What stops Managers from implementing Coaching?
Coaching literature has proved that indeed coaching is a complex task, that’s why managers may not want to or be willing to practice coaching in their leadership style.
Below are some of the reasons that would show why a manager wouldn’t want to apply coaching in his management.
1. Some traditional skills and qualities that exist in some managers don’t fit with the profile of the coaching manager such as being highly competitive, who faces a problem in listening to others, likes to be in control, finds pleasure in solving problems by himself. The manager may need to go beyond the call of duty, which may require personal change from the manager’s side and in some cases adopting a totally different management style that may be against the manager’s nature (Phillips, 1994); (McComb, 2012).
2. Some managers may see coaching as too time-consuming thus they regard it as less-priority due to their other commitments and responsibilities (McComb, 2012); (Peterson & Little, 2005); (McLean, Yang, Kuo, Tolbert, & Larkin, 2005).
3. Some managers may think that they need to know everything about a certain topic in order to coach their subordinates about this issue and like to be looked at as an expert thus refrain from doing so in order not to show their ignorance of the topic. However, the coach’s role is more of an enabler than someone who has all the answers and knowledge. A manager can still coach his employee and help him to develop
Sports management is a really broad field, therefore I decided to focus on my minor and one of my major interests of this field: coaching. In this paper I will be explaining my personal five building blocks that make up a well-rounded coaching philosophy and coach. Those blocks are; leadership, organization, attitude, respect, and resiliency. Each of these five aspects are equally important and balance each other out. Leadership, the action of leading a group of athletes towards a goal. Organization, being able to organize a team and have a plan in order to help the team achieve goals. Attitude, it is very important for a coach to have a winning and positive attitude that is contagious to the players. Respect, there has to be a good
It is important that early on in the coaching relationship ownership of the problem or opportunity passes to the employee. For this reason language such as, "here is what I would like you to do," should be replaced by, "how would you like to address this?" Assumptions of deeply committed self-management from an employee with low self-esteem, however, are akin to building a house on quicksand.
Coaches need to have certain skills and knowledge to undertake the role. In my opinion a coach needs to be patient, supportive, interested, aware of others as well as self, attentive and perceptive. Such elements underpin effective coaching and a genuine interest in the person being coached.
Coaching leaders help employees by identifying their unique strengths and weaknesses. They encourage employees to establish long-term goals. Coaching style is used least often because many leaders don’t have time to teach people and help them grow. Studies have shown that leaders who have mastered four our more especially the authoritative, democratic, affiliative and coaching styles have the best climate and business performance. I believe in order to master the art of leadership we need to comprehensively understand human behavior and have the ability to adapt. Leadership styles can lead to different types of success, as mentioned in the article leadership will never be an exact science. But neither is it a complete mystery. I believe that the business environment is continually changing, all leaders have to respond. Leaders must know when to use the right style at the right time to gain success. Although not all skills are equally effective leaders could use multiple styles at one time to gain success. For example leaders could use the authoritative style to mobilize people towards a vision while at the same time creating bonds and harmony through the affiliative
When I think of coaching I think of practice planning, game planning, scouting strategizing of offense and defense, choosing my starters, little things like that. All of those ideas are valid, but that’s not the whole picture. There is a lot more to coaching than planning for a practice or a game. Many times a person who would like to coach an interschool athletic team has little or no preparation to teach sports skills and techniques. The only qualifications is often the person’s participation on his or her high school, college, or university’s team, coach of a community youth team or even perhaps as a professional player. While all that experience is valuable in one way or another, it does not constitute an adequate preparation for
Bluckert, P. (2005). Critical factors in executive coaching- the coaching relationship. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(7), 336-340. doi:10.1108/00197850510626785
Coaching is a useful way to develop people’s skills and abilities, and of boosting performance. It can also help deal with issues and challenges before they become major problems. Coaching typically begins with a personal interview with the employee to assess the situation, review current opportunities and challenges. After the interview, priorities for action are established along with specific desired outcomes. Individuals may also be asked to complete specific action items in a certain period of time that support the achievement of desired goals. Resources may also be provided such as articles, checklists and assessments.
Leadership and coaching go hand in hand in many ways because to coach is to lead, and to lead is to coach others. Indeed, leaders and coaches, whatever the title are really mentors within the context of a particular organization or activity. For centuries, scholars and philosophers alike have been trying to find a specific and complete definition for coaching and leadership, but have not had much success. True, leadership is, in part, decision making at the nth level; while coaching takes that decision making and often compartmentalizes it into split-second action (Rhodes, J., et al. 2000). In the era of gloablization, this has become even more critical now that there are so many divergent cultural opportunities that require new skills, approaches, and even that allow coaching to occur not just in the physical environment, but in the virtual as well, with no regard for geographic or political boundaries (Drucker, P.F., et al. 2001).
In the content of this paper you will see that there is every organization expects their employees to maintain a level of professionalism in their behavior and conduct. All employees are expected to obey policies and procedures and to have self-discipline. When employees stray from the expectations of an organization there are consequences to every action, both good and bad. At the end of this paper the reader will know and understand the concept of coaching employees.
There are fundamental personal qualities, coaching competencies and skills that are needed to become a good coach.
I think some people naturally want to talk more than listen and impose their ideals onto others. That is not a coach’s role. Whitmore says, “It may be harder to give up instructing than it is to learn to coach.”(Whitmore, 2009, p. 11) I whole heartedly agree with that statement. Whitmore also says, “Coaching is unlocking peoples potential to maximize their own performance. It is helping them to learn rather than teaching them. After all, how did you learns to walk? Did you mother instruct you? We all have a built-in, natural learning capability that is actually disrupted by instruction.”(Whitmore, 2009, p. 10) I kept the analogy of a mother and her child learning to walk in the forefront of my mind during each meeting we had. I know myself and the struggles I have with performance issues with my own staff and how I too had to work on my own
Coaching is the art of facilitating another person’s learning, development and performance. Through coaching people are able to find their own solutions, develop their own skills and change their own behaviors and attitudes.
In a business there are several different factors, and attributes that can excel or hinder a company’s environmental and economic success. Most people believe that a business’s longevity relies solely on its profits and regulations, when in actuality, it is the coaching and the leadership of the business. In fact, coaching and leadership are the greatest attributes that accumulate to a company’s success, but if they are abused, or misused, they can cause severe damage to the company’s well-being. For this paper I will be covering the topics of coaching and leadership in the workplace and will be giving different types of styles for both concepts. I will also evaluate the correlation between the two and will give several examples throughout to help comprehend the topics. I will then explain how these attributes can be abused and can cause more harm to a company than good. I will conclude my paper by highlighting all of the main points throughout the paper, and then give my own opinion on the subject.
It is during this stage that the coaching skills of the coaching manager should come to the fore. Both individuals and the team as a whole should be coached to enable and support them to ensure agreement as regards what specifically the goals, roles, and rules are with respect to the team and what that means to each and every individual (Mackintosh, 2003).
As it is well known throughout the world, executive coaching concept appears to be geared towards utilizing external coaches to help executive clients, while the focus of managerial coaching is to utilize managers within a given organization to engage and built relationship between managers and employees and employee to employee. Even if orientation is disregarded, coaching foundations are rooted in western world, primarily the US, and it emphasizes managerial values of accountability, participation, free choice among others. To some extent, the managerial values in western world have democratic tendencies. However, this may not be same in Saudi Arabia, that is ruled by a monarch and whose business culture is rooted in Islamic religion.