More than 100 million animals are killed in the United States annually for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven testing, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal testing in America has lasted for many years. It has long been viewed as a way to find cures for human diseases and test the safety of consumer products. However, animal testing is very costly and wastes time compared to other options. Many test subjects even die due to experiments. Human anatomy is also very different from animals’, so test results are not always accurate. Animal product testing should not be performed because it is more expensive and time consuming than other alternatives, ineffective as humans are not genetically parallel to test …show more content…
This is because invitro testing allow for much more specific tests. For example, Corrositex is an invitro test that determines chemical corrosivity. This test replaces testing performed on rabbits. Unlike animal testing which usually takes about two to four weeks, Corrositex testing can provide results in as little as three minutes and no longer than 4 hours (InVitro). Additionally, one customer even saved $50,000 annually just on shipping costs. Another alternative for animal testing is to use stem cells for testing. Stem cells are cells which can be made in laboratories from embryos or adult tissue. By using stem cells, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are able to test accurately on what their target is, people. These companies have to test their drugs for toxicity in humans, not animals. When companies use stem cells for testing, they are quickly able to test new chemicals and compounds to assess their drug toxicity (Murnaghan). Another benefit of stem cells testing is that these tests allows for test related to ethnic diversity. Sometimes drugs must be tested to see their effects on ethnic subgroups. Since animals don’t have ethnic diversity of humans, it is impossible to test these effects on them. However, with stem cells, it is easy to develop cells of specific ethnicity to test for the effects of chemicals. Overall, stem cells testing in
There is no alternative that works as good as animal testing. “Pro Con Arguments” says that studying a smaller cell in a petri dish is sometimes useful but is not as helpful as testing on an actual complex structure, like an animal. They also say that animals must be used to prevent the need of using humans as subjects. When testing medicines that could cause harm or fatal events, humans should not be at risk of injury or in some cases, death. ¨American women use an average of 12 personal care products a day, so product safety is of great importance.¨ Animal testing is needed for these products to ensure the safety of the consumers.
Acute toxicity and even worse procedures are among this statistic. Not only are these procedures painful, but are also wasteful. Although at first these seem like good ideas, that’s hardly the truth. The truth behind just how reliable and useful animal testing is, may or may not surprise
“For as long as medical science has existed, animal experimentation has played a major role in research.” (Parks 9) When animals are in trials they are forced to eat and inhale substances, are exposed to harsh chemicals, and their organs are removed to observe internal effects (Yashiki 1). Millions of mice, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are being used for experimentations across the United States (Animal 1). Primates will be tested on if there is a scientific question that can not be answered by using other animals (Parks 25). Animals can spend their entire lives being studies because they have such short life spans (Parks 10). Up to 92 percent of the drugs that are tested on those animals and were considered safe will be proved unsafe in human trials (Yashiki 12). The FDA requires that any new drug be tested on animals first to determine the impact it will have on the human body (Parks 11). Although scientists are primarily the one's who test on animals, they also have been trying to make new ways of testing products (Yashiki 4). Researchers have discovered ways of creating cell and tissue models that replicate those of humans. These models can be used in place of mice, rats, rabbits, etc. (Alternatives 4). Testing on animals, especially in the medical research department, can be beneficial. It has helped provided safe drugs and panaceas to people
Almost every medicine that can be found in an average person’s medicine cabinet has been tested on an animal at one point or another. A government funded corporation called the Food and Drug Administration, abbreviated as the FDA, is in charge of making sure that all drugs, cosmetics, biological products, and more are efficient, secure, and safe for human usage. The FDA will not allow any drug to be released or sold to the human population if it has not first been tested on animals. In fact, when a drug is first created it is tested on animals before humans are even allowed to test the drug at clinical trial centers. Whether or not animal testing should be done for scientific purposes, has been a widely argued topic for many years
Even though animals are living organisms, studying cell cultures over animals can provide more accurate results because human cells are used. “Artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert, is made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells and can produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin.” ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org.") Also, some materials tested on the animals are never used for anything useful, the money, time, and pain wasted. It would be much more humane to experiment on human cells, rather than have innocent animals die, suffer, and remain in captivity in vain. “The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually see approval or public consumption and use.” ( Murnaghan) Also, testing on animals is an expensive way to experiment with products. Caring for the animals, and also breeding, buying, and selling them, can prove to cause it to be one of the more costly forms of experimenting. “Animal testing generally costs an enormous amount of money, as the animals must be fed, housed, cared for and treated with drugs or a similar experimental substance.” ( Murnaghan)
According to the National Institutes of Health, animal testing has been around since the days of philosopher Aristotle. According to ProCon.org, there are an estimated 26 million animals used for scientific and commercial testing in the U.S. alone. Animal testing has brought many good things to the medical world, such as the treatment various disease. Also, the animal is being tested by many cosmetics companies. On the other hand, organizations like PETA- People of Ethical Treatment of Animals have fought against the medical testing of animals. There are pros and cons that come with the usage of animals in the biomedical and cosmetic testing, and each side needs should be carefully examined before deciding one way or another.
