Webuwrite Academy Conflict “One of the tenets of this book is that all conflicts are about two issues: power and self-esteem.”(Hocker,J.L. & Wilmot, W.W., 2014). Thought, interpersonal relationships, and knowledge form our mental image of how we view or regard ourselves, consequently how view ourselves determines our conflict engagement method. Personal power, as it relates to the authority, control and the influence we exert in an organization, is also a predictor of our conflict engagement method. From our text, we can carefully conclude that our self view and perceived organizational influence contribute to our participation in conflict.
Attributes of organizational conflict are poor communication, misaligned values, conflicting
…show more content…
The second conflict is between Brad Hayes and Jill Kaplan-Zuckerman. The third conflict is between Meera Agarwal and Alvin Lim. The fourth conflict is between Meera Agarwal and her feelings about Angela Camper. The fifth conflict is between Tyler Sanchez and Melanie Michaels, and in a larger context, his feelings of powerlessness.
Brad Hayes, VP of Marketing and Jill Kaplan-Zuckerman, VP of Course Development
Brad is verbally aggressive and makes very little effort to be polite, or respectful. He has a superior view of his position and the power he welds. Brad insulted every department with the exception of Jill’s; by implying it was not necessary to possess good writing skills to perform the other functions in the company. In the private confessional, Brad revealed that he was comfortable being disliked, stating that he is purposefully blunt. He conflict style is destructively dominating and does not invite collaboration, but rather a winner take all approach that is polarizing. Jill is a good friend of the CEO, and may be employing the technique of appearing accommodating or obliging, to retain status through this link. She understands that she plays an integral role in the company, because she essentially is responsible for creating the company’s only product, creating well-designed instructional course that meet the prospective clients need. Her passive-aggressive approach, or avoidance of having a direct confrontation with Brad fuels their
In Cloke and Goldsmith’s Resolving Conflicts at Work, strategy 1 gives us an overview of conflict today and the many factors that influence. The authors also explain the many ways nearly every conflict can be handled. Cloke tells us that differing human perceptions keep us stuck in conflict longer than is necessary and productive. Early family development sets the default settings for each person’s perception of the situations they will face for the rest of their lives. Cloke goes on to say that conflict is unavoidable especially because today’s media continually subjects Americans to conflict following a common injunction, “if it bleeds it leads.”
In today’s organizations conflict and power are important elements to the success of any company but can also create negative long term impacts if not addressed. Organizations require enough power within the leaders to get through conflict and enough conflict within individuals to create new innovations. Not all conflict is bad but when there is conflict individuals with power must assist in aligning conflict resolution to assist in understanding for everyone involved in the conflict. The need for successful conflict resolution is vital for employees so that they are capable of moving on and understanding why the conflict was overcome.
Organizational development practitioner Rick Buccheri discussed his experiences of conflict management in several organizations. Primarily, his discourse was about the United Parcel Service and the Transportation Security Administration. He outlined his working theory that institutions should encourage “conflict engagement.” This is where individuals, groups, and systems would identify underlying conflicts that have yet to be expressed. Bucherri says good conflict engagement for at any level is as follows:
Conflict is part of our human disposition; consequently, it is customary within organizations. “Left unanalyzed and unchecked, it can be a destructive force that consumes time, money and human resources. Learning the various ways that people resolve conflict and expanding their conflict resolution styles can lead to better results” (Sadri, 2012). Within organizations employees have personal beliefs, styles and attitudes, and backgrounds that at times can cause disagreements, inconsistencies and ultimately, conflict. It is the intent of this paper to examine the archetype of conflict as an
Wilmot and Hocker defines conflict as being, “an expressive struggle between at least two interdependent people with incompatible goals, scarce resources and interference from achieving a specific goal”. ( ) Conflicts are inevitable, these conflicts can arise in intimate relationships, between parents and children, between siblings, in friendships and in the work place. While conflicts will never cease to exist, they can evolve into very complex creatures, and as "most of us are notoriously inaccurate at describing our own behavior in a conflict"(p. 129). There has become a great need for an assessment model to begin to thoroughly understand all of the elements that play into complexities of conflict. The Hocker-Wilmot Conflict Assessment Guide is so important because it aides us in describing the nature of conflict, this include; its history, precipitating events, the parties ' assumptions about conflict in general, the conflict elements, and past or potential transformations of those elements. Additionally, conflict styles are addressed, as is the perceptions of the opposing view, and the style of the system as a whole. The guide assesses the role of power in the conflict, describing the parties ' attitudes toward power, their areas of dependency and sources of power, their view of the balance of power, any unrecognized sources of power, and whether destructive forms of power balancing are occurring. The assessment should describe the parties ' goals, their
To begin this assignment I began to explore Theme 2 of the Jones International University database and an EHow website to get a better understanding of the style of conflict experienced between the Lockheed Martin Corporation and the Pentagon. I began to get a better understanding of the conflict styles by reading Theme 2; coincidentally I looked for the specific one that I thought fit the conflict style read in the article from the Washington Post—it just so happened to be 5 categories of conflict styles present. Next, I focused my attention toward the article
Some of the conflicts that are occurring frequently in this organization are lack of proper communication and coordination. Conflict can occur in many areas such as there could be a conflict within an organization, personal conflict involving the personal identity, moral context, Intrapersonal conflict, goal conflict, value conflict, relational conflict and community conflict. When considering conflict within an organization there are many factors that attribute to such conflicts. There can be many reasons for a conflict to arise in an organization. For example if an organization hires a new resource at a higher position and
While conflict can be a healthy part of an organization, conflict managed poorly has significant impact on an organization. What further exacerbates this issue is when there is an imbalance of power. This paper examines the relationship of conflict and power. It will address how imbalance of power can impede one’s efforts in managing conflict in the workplace. It will also identify ideas on how to integrate ways to mediate conflict into the culture. Lastly, the paper will use a case study to illustrate these concepts.
