For each of us, knowing our personality type and temperament allows us to leverage our strengths and to recognize areas of weakness. This can also be extended to our interactions with others, so that we attempt to recognize the personality and temperaments of those around us, i.e. Typewatching, in order to facilitate more efficient and effective communication. In so doing, we can become better employees, managers, spouses, children, and, ultimately, for the Christian, more like Christ. The Myers-Briggs Personality Test can provide a general overview of one’s personality type as a starting point to positively influence organizational behavior. Myers-Briggs Personality Test Project For each of us, knowing our personality type and temperament allows us to leverage our strengths and to recognize areas of weakness. This can also be extended to our interactions with others, so that we attempt to recognize the personality and temperaments of those around us, i.e. Typewatching, in order to facilitate more efficient and effective communication. In so doing, we can become better employees, managers, spouses, children, and, ultimately, for the Christian, more like Christ. According to Kroeger, Thuesen & Rutledge (2002), “there is practically no limit to the applications of Typewatching at work, from individual problem solving to restructuring entire companies” (p. 9). Requirement 1 This exercise has allowed me to characterize my overarching preferences in the four
The Myers and Briggs Analysis is a series of questions that when answered are examined and grouped together in order to determine the personalities of those taking this test. This particular test can result in sixteen different outcomes or types of personalities, which is determined by four different categories that judge if you are introverted or extroverted, use your senses or your intuition, your choice to think or use your feelings, and finally if you are judgmental or perceptive. These series of questions are designed to judge our personalities and help us to determine which career pathways we will be most suited for based on our personality traits and abilities to work well with others, which is important
The world would be a lot better of a place if everyone got along and knew how to communicate effectively with one another. There are several different personalities at any given workplace. “According to typological theory, each of us is born with a predisposition for certain personality preferences” (Kroeger pg11 para4). The Myers-Briggs Personality assessment is the most effective way to determine one’s personality type. The test uses different markers to determine how one is stimulated and exerts energy, gather information, make decisions, and living structure. At the completion of the test one will get personality type that is comprised of four letters. The test was developed based off of Carl Jung and Isabel Briggs-Myers’ psychological research on personalities and later dissected into Otto Kroeger’s book, “Type Talk at Work.” This book gives one the tools to determine what one’s personality is and then goes into great detail about one’s strengths and weaknesses and how it applies to to real life situations. My personality description is ENFP; Extravert, iNtuitive, Feeling, and Perceiving. The following are details regarding and ENFP personality type examining a holistic view including personal and work place interactions. Everything is based on insights gained from real world experiences and interactions.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the results of my Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test. With knowledge of my personality type I explain what I learned from these tests with examples from the book Type Talk at Work. The first part of the discussion explains each letter in the INTJ personality and an overall description of how the different parts of the personality work together. The second part of the discussion talks about lessons learned from using the personality tests. This part discusses what I learned about myself that could make me a better employee and what I learned about these personality tests that could make me a better employee. What is learned is supported with the material from the book Type Talk at Work. Throughout the paper there are examples on how this information can lead to improvements in relationships, improvements to yourself, and improvements to those
After completing the Jung Typology Test, and the Four Temperaments exercise, I have discovered what exactly my personality traits are and I have narrowed down what some of my strengths and weaknesses are based on a human metrics scale. Throughout this paper I will be discussing the Four Temperaments which are relevant to my test scores being, Extravert, Intuitive, Feeling, and Judging and how both my strengths and weaknesses in those temperaments can relate to my everyday work life. I will show those strengths and weaknesses by giving examples and researching which will show validity to why I scored what I did on the Jung Typology Test. Throughout this paper I will also be discussing the NF- “The Idealists” style and how being categorized as, “The Teacher” or “The Giver” type is fitting to my lifestyle. Lastly, I will reference the “Type Talk at Work” textbook in discussing what role I play in my organization and how I can better understand why my personality traits have such a major impact on who I am, how my co-workers view me and what I’ve learned. In conclusion, the Jung Typology Test and the Four Temperaments exercise will ultimately allow me to grow as a member in my organization.
The obvious fact is that I am in total agreement with the result of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator exercise. The knowledge of different personality types helps in future groups’ interaction, as one turns to value and appreciate differences between people. This exercise will help in dealing with future group mates who would behaves oddly and succeed more in engaging group members offering different affections. The exercise has further consolidated my skills in tackling team assignment contributions more effectively by leveraging my noted personality shortcomings. Noting that my personality encompasses a persona of a quiet observer until a problem appears, setting
Who would have known that four letters can describe a person in complete detail! The Myers Briggs Personality Test can explain your own personality better than you ever thought you could. My personality falls under ESTJ, which stands for extraverted, sensing, thinking, judging. ESTJ 's are usually hard workers that use logic and tradition to complete things efficiently while staying organized. They tend to be very stable people that remain loyal, dependable, and active. They enjoy creating things around the house, volunteering in the community, as well as watching and playing sports. ESTJ 's are known to be great leaders, often times employed as an engineer, doctor, manager, consultant, technician, or agriculturist.
