Value Compass Healthcare advancements will only transpire when the measurement of outcomes is linked to processes and systems supporting the results. Creating a way to measure quality-related outcomes and costs is essential to successful healthcare management. The value compass is a way to focus the direction of an organization using four main points: clinical outcomes, satisfaction, quality, and costs. The value compass provides clarify for the performance improvement efforts and helps members of the healthcare team reach the department’s goals. The value compass that I have submitted is focused on the Pediatric Critical Care environment. Medical/Clinical Outcomes Pediatric ICU patients are uniquely …show more content…
Quality Care Outcomes Increasing the quality of healthcare is a great way to reduce costs and improve outcomes. When a healthcare organization focuses and monitors patient outcomes they are able to see the results of implemented system-wide programs and protocols. The outcome data from the introduction of the asthma care process model could result in prevention of many acute asthma exacerbations and provide the patient with a greater quality of life by overall symptom reduction. The septic shock guidelines have the potential to improve morbidly and mortality outcomes for pediatric patients. Initiating a falls risk protocol will help to improve outcomes and increase patient safety. Decreasing the nosocomial rate by increasing hand hygiene compliance increases the quality of care that is provided by the healthcare team. Decreasing the ICU rates of VAP increases positive outcomes by reducing harm caused to patients by increased ventilator days and longer hospitalization. Satisfaction In the pediatric population, patient satisfaction is largely determined by parental satisfaction. We spend a large portion of our time making sure that the parents are updated, informed, and satisfied with the care that is being provided to their child. Increasing patient wellness has a positive affect on patient satisfaction. Although satisfaction
Even though Texas Health Resources approach is uninterrupted throughout this study with the sole purpose of endorsing of quality assurance and maneuvering to brand core measurements attained. The key to the leaders involved in this organization study is to convey, examine, make improvements, collaborate, and initiate changes within the hospital, which this study principally is engrossed on bringing crucial argument and descriptions to light. Precisely monitoring the study there were several references concerning how Texas Health Harris Methodist- Cleborne recuperated their performance and quality assurance by the 15th percentile from Texas Health Resources its parent organization. This organization 's theory used would be a resources dependence theory. Authority was assumed to this same organization Texas Health Resources with anticipation to produce and improve a new core resource model for clinical outcomes and this theory would be an independent variable theory. Numerous quality encouragements were set up for employees to promote their performances which demonstrates the hierarchy of needs theory. For the reason that, this demonstrates that the Texas Health Resources constructs all the results regarding what transpires and gives Texas Health Harris Methodist -Cleborne the approval to acquire a new position of clinical outcomes specialists, that what focus on the daily functions within their organization. Established on their discoveries, reports showed that part of her
Outcome based processes geared towards improving outcomes by implementing performance improvement checks on all complaints or negative feedback acquired from patients, healthcare providers, employees, vendors (all stakeholders) and environment of care rounds. These would include QC measures, infectious control measures, ACC measures, HCAP measures to name a few. Align with nationally recognized locators for healthcare facilities to compare our organization with local and nationally recognized healthcare organizations to see where we rank. Strategic goals established by The Joint Commission and initiatives by CMS will help improve overall performance.
This assignment is a case study of a patient who was admitted to a respiratory ward with acute exacerbation of asthma. This assignment will discuss nursing an adult patient with asthma, also it will aim to critically assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patients nursing needs using the Roper, Logan and Tierney nursing model (1980). This case study will focus on the maintaining a safe environment. It is worth noting that the activities of daily living are interlinked e.g. according to Roper et al (1980) breathing is an activity that is crucial for life therefore all other activities are dependent on us being able to breathe. The nursing management, pharmacological agents and the tools used will be critically
Quality management is essential to the success of the quality improvement of the health care industry. “Management uses management and planning tools to organize the decision making process and create a hierarchy when faced with competing priorities “( Ransom, et al., 2008). Quality measures should have these goals: effective, safe, efficient, patient-centered, equitable, and timely care (Quality Measures, Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2011).
My experience in both my previous career in nursing and human resources has dealt with approaches in quality improvement in patient safety and different metrics in the turning up organizational behavior as well as up swinging the operations of the organizations respectively. We live in a rapidly changing world, and healthcare industry is not exempted from it. Because I will be playing an indispensable role in the future, I am very interested on the concept of quality improvement and what not and identify possible future challenges and draw lessons from healthcare organizations that has spearhead innovative changes to providing healthcare by pursuing the triple dimensions of the improvement of healthcare in general that is Improving the patient experience of care (including quality and satisfaction); Enriching the health of populations; and Reducing the per capita cost of health care.