In 2014 a group organization called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) noted that more than 100 million animals are harmed or killed during animal testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being used for medical testing, but are not being cared for before, during, or after testing. Animals and humans are very similar, in that we have the same organ system which performs the same tasks in a similar fashion. Even though animals and humans share comparable DNA, we fail to see the similarities in physical and emotional pain that animals endure during testing. Subjecting even one animal to that type of cruelty, all in the name of science is one too many.
Over one hundred million animals every year die from animal testing, in the medical and cosmetic fields alone (“Experiments on Animals: Overview”). Animal testing is as big of a problem today as it has been in the past. Most people do not agree with animal testing today but years ago it was one of the only ways of testing. It was considered, if not the only, effective and efficient ways of testing a product’s toxicity. To date, animal testing is not warranted because of the development of new technology and past discoveries. Many organizations and brands publicly oppose animal testing. The companies that stand against animal testing are broad and diverse, ranging from medical to cosmetic testing, advocating that at its core, this issue is
Over one hundred million animals every year die from animal testing, in the medical and cosmetic fields alone (“Experiments on Animals: Overview”). Animal testing is as big of a problem today as it has been in the past. Most people do not agree with animal testing today but years ago it was one of the only ways of testing. It was considered, if not the only, effective and efficient ways of testing a product’s toxicity. To date, animal testing is not warranted because of the development of new technology and past discoveries. Many organizations and brands publicly oppose animal testing. The companies that stand against animal testing are broad and diverse, ranging from medical to cosmetic testing, advocating that at its core, this issue is
Have you ever wondered how it would feel to be forced to do things against your will? Every year more than 100 million animals suffer each year. They are forced to eat, get physically hurt, and overall being traumatized. Despite animals not being exactly like humans, they still feel the same pain and emotions as us. Animals should not be used in medical testing or product testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane with animals being forced to do things they wouldn't want to do.
Do you think that animal testing is economically sound? Animal testing is wrong for the
The animals involved in the testing of chemicals on animals are often living in appalling conditions and being treated awfully. One of the main reasons people think testing on animals is better than testing on people is because it is not
Every year a variety of animals are put into experiments in laboratories. They are tested using new substances, ointments, nasal spray and many more products. It has been seen throughout our lives where we see pictures or articles that talk about how animals are tortured and abused in these laboratories. From all this, there have been many organizations that started a movement to ban animal testing. This new movement has received a lot of popularity from the people. It has made many companies that are against this find ways to show, print, and tell us that their product was safely tested on animals or not tested at all. They have tried to come up with new alternatives to stop animal testing or to simply hide the fact that they do. One major way they test on animals is using medical products. Also, products that benefit humans are tested on animals before they are sold to consumers. Although there has been much change in the way animals are put through experiments the question still lingers, Should animals experiment with products like medicine?
Charles Darwin, a renowned scientist, wrote to the Oxford zoologist Ray Lankester in 1871 : “You ask about my opinion on vivisection (animal testing). I quite agree…it is a subject that makes me sick with horror, so I will not say another word about it else I shall not sleep to-night, ” So you’d think, that nearly 150 years after Darwin’s words there would be some change in opinion. You’d think that when a scientist’s idol shows absolute disgust for animal testing they’d stop, especially as there are more effective and money-saving methods today. Experimenting on animals is cruel and morally wrong. Even as I speak, animals are being crammed into cages in the name of medical ‘research’. Animals are very different from humans, their anatomical structures are also different, so why test on animals when it the drugs they are being tested with are meant for HUMANS? What kind of sick logic is this?
It is estimated by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) that over one hundred million animals are killed each year by animal testing. The term “animal testing” refers to experimentation that takes place before human clinical trials to determine the dosing, toxicity, and efficiency of products for humans. This includes animals being tested for medical research, cosmetic products, and curiosity-driven experimentation. Many times this leads to animals being treated inhumanely and has led to serious controversy over whether animal testing is actually effective. In fact, animal testing is frowned upon because studies show that testing animals are not a direct analogy to impacting humans, animal testing also kills an unprecedented number of animals, and throughout the year’s scientists have found alternative methods for creating beneficial products for humans.