Throughout history we have seen many theories being implemented in the criminal justice system. People come in and try to set in something new that they think will improve the overall performance of the criminal justice system. To fully understand how theories work, it is critical to first be fully aware of what theories actually are. A theory is a set of interrelated variables formed into hypothesis, that specify a relationship among variables. Criminal justice is the main umbrella that all the other perspectives come under. “The theory of criminal justice involves four main philosophies that drive the policies that determine how a government handles its problems with crime. The first two, punishment theory and retributive theory focused on the satisfaction of the victim for such punishment. The other two primary theories of criminal justice, deterrent theory and reformation theory, are aimed at preventing future crimes. They seek to achieve this aim either by discouraging others to commit the same crimes or transforming the individual criminal into a productive member of society.” (Wikipedia. Theories of criminal law) That is the criminal justice theory in a nut shell, but when you look deeper you find other fascinating perspectives that have been implemented in the criminal justice system. One of these key perspectives is the social control perspective. Social control theory lets us understand and lower levels of criminal activity. The idea is that an individual’s basic
Developing information suggests that a criminal justice system gains practical value by generating societal views of fair enforcement and judgement. Particularly, views of practical fairness resulting in views of the system 's legality, may promote systemic compliance with applicable law, support with legal institutions and actors, and respect to even negative outcomes. A separate information alludes that a criminal justice system derives realistic value by allocating criminal legal responsibility and punishment according to principles that trail general instincts of justice. Distinctively, views of applicable justice resulting in views of the system 's ethical credibility would seem to promote compliance, support, and respect. By contrast, a criminal justice system alleged to be procedurally unfair or basically unjust may incite resistance and agitation, and may lose its capacity to control powerful social and normative influence.
A conspiracy theory is a theory that argues that the rich and those with power seek the make sure the criminal justice system fails because they benefit from that failure. Conspiracy theories are hard to be proven and for it to succeed, it has to be kept a secret. There’s no credibility in the sources due to the degree of secrecy. Conspiracy theories are invalid because it doesn’t correspond with how people behave most of the time. The Pyrrhic defeat theory isn’t a conspiracy theory because the theory bases itself on why the criminal justice system fails and that’s due to our own shortcoming of not trying hard enough to prevent it.
Across the world there are many different types of criminal justice systems to keep and maintain order and peace or the social code of conduct, otherwise known as the law of the land. The criminal justice system tries to deter individuals from disrupting the peace and order of society by educating their citizens on the consequences and punishments for failing to abide by the law. The criminal justice system can be categorized in three main parts; policing where the investigation is held, the courts where judgment is made, and corrections where the type of punishment is served.
Police departments are constantly trying to reduce crime with the help of technology. In 2010, researchers believed they had created an algorithm that could calculate future crimes. The Santa Cruise Police Department applied this algorithm hoping to locate possible delinquencies. This predicative policing algorithm deploys officers to the most targeted locations. The algorithm is a mixture of anthropological and criminological behavior research. It uses mathematics to estimate crime and predict future crimes locations within 500-square-feet. To determine criminal patterns, the system uses historical and current data to focus on gang violence, batteries, aggravated assaults, drug crimes, along with many more similar crimes. In order for the data to be secure, the employees transfer the data on selected crime types from the records management system to the secure Web-based program. After a period of six months, the police department indicated that the crime rate of burglaries and motor vehicle thefts had decreased. The Los Angeles Police Department tested the program and also noticed a decrease in crime. Though change is difficult, the Santa Cruise Police Department emphasized that the new system does not supersede officer intuition but enhances it. The program also does not replace officer’s education and expertise, but puts them in the right place to prevent
The criminal justice system is composed of three dominant component. Legislative, which is used to create laws, Adjudication, which deals with the courts and Corrections, which includes jails, prisons, parole and probation. For a criminal or defendant to be apprehended and be put into sections of the criminal justice system they first must be seized. The first contact of the criminal justice system and a defendant is usually with the police. Police are involved in law enforcement which investigates the suspects lawlessness and then concludes to make an arrest, which takes away that defendant's liberty. The second contact of the criminal justice system is the courts, which serves as a venue in which a criminal or civil case must be heard.
Our criminal justice system benefit’s our country by allowing residents to know that crime is taken seriously. Prisons work to discourage people from committing crimes, or at least to not get caught. It is accurate to seek punishment to prevent people from doing bad things. It is necessary that everyone can feel safe. Humans need consequences for their actions. In the interest of all people, this has been the original intention of our justice system. Although, as a result of this approach, it is understood that in the United States of America, we have the highest percentage of incarceration in the world. The fact is, there is no proof that this is helping society by ending or preventing crime. The protection society needs is dependent upon rehabilitation.
