1.) You are a researcher interested in examining the concept of incivility. How would you operationalize this variable?
The conceptual definition of incivility includes “a rude or impolite attitude or behavior.” (Merriam-Webster)
The two dimensions of incivility included in this study will be physical incivility and oral incivility. Physical incivility will focus on observable body movements and gestures that would be considered impolite; this is an important dimension of incivility because the indicators of this dimension are easily and more readily observed even to the untrained eye. Oral incivility will focus on spoken words and behaviors that are impolite; this is an important dimension of incivility because it will focus on precise
…show more content…
The behaviors are clear and defined. The validity of the study can be defended as these acts accurately reflect the concept of impolite or rude behavior; again, these behaviors are agreed upon to be considered uncivil. incivility physical oral chewing food with mouth open reading someone’s personal communication over shoulder cutting off conversation partner incorrect/absence of addressing title
2.) Imagine you are interested in comparing how much time men and women spend on Facebook. you ask 5 men and 5 women to report how many minutes they have spent on Facebook in the last week in an open-ended question.
Calculations to this question are provided at the end of the document.
The mean and median for women are 96 and 30 minutes respectively; there is no mode. The mean, median, and mode for men are 54, 45, and 45 minutes respectively. From this data, I cannot come to any concrete conclusions about the amount of time men and women spend on Facebook as the data is unreliable with several outliers and a small sample size. However, if I were to use the median as my measure of central tendency (since it is a more appropriate measurement to use when the data has outliers and therefore resistant), I would deduce that
Use the text and your analysis to prepare two interpretive or evaluative discussion questions. Then identify the type of question you have created.
3.1 – Explain how people from different backgrounds may use and/or interpret communication methods in different ways.
The behaviours can be anywhere from verbal to physical to lewd. Lewd behavior is the unwelcome lewd gestures, demands for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical direct of a sexual sort that has a tendency to make an antagonistic or hostile workplace. Oppressive
Over the course of the last several decades, the polarization of American society’s use of positive and negative social etiquette in all interactions has reached its greatest level in recorded history. Never before have we been more aware of the greater events taking place in the world, yet ignorant and uncaring of the smaller more personal intricacies of our daily lives. At least, this is what freelance writer Todd Schwartz would lead us to believe in his thought provoking paper “American Jerk”. The majority of statements Schwartz’ makes in this article are accurate for the majority of American society, yet he draws several flawed parallels and fails to provide the necessary information to prove his greater accusations. This results in
5. Describe conceptualization and operationalization of the independent and dependent variables from your hypothesis, including examples of specific items that you would use to measure your
The purpose of this question was to encourage the group to think about how they feel when someone is rude or ignores them opposed to how they feel when someone gives them full attention and how attitudes can be ‘contagious’.
There is a mass of different ways to show rudeness to other people. One main thing that’s happening that shows rudeness is on the rise is children being disrespectful to their parents.
Japanese children are taught that such behaviour is impolite and are actively discouraged from displaying it. This means that the strange Situation does not have the same meaning for Japanese children as it does for American participants and is therefore, not a valid assessment of that culture, Takahashi proved this. The Strange Situation measurement assumes that
Suzanne Crampton and John W. Hodge. Rudeness and Incivility in the Workplace. Web http://www.na-businesspress.com/JLAE/crampton.pdf Fritscher-Porter (2003) stated that rudeness affects
There are some similarity in overall in terms of express their idea in an explicit or implicit way. However, people in my culture, regardless to their social class, avoid to use impolite words in their everyday language. Usually, the use of impolite words are limited to some extreme reactions which are normally are presented at behaviours, such as conflict and violence.
Judee Burgoon’s expectancy violations theory is about how people deal with violations of personal space, behaviors, and communication. Burgoon first started with Edward Hall’s theory about proxemics. Proxemics is someone’s personal space. She then modified her theory to include behavior and communication violations. The three main parts of Burgoon’s theory are expectancies, violation valence, and communicator reward valence. Expectancies are what some expects to happen. There are three factors that influence expectancy. The first is the context. Context can include cultural norms and the setting of the conversation. For some cultures, it is normal to stand right next to a person when you’re talking to them. In other cultures, that is a major violation. Also, the setting of the conversation affects the expectations. If you are talking with a professor in a classroom you expect there to be plenty of space. If you are on a dinner date you probably expect the other person to be close to you. The second factor of expectancy is relationship. Your relationship with the person you are talking to affects your expectations. If you are best friends being close together may not be a violation, but if you are strangers it may be seen as a big violation. The third factor is communicator characteristics. This includes a person’s age, sex, race, physical appearance, personality, and communication style. When people are warm, inviting, and physically attractive to us we
The Nature of Deference and Demeanor Goffman states in his article "The Nature of Deference and Demeanor" (1956) that human behavior in social interactions is determined by what he calls ‘Rules of Conduct’. If one wishes to use the rules as biblical I think they may be called the Ten Commandments; Exodus 20 which is also rules for spiritual means. All ‘Rules of Conduct’ serves as ‘a guide for action’. A rule of conduct may be an obligation or an expectation, and the two are intimately mated, for one man’s obligation is often the other’s expectation. Goffman developed the extensive theories of deference and demeanor in this essay, as two different terms that play integral roles and are interconnected.
Many of the latter are very minute details that an individual may act without realizing how rude they may seem. Which is why it is very important to research the customs of a different culture before interacting with each other.
First, my bad experience with manners was on the golf course. It was a very nice day out, and I was playing at Hannastown Golf Club in Greensburg, PA. While I was on the fifth hole a guy behind me almost hit me with a golf ball. I tried to procede without worrying about the ball hitting me. The gentleman came marching up to me using profanity that I have never heard before. He’s rude for
Mentioning these four aspects of limao it is essential to notice that polite behaviour can occur in both verbal and non-verbal forms. Talking about verbal behaviour of Chinese, being polite in content has to be distinguished by being polite in manner, since it is possible to criticise somebody (being impolite in content) in a gentle way (being polite in manner).