What Is The US Consumer Product Safety Commission?

Everyday you consume things may it be food, drinks, or prescription drugs. Most people will just absent mindedly intake these products subconsciously knowing that they are monitored by government organizations ensuring your safety. It has not always been that was and has progressed greatly throughout the years. although all consumer safety organizations may not be reputable, they do much more good than harm. Consumer safety is something that is extremely important to the American family, and has help thousands of people survive. Consumer safety is something that has allowed America to progress to where it is today.

Government agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), and the National Highway Transportation Safety Agency (NHTSA) handles setting the safety standards. According to Halbert & Ingulli (2012) parties can allocate risks with some constraints under the Uniform Commercial Code (p.282). For example, Toyotas was having acceleration problems with their vehicles. However, individuals “injured may now turn to the courts to hold manufacturers and sellers liable. In recent decades class action suits of injured Plaintiffs have been brought against entire industries found to have hidden the known risks of their products: asbestos, tobacco, and lead” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012, p.282).

The Australian Commission of Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) was established in 2006 by the Australian Government to improve safety and quality in healthcare. In 2011, the ACSQHC developed the ten National Safety and Quality Service Standards (NSQHS) in order to improve the safety and quality of the Australian healthcare system. The ten standards were also implemented to ensure that the public is protected from harm and that consumers or patients can expect a certain level of care from the healthcare systems. The standards are now compulsory for many healthcare organizations.

Actions are ethical - Government sets regulations to ensure that safety standards are being met and as long as the manufacturer is meeting those requirements, it must be safe and they must be acting ethically.

Legislation protects companies with high standards of responsibility from competitors who do not care for a safe working environment.

Greenman v. Yuba Power Products (1963) 59 C2d 57, and Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) are Important cases in product liability law, establishing strict

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is an independent regulatory agency responsible for protecting the public from unreasonable risks of injury and death associated with consumer products. The CPSC has jurisdiction over approximately 15,000 different types of products used in

demeanors research on potentially hazardous products. The CPSC promotes the development of voluntary safety standards and under certain circumstances has the authority to issue and enforce standards and ban unsafe products. Out of all the activities the CPSC strives to work closely with private consumer groups, industry, the media, and agencies of various state and local governments. Although the CPSC is an independent federal regulatory agency it does not have authority over all consumer products. Safety standards for trucks, automobiles, and motorcycles are set by the U.S. Department of Transportation; standards for drugs and cosmetics are handled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); and standards for alcohol, tobacco, and firearms

As of the date of this report, Takata is one of the largest recalls of any consumer product in U.S. history. Takata is an automotive parts company based in Japan. It has production facilities on the United States. More than 20 million vehicles are subject to recall in other countries. These events prompted Takata company to commission the independent Takata

This will be a discussion on the relationship with consumers and the products they buy from corporations. What, if any are the corporations responsibility to the consumer in regards of warranties and safety. The case discussed will be Hot Coffee (Brusseau, 2012). This case began between a seventy-nine year old women and the McDonalds corporation. The women burned herself with hot coffee sold by McDonalds and she sued.

Engineers are trusted individuals which the public has set high standards for. The public relies on engineers to efficiently, and accurately determine the safety of all products they create. Engineers are required to follow safety procedures in order to ensure the quality of the products they create. However, are these procedures enough to ensure the safety of the public? Or can additional actions be taken in order to improve the safety of a product? If so, to what extent should engineers be required to take matters into their own hands and ensure the safety of products, in return reducing the number of injuries and fatal accidents?

It can be said that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission already regulates turpentine well enough. In 1927, President Calvin Coolidge required “mandated warnings be

Product guarantee insurance comes into force when an insured has a defective product. This type of policy picks up the exposure not covered by a products liability policy, such as cover for any costs involved in the removal, repair or replacement of faulty/defective products or any consequential loss the customer experiences as a result of using the faulty/defective product. This policy may also pick up financial loss suffered third parties as a direct result of the failure of the product.

Health and Safety Regulations aim to improve safety in workplaces, making employers and employees equally responsible for ensuring that they protect themselves and others from accident and injury. The regulations refer to such things as clean kitchens, safety guards on machinery etc., If an employee is injured at work because of breaches of these rules then compensation can be awarded. Most health and safety legislation places place the responsibility of health and safety on the employers. The responsibilities may however be delegated to other competent persons such as fire warders, first aiders and care takers but the employer still

Case Study #1: Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program (King and Lenox, 2000)