Criminal Profiler/Psychologist’s are people in the Criminal Justice System that create psychological profiles of criminals in order to identify behavioral patterns, in efforts to help officers narrow down their searches to people who fit that particular description. Profiler’s examine crime scenes, analyze evidence, read reports from investigators, write reports, and interview witnesses and victims in order to collect information. They may work for local, state, or federal law enforcement. Profilers are responsible for looking at a number of different factors when establishing a detailed profile on a criminal such as; the fashion in which crimes were committed, the location of the crime, the choices that the victim has made, the types and timing of crimes, communications from the suspect, and the condition of the crime scenes. In addition to those things profilers look at influences like race, age, residence and emotional and mental state in order to define a suspect’s certain characteristics.
Criminology is defined by the book Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, which was written by author Dr. Frank Schmalleger, Ph.D., as “the scientific study of the causes and prevention of crime and the rehabilitation and punishment of offenders” (Schmalleger, 2006, p. 20). People look at criminology in a big concept of criminal prevention but criminology in itself carries a wide variety of functions in treating crime and providing punishment to those who commit crimes. Crime increases when the population increases, which means the more populated and situated the place is the more crime effective the place maybe. Although crime is relevant towards the people
Based on the information presented, state and local governments spend the most money in the management of their criminal justice systems. As stated by Bohm & Haley, “… state and local governments share the costs of criminal justice by making police protection primarily a local function and corrections a state function” (2012). While billions are spent annually on the state and local levels for criminal justice, only “about 6.2% (2.7% for police protection, about 2.2% for corrections, and 1.3%for judicial and legal services)” (Bohm & Haley, 2012). This amounts to 70%-local, 11%-state, and 19%-federal for policing; 40%-local 38%-state, and 22%- federal for judicial and legal services; and 32%- local, 59%- state, and 9%-federal for corrections
South Africa’s criminal justice system has some of the same attributes as the United States criminal justice system. Once thing that make South Africa’s criminal justice system unique is they use a court system that is base off of Roman-Dutch law. Roman-Dutch law is a system that is produced from an early modern Dutch law that chiefly of Germanic origin and Roman civil law (Lee & Cowen, 2012).
One of the pivotal questions being deliberated amongst those within the criminal justice system, society and amongst biblical scholars is that of how do we deal with offenders, there have been copious debates and sentiments on the matter and one, in particular, has been around Restorative and Retributive Justice
The process of the Criminal Justice system works around flexibility and compassion to the individual attempting, far more than it used to, to refrain from formulating biased and impulsive judgment. All situations of the individual's case and background are taken into consideration and various programs exist to afford the individual the opportunity of reforming rather than being punished. Similarly, too, the more serious the crime, the greater the amount of facts are required in order to prove that the crime was actually committed. Preferring to exonerate rather than convict, justice and compassion are, nonetheless, combined with attention also placed on assuring the community maximum protection. Extreme punishment such as incarceration is also far less common than it was in eh past with various other programs and approaches used to supplement and replace the institutions of jail and prison
According to Cesare Beccaria, crimes occur when the potential pleasure and rewards from illegal acts outweigh the pains of punishment. Otherwise known as the classical school of criminology. The positivist school of criminology founded by Cesare Lombroso believed that criminals were born with traits and did not commit crimes on free will, as the classical school of criminology would suggest. Both schools of criminology impacted the criminal justice system that we live currently and that have occurred in the past. These two ways of thinking have very few, if any, similarities but their differences are more obvious.
In the criminal Justice system, the initial response to criminal behavior begins when a crime is reported and law enforcement responds or officers observe a crime and take appropriate action. Once the crime is identified, an investigation is conducted. If witnesses or victims are available and /or are willing to assist officers in the criminal investigation, their information is taken in hopes the information may lead the investigators to the arrest of the suspect(s).
Crime—an illegal act that may be prosecuted and is punishable by law. Crime is normal and will always be a part of the society. We desire to have money, power, and leisure. In order for a society to function and to ensure the safety of its own citizens, maintenance of common values is critical. However, people do not always abide by this collective moral sense due to different experiences, influences, and circumstances. The criminal justice system also have a huge impact of why crimes continue to exist or re-exists among criminals. Walters (2015) stated “we must be mindful of the subjective aspects of decision making when imposing sanctions on those who violates society’s laws. Many such offenders, in fact, view prison as a mean of cultivating