Animal Testing Cancer Animal testing, is it ethical? Does it hurt the animals? Do they die from it? These are all questions you may ask about animal testing. All those questions could go different ways. Some people may think it is ethical, and some may think it is unethical. Does it hurt them, is another one where it could go both ways. Sometimes it depends on the kind of test they do on them it may even kill them. But sometimes it could also be harmless, like when they test the effects of cosmetics on their skin. What I will be focusing on is the effect of animal testing for cancer research. Some people may say it is a terrible thing because the animals usually die from it. But I personally think that it is a great thing because …show more content…
Most of the time the animals father leaves and they never seethe father. But it really depends on the type of animal and if we would test on those kinds of animals I think maybe we can turn some people’s opinions around. Some of the most frequently used animals are rats and mice. They both reproduce like mad. Cancer is a very complex disease and research geared towards learning more about its origin, progression, and treatment is intense and always changing. Medical researchers use animals to study cancer for many reasons. Animals have shorter lifespan and more rapid generation times compared to humans, and disease progression moves forward at a more rapid pace, so results of studies using animals as models are obtained …show more content…
New cancer drugs account for 50-60 percent of the gains we have made in cancer survival rates since 1975. Until recently, surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy were the dominant treatments for cancer. But now, thanks to animal-based research, there is a new molecular and genetic understanding of tumor biology, leading to treatments that set out to more directly kill cancer cells, which are molecularly different from normal cells. Use of this knowledge to design drugs that focus on those abnormalities is called rational drug design, and is seen by many as the currently emerging future reality of cancer treatment of "kinder and gentler" cancer therapies that only target abnormal cells. Cancer is no joke and without animal testing we would still be dying from cancer more than we are surviving it and beating it. There are many different types of animal testing when it comes to cancer. There are four different types, animals that develop cancer spontaneously, without any alteration of their genes or the exposure of cancer by chemical treatments, animals who are genetically altered so
To begin with, why is it done? Animal testing is done to protect humans from bad products that may hurt them, also to find ways to cure diseases that haven’t been cure yet. 95 percent of mice and rats are used for research. Mice represented the largest increase in research with their numbers going from 1.2 million to nearly 1.9 million in that period. Other animals also saw increases (Qtd animal experiment up to 73 percent, study says). Other animals that are used in research are rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals, fish, and insects, and also less than one percent cats, and dog’s area also used for research. Another reason is to treat injuries and learn more about the animal bodies to find the similarity to the human body (qtd. animal research). Animal testing is inhumane when testing to protect humans. Some people say testing on animals are life changing experiments and with the help of animal experiment can discover blood transfusion, kidney dialysis, and gene therapy for example cystic fibrosis and types of cancer( Coster 7). Others think experimenting on animal is cruel and they suffer a lot. It is true
Although animal testing has some negatives, it also has some positives. The association, Americans for Medical Processes has stated that “animal-based research has contributed to significant improvement in the length and quality of our lives.” One of the ways in which animal testing has assisted humans is in the treatment of cancer. Due to animal based research, scientists were able to discover new molecular and genetic understandings of tumor biology. This knowledge has lead to treatments that help solve the problem of cancer. Another way in which animal testing has helped humans is in HIV/AIDS. Although there is not a cure for the disease yet, animal testings have helped scientists make custom drugs with less side effects. Also, the knowledge
Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures, treatments, and major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, childhood leukemia, brain injuries, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics. Using animals as research subjects is appropriate because they are similar to human beings in many ways.
The major pro fo animals testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine . Many medical treatments have been made posiible by animal testing . research involving laboratory animals at UCLA leads to many medical breakthoughts that improve peoples lives and hold promise fo additional improvements in treatments and cures . Example : Breast cancer : the UCLA studies utilizing mice were the basis for human clinical trials in patients with breast cancer . The first cancer fighting drug successfully target a specific genetis alteration, thereby limiting side effects such as hairloss and nause that often accompany conventional therapies . Mouse models
An issue that is hotly debated is about animal testing. It is clear that overall animal testing should not be allowed. It shouldn’t be allowed because animal testing does not even do much to the humans, because it can hurt or kill the animals, and finally because these animals that are being tested aren’t being protected the right way. Even though that other people could say that animals are a great replicate of humans and can develop cures. Also they could say that it helps less people get sick, it kills the animals by the scientists not protecting them. Overall animals shouldn’t be tested on.