In an ever increasingly competitive healthcare environment, there is a need to determine that 1) the desired outcome is produced, 2) quality care is provided and 3) the cost of care is the lowest possible. Yet the basis for the determination of such is having the right kind of measures available. Dr. Trudy Mallinson is one such specialist in the program who has the year of experience
-Engaged in patient-centered care beyond the bedside and discovered the impact of environmental and social factors on a child’s well-being
In any continuous quality improvement effort, measurement is the key element (Sollecito, & Johnson, 2013). “Measurement and statistical analysis are used to assess the impact of an improvement effort” (Sollecito & Johnson, 2013). To Measure the impact of the program, the hospital utilized a departmental quality improvement assessment with a scoring matrix for self-assessment (McLaughlin, et. al., 2012). The scoring matrix consisted of five category ratings which each department head had to complete. Univer4sal Charting and Resource Utilization were also used for measurement (McLaughlin, et. al., 2012).
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) introduced five core competencies for healthcare professionals, to improve the United States healthcare system: provide patient-centered care, work in interdisciplinary teams, employ evidence-based practice, apply quality improvement, and utilize informatics (Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, 2003). IOM insists that should all five competencies are met, quality patient care can be achieved. Thus, healthcare organizations need to continually seek quality improvement in order to enhance patient care. The organization need to revamp their current charting system, in order to improve patient care.
The Johns Hopkins Hospital, located in Baltimore, MD, is one of the greatest institutions in modern medicine. Established in 1889 from the donation of philanthropist Johns Hopkins, the hospital and university serve millions of patients annually for emergency, inpatient, and outpatient visits. Patient care is the focus of Johns Hopkins vision. The hospital uses quality care and innovation to enhance patient care. It is the hospital’s goal to have great precision, safety, comfort, coordination, and improved workflow to achieve an outstanding customer experience. An added feature to the customer experience are the design elements that can be found flowing throughout their newest facilities which helps foster healing and stress free environments. From the dramatic art collections that fill the walls and windows of patients rooms, to its 20-year reign as U.S. News and World Report’s “Best Hospital”, Johns Hopkins has made its mark on society. At some point, however, every great dynasty loses its ranks. Unfortunately, Johns Hopkins is no different. With the creation of a federally-mandated patient satisfaction survey for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, the stakes for high ratings is of fiscal importance. In an effort to increase its patient satisfaction ratings, the hospital created performance measurements to highlight strengths and areas of improvement with patient outcomes. The implementation of this new initiative, the Patient Toolbox, considers the fundamental reasons
Quality measures are strategies that gauge, evaluate or compute health care processes, results, discernments, patient insight, and administrative structure. In addition, quality measures are frameworks that are connected with the capacity to deliver first-class health care and/or that are able to identify with one or more quality objectives for medicinal services. These objectives include: compelling, protected, effective, quiet focused, impartial, and opportune consideration. Quality measures can be used to measure quality improvement, public reporting, and pay-for-reporting programs specific for health care providers (CMS.gov, 2016). There are an assortment of quality measures in which health care organizations can use to determine the status of the care they are delivering. Many are appropriate, but few are chosen for this research paper. Among them are: National Health Care Surveys, Hospital IQR Programs, Scorecards, and Political, Power, and Perception/Data for Decision-making tools.
The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program is a current model using certain criteria for purposes of improving quality and risk management. Health care organizations and risk managers around the country utilize this model to boost safety processes and outcomes. At the other end, a final goal is sought to reduce cost and get positive results for the organization. Criteria within the Baldrige model focuses on the successful operation of health care organizations that corroborate between units and departments, including leadership and performance, while also considering Joint Commission accreditation, Magnet status, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement initiatives (The National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2014). The goal of the Baldrige model is to lead all components of the organization to be unified and productive as a whole, manage change, and examine and analyze data in order to be competitive and successful in the healthcare market.
Examining planning for and effectively measuring the health care quality indicators make healthcare quality more transparent and provide information for quality improvement programs and initiatives in the healthcare system.
Paradise Hospital, Inc. is a for-profit hospital. As the facility’s new hospital administrator, you have been tasked with improving the service value of the hospital. The administration has not done this process since the hospital began operating in the year 1995. The investors are not familiar with the value proposition strategies of hospitals in the current day America.
Quality is something that every health care agency strives to achieve. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) suggests that health care organizations develop a culture of safety such that an organization's care processes and workforce are focused on improving the reliability and safety of care for patients (Groves, Meisenbach, & Scott-Cawiezell, 2011). In order to address an issue related to health care quality, it is important to look at the frameworks that will analyze an organization and identify opportunities to improve performance. The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of an organization and an analysis of the following: mission, vision and values, strategic plan, goals,