preview

Urine Ph Rate Lab Report

Satisfactory Essays

RESULTS
Effect of the interventions on urine volume and pH

The chronic administration of 0.75% (v/v) EG aqueous solution to the rats caused a significant increase in the urine volume (p < 0.001). On the day 30, urine output was 4.75 ± 0.35 ml/day in the control group, and 9 ± 1.21 ml/day in the EG group. HAEP increased further urine output when compared to the EG group during weeks 2nd, 3th and 4th week intervals and to the cystone group during 3th and 4th week intervals (Figure 1).

The effect of HAEP on the urine pH level is presented in Figure 2. The urine pH level in EG group was higher than the control group. On the other hand, cystone and HAEP did not cause significant changes in the urine pH as compared to the control group when they were used along with EG.

Effects of the interventions on the urinary excretion of calcium, phosphate and magnesium …show more content…

However, HAEP increased urinary excretion of creatinine at both doses as compared to the EG group and the control. Higher dose of HAEP showed higher effect than cystone (Figure 4). EG increased significantly urinary excretion of uric acid while HAPE and cystone decreased it. Regarding urinary protein excretion, EG increased urine protein excretion while cystone and HAPE decreased urinary protein excretion. The higher dose of HAEP has the higher effect on urinary protein and it was more effective than cystone.

Effects of the interventions on the urinary electrolytes and creatinine clearance

The effects of the interventions on urinary excretion of sodium, chloride and potassium are summarized in Figure 5. EG significantly decreased urinary excretion of potassium, sodium and chloride. Cystone and HAPE counteracted the effect of EG and elevated the excretion of potassium, sodium and chloride as compared to the EG group. Furthermore, EG

Get Access