little to no power. The different individual perceptions of power within a conflict can affect communication.
Power is present in many social interactions, and it allows people to have influence over others (Papa, Daniels, & Spiker, 2008). Conflicts arise when a person feels he or she has more power than the other person so they start discriminating, harassing, and alienating the disadvantaged person. Power perspective emphasizes on the ability to compel someone to do something thus suggests power to be coercive and competitive (Papa, et al., 2008). In addition, the power theory views the conflicts as a win-lose competition thus limiting the chances of a satisfactory resolution (Deutsch, & Coleman, 2011). Several perspectives on power help in understanding and adoption a conflict resolution strategy (Papa, et al., 2008). In the
In this reflection for management 3000 with Marcus A. Valenzuela’s class, I have attempted conflicts that are being few things that happen usually between individuals and organizations. However, there are different ways to handle conflicts which a few are more effective than others. Before I justify the two different ways, it is crucial to grasp what conflict is. Conflict is whenever disagreements exist in a very scenario over problems with substance or emotional antagonisms produce frictions people or group. There are two distinctive forms of conflict, substantive conflict and emotional conflict. I learned in detail of the organization on understanding of human behavior in business organizations. I have been shown the importance of some
Jones (2013) states that organizational conflict is the clash that occurs when the goal-directed behavior of one group blocks or thwarts the goals of another (p. 391). In the case study Politics at Walt Disney the CEO Eisner began losing favor with the company when the firm’s performance began to fall. Despite having handpicked a majority of the board members Eisner could not deny the company’s loss of performance. Pondy (as cited by Jones, 2013) developed a model of organizational conflict which lists five sources of conflict in stages. In stage one latent conflict is described as not having any direct obvious conflicts; however disparities and divisional differences are apparent. Stage two perceived conflict occurs when another division believes their goals are being restrained by another section. Stage three felt conflict each section begin harboring direct resentment against each other. Stage four manifest conflict happen when each section exhibits some form of retaliation against the other department. Finally, stage five conflict aftermath happens when the conflict has been resolved, but more often than not the conflict arises again.
Conflict is inescapable, having the ability to recognize, understand, and resolve conflicts are important in both personal and professional lives. Myatt (2012) states that conflict in the workplace is unavoidable; if left unresolved, workplace conflict may result in loss of productivity and the creation of barriers that can inhibit creativity, cooperation, and collaboration. It is vital to embrace conflict and address problems through effective conflict-resolution tactics because if not handled appropriately, conflict will escalate. “If not handled properly, conflict may significantly affect employee morale, increase turnover, and even result in litigation, ultimately affecting the overall well-being of
For many of us, every day is a struggle to avoid conflict. Yet avoidance is practically impossible since the core characteristics, ideas and beliefs of each individual often conflict with our own. Differences of opinion, competitive zeal, and misinterpretations, among other factors, can all generate ill feelings between co-workers within an organization. While we can’t avoid conflict, we can learn how to sidestep negative confrontations by becoming familiar with the types of conflicts that most commonly arise in the work place and by learning how to resolve them.
The traditional view of conflict is that conflict is intrinsically negative, produces negative consequences, and has a detrimental effect on organizations. Like the other two viewpoints, the tradition al view realizes that conflict is essentially inevitable. However, this viewpoint strives to minimize if not outright avoid conflict because it deems it to produce noxious consequences. This outright avoidance of conflict is not necessarily adhered to in the human relations view of conflict. This viewpoint posits the notion that conflict is and of itself natural, or organic in nature. Whereas the traditional viewpoint of conflict is that it is always bad, the human relations viewpoint sees conflict as a natural