In conclusion, animal testing, is cruel to animals and very dangerous because of its unreliability. It also i just morally wrong these poor animals live in stress, fear, and pain and is forced upon them without their consent. It is largely inconclusive because animal anatomy is different from human anatomy; results of testing cannot be said to mimic the results in
Animals can be burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused as a result of testing. And the list could go on forever. The way animals are being mistreated and tested on should be against the law. There is a different ways to do research other than killing and abusing animals. There are many alternate test that scientist can use to do there research without harming animals. Alternative test are defined as test that use the three “R’s”, a test that replaces a procedure that uses animals with one that doesn’t, a test that reduces the number of animals used in a procedure, and test that refine a procedure to cause less pain to the animal.(11 Facts about…)
There is no argument that animals have played a critical role in medical research and paved the way for antidotes, cures and remedies for humans throughout history. Aristotle, who lived back in the fourth century B.C., is one of the first to be recorded as experimenting on a living animal. Back in the 1920s there was experimental testing on dogs which gave conclusive evidence to the functions the pancreas has on producing insulin. Before this, diabetes was untreatable, unmanageable and would easily result in death in humans (The Discovery of Insulin). Although testing on animals has been beneficial to us in many instances, there are several examples that prove testing on animals has hurt rather than helped the process. Many scientists argue that the physiological makeup of an animal differs strongly from that of a human resulting in different outcomes of drugs and other experiments. There has been a strong connection between smoking and lung cancer dating back to the 1960s, however all experiments done with animals failed to show
Is Animal Testing Ethical? Right now, innocent animals are suffering due to experimentation for human products. Scientists are testing products and new medical treatments on animals to see if they are safe for human use. The treatments of these animals is also unethical, and they are forced to live in small, cramped spaces.
In source two paragraph three it states “they are susceptible to many of the same conditions including heart disease, cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others.” This tells what animal testing can help make treatments for because animals have many of the same treatments. This also says that animals help cure diseases by being tested on. Source two paragraph four states “Animals must be used in cases when ethical considerations prevent the use of human subjects.” This tells that animals prevent humans from being test subjects. This also tells that animals are used for a substitute to humans because they are both similar to each other. Animals could be hurt or even worse while being tested
Not only does a human get cancer but also a animal can, they also have different types also.
The topic I chose to focus my essay on is animal testing. Animal testing interests me because it has continued to be a problem for years now, it is not just a current issue. It is not just in our country either, this continues to be a problem all over the world. Many people find this to be a controversial topic because companies are using animals in order to test out their new chemicals. There are people in our society who believe that by using animal testing it is furthering our medical research and helping find new cures for many different diseases. Then there are people who choose not to trust the results because it has been tested on an animal rather than a human being. This has been a debatable topic for years and it is safe to say that everyone will always have their own opinion about the issue but, there’s always
Neurologist, Aysha Akhtar, stated that in an experiment with a drug named TGN 1412, the results from the mice, rabbits, and monkeys that it was used on was that the drug was non-toxic. The monkeys in the test were even given “500x” more the dosage amount of humans and when human volunteers in clinical trials were given the drug they almost instantly felt “ill” results. During the year 2003, Pharmaceuticals were told to stop trials of an Alzheimer’s vaccine that had been curing the disease in mice but turned out to cause brain inflammation in humans (Akhtar, Aysha). These kinds of results often get looked over because people think that animals, for the most part, have the same anatomy as humans. Even when results in animal testing do point out flaws of the drugs, we can’t fully rely on the results because they may not be harmful in humans. For example, a drug used to treat leukemia, Gleevec, was almost thrown away because it was found to cause “liver toxicity” in dogs but not humans. This was also true with the drug Cyclosporine, which is used to treat autoimmune disorders and given to patients who have organ donations to prevent rejections (Akhtar,
Animal testing is the ethical issues being addressed in this article. There has been a development with the use of animal research that the drug for Ebola has shown success by being tested on monkeys, and also there is a new treatment for a brain tumor that uses animals. There has been an outpouring from animal rights communities that condemn the use of animals in medical research. These groups are pushing for a ban.
There are numerous tests that animals are put through. Toxicity testing or testing determining if a substance is poisonous or not. Animals are exposed to chemicals through inