This painting depicts the scene from the Bible known as the last supper, where Jesus and his twelve disciples ate their last meal together before Jesus died. Dali is not the only artist to paint this famous scene, Leonardo Da Vinci, along with many other artists, created their own version as well. The difference is that Dali used his surrealism background to create this scene in a completely unique way. Instead of painting the twelve disciples of Jesus as individuals, Dali painted them symmetrically so that each man had another mirroring the same pose across the table. This element, along with placing the setting of the last supper in a dodecagon and showing the beautiful background, creates a calm and peaceful environment for the disciples to pray. Dali also created two focal points in this painting, while most artists tend to only choose one. The floating torso is obviously the surrealist element of this painting, but also completes the message that Dali is communicating. Though the three elements, symmetry, setting and focal points, Dali created a completely unique rendition of the last
The strong red of her robe stands out as compared to the earth tone coloured clothing that are worn by the rest. Even though the man beside her is almost wearing the same coloured top, it is hidden under some kind of a vest and is further darken by the way his body is positioned away from the light. The woman, on the other hand, is shown without much covering her red robe and the light, that seems to be directly on her, enhanced the colour to be brighter. There is also a reference to Leonardo Da Vinci's The Last Supper as Jesus, the emphasis of the painting, was also wearing
Another difference is the time period the painting were created. The Last Supper was painted in 1495-1497, long before any of us were thought of. Interior was painting in 1981, this was around the same time our older siblings were being brought up or even some of our parents. There is about 484 years between when each painting was painted. The next difference in the two pieces is the subject. In The Last Supper the subject is easy to spot, Jesus is right in the middle of the painting for all eyes to be on him. If you look up the meaning behind the painting you begin to understand why da Vinci created this piece in the first place. The Last Supper was the last supper Christ had with his Apostles in Jerusalem before he was crucified. I feel like the meaning has a lot to do with the subject. As you read more into paintings history, you understand more about that painting. Interior has a while different subject, but it might not be easy to spot at first. You have to do more research to find out the subject. The painting is a copy of Adolf Hitler’s office of state. I believe that the subject is the fire in the middle of the room. The reasoning for the first in the room is said to be an
In 2006, I was watching The Da Vinci Code with my friend, Lucy. At such young age I could hardly understand the complicated situation. The only thing I could remember was the vivid images and all those amazing art pieces. However, this was also my first time to look at this remarkable art work: Last Supper.
that AIDS was the cure for this disease. They quickly poured him a glass of