For the Myers Briggs personality test I am an ISTP when I am stress and when I am at my best. I was surprised with these results due to the fact that my freshman year in the Harold Leadership Academy I was required to take the Myers Briggs assessment and scored the letters INFJ. I find myself leaning more towards INFJ because the test was at least seventy-five questions. When reading the definitions of ISTP and INFJ I find that I would agree with my personality having a little bit of both. The Myers Briggs Foundation states that INFJ individuals are insightful about others, seek to understand what motivates others, committed to their values, desire to sever the common good, organized, decisive, and seek meaning and connection in ideas, relationships, and material possessions. An example of how I am an INFJ is that I have chosen a healthcare career that is holistic and identifies what motivates others. I tend to over think situations, conversations, and how I reacted to them. I truly care about the people in my life and I know I pay attention to others especially in class and if they look down I typically ask how they are doing, which allows for them to open up if they wish but also it is how I acknowledge that I see them and care. The Myers Briggs Foundation states that ISTP individuals are tolerant, flexible, quiet observers, analyze what makes things work, organize facts using logical principles and attentive to cause and effect. I would firmly agree with the quiet
The Myers-Briggs Personality Test is discussed in two steps. In Step 1, the results of my Myers-Briggs Personality test are discussed while going into detail about each letter. Real life examples are provided for context of each letter. The weaknesses of each letter are also discussed. In Step 2, the lessons learned about how it relates to organizational behavior and to my specific organization are discussed.
Personality tests serve as effective facilitators to learning about the features of an employee and potential benefits and drawbacks that he or she may encounter at a given position. Legitimacy of the social media “which character are you?” personality assessments is questionable, because they do not provide credentials for their authors, statistical tools implemented, and no connection can be traced between the types of questions and the results of the test. However, such tests as the one based on the Carl Jung’s and Isabel Briggs Myers’ typology suggest a profound background for considering them valid. As such, after completing this type of personality test, I received the same results as in the official Myers-Briggs Personality assessment, which it was not. So, my personality type is ISTJ, which interprets as “Introverted Sensing Thinking Judging” based on the available non-official
personality types, behavioural styles theories, personality and testing systems - for self-awareness, self-development, motivation, management, and recruitment
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a popular tool used to indicate a person’s personality type and the sequence in which they perceive the world. In Pittenger’s (2005) article he disagreed with the validity of the MBTI and wants people in the workplace to be leery of using it to determine the abilities of current and future employees. His views came across as arbitrary due to the fact that he thinks that the MBTI claims to have omniscient abilities and then proceeds to argue why it is untrustworthy. The MBTI, is an in-depth personality test, but it cannot stand up to Pittenger’s trifling criticisms, nor can any personality test; however, this does diminish the validity of the MBTI.
Allport defines personality as ‘the dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychological systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment’ (Allport, 1937). An individual’s unique personality traits and attributes are a powerful indicator of how he/she will interact with the work environment. The difference between average and outstanding employees can often be solely personality related. As the employee is the most valuable asset to the company, ‘selecting the right employee during the process is critical’ (Carbery and Cross, 2013, pp. 41-53)
It has been said that every human being has Personality Type and temperament that shape who they are and determines their relationships at work, school, and home and with spouse. It goes further to predict their future, sort of, with respect to our career and occupational choice, such as scientist, thinkers, artist, and so on. So in this project I will be receiving my four-letter type and two-letter Temperaments by completing the Myers-Briggs Personality Test. It is not at all surprising that as people of different characters, ideas, personalities, and sizes are sharing the same world, we need something to make sense why we are the way we are, and the why psychological testing was invented in 1927 to help in answering this questions. Based
The author of this article explains how his wife forced him to take Myers-Brigs type test. As he answered each question with his wife, he notice that there are questions he would answer that his wife thought was incorrect. He explains his thoughts and experiences while taking the self-assessment test. He disagrees on how the test labels people in organization based on their personality. He explains that curiosity a great way in understanding people. “True understanding comes from not knowing. Real connection comes from not knowing. Brilliant innovation and problem solving comes from not knowing” (Bregman, 2015, par.5). He explains labeling something will diminish the way we get to know a person.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the results of my personality test on 16Personalities.com. The following paper describes the results of my test, as well as what I learned from the detailed reports of my personality type INFJ-T (Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging-Turbulent). In her article, Rajagopal states that, “the type indicator provides self-confirming insights and helps make patterning of human behavior understandable and acceptable” (2008). My personality test taught me not only about my personality, but also about my values, attitude, motivation, and decisions. I also learned several things relating to my ability to work with others.