Ciulla, J. B. (2014) The Bogus Empowerment of Followers. In Ethics, The Heart of Leadership, J.B. Ciulla (Editor), pg. 82-103.
In this chapter, "niceness" was identified as an encompassing value in empowerment that is based on therapeutic fiction for the means of commercialism. Having always thought of "niceness" as a very kind and desirable trait, I was disturbed by the book's cynical interpretation of this quality. Their view makes the assumption that human are selfish individuals who act only when it is in their best interests. I find it disheartening to think that people's niceness is just a shallow performance for hidden ulterior motives, but at the same time, I do recognize the reasoning behind it. It is natural for individuals to be conscious of what is at
…show more content…
I thought that the experiments conducted were very crucial to examining the validity behind that statement. The idea that a leader, with a substantial amount of power, has the ability to carry through with acts of hypocrisy is unsettling. Through the 5 experiments, the researchers were able to support their hypothesis that power increases hypocrisy because people of power can simultaneously stricken their judgement of other people while reducing their own liability to the same expectations/standards. I believe this is a flawed form of leadership where leaders are too focused on their superficial positions of power, as opposed to their duties as competent and ethical leaders. At the end, the report mentioned how people can invalidate the power of authority figures by tainting their reputation. I believe this highlights the important source of leaders' power, which comes from the people they represent or direct. A tainted reputation can undermine the relationship of trust between a leader and his followers, which can ultimately strip him/her of the authority that the people has temporarily given
Often times, many forget to be kind to one another. When we are performing out our daily activities we forget to think about other people. Individuals can be naturally selfish or self- centered. There are multiple obstacles working against our being kind to one another. Our own success being one of them. We must remember to put ourselves in the shoes of the other person, in order to understand the issues in front of us. It is not easy to become detached ourselves from how we usually are nor how we are born, but it is imperative that we try to ensure a brighter future.
In the paradigm of management, empowerment is viewed as losing authority and control over people and resources. Generally, people resent being driven, controlled and being seen as part of company equipment. This breeds apathy in employees towards the organisation’s intents in the market place and destroys accountability.
The purpose of this essay is to question the readers. Ascher wants the audience to analyze themselves to determine the reason behind why people show kindness, whether it is out of fear, pity, or compassion.
Barker, R. A. (1997). How can we train leaders if we do not know what leadership is? Human Relations, 50(4), 343-362. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/231429531?accountid=458
The essays that comprise Traditional Classics on Leadership present varying notions of authority and of challenging authority. This is largely due to the fact that this manuscript is comprised of essays from 31 contributors, ranging from well-known political theorists to some of the more salient voices for individuality that the world has known. Still, there are some points of commonalities in these essays that present a synthesized viewpoint of the concept of challenging authority.
Humanity continues to puzzle those that observe it, as it continually shifts and changes. Few aspects remain constant in a race of nonstop deviation, but the fact that amiable individuals typically lead less successful lives compared to those that are self-centered stays true consistently. Kindness is a trait of unsuccessful people because the kind people get taken advantage of, having morals is a drawback, and success follows the insensitive.
Leadership might be the most discussed and written about topics in our modern society. Thousands of books have covered this topic and people are often using this term correctly as well as in the right format. But what does it really mean? Strength? Power? Leadership could be as simple as holding the hand of a small child crossing the street, or as complex as signing the Declaration of Independence. A leader is not someone who cheats their way to the top, or tricks others into doing things. Being a leader is also not all about power and control. Power is not leadership because leaders don’t necessarily need any source of “power,” but instead are looked up to by their followers. The assertion of power can create feelings of fear, betrayal,
3. Wilson, Robert. (December 31, 2009). Leadership vs. Power. Psychologytoday.com. September 30, 2012. Retrieved From http
Niceness is something that makes you feel good about yourself, being nice and kind is really good for you as an individual, in fact it 's a very profitable business because it gives you that warm soft feeling all over, of course these positive feelings carry over into all areas of your life causing a general improvement in well-being, what a bonus i would call that!
Motivation and empowerment. In R. L. Daft, Leadership (pp. Chapter 8 pages 200 - 220).
1. This chapter suggests that leadership has a moral dimension and that leaders have a responsibility to use their authority for the common good. Do you agree? Discuss
The importance placed on the follower’s opinions and capabilities acknowledges the value of his or her contribution by leadership. It motivates people to do their best and achieve the necessary goal(s). This empowerment by leadership therefore promotes a beneficial message between leaders and followers allowing for future communication when difficult circumstances might arise.
The unseen force that propels “Credibility” is a blend of ethical, transformational, and servant leadership theories . The book’s introductory pages initiate this idea with
A new moral principle is emerging which holds that the only authority deserving one’s allegiance is that which is freely and knowingly granted by the led to the leader in response to, and in proportion to, the clearly evident servant stature of the leader. (p. 20)
The concept of power is an applicable leadership concept. Leaders use power to decipher whether they have the ability to acquire the commitment or obedience from their workers/officers. Leaders that are educated or trained under the old-paradigm, have low levels of expectations of others around them, and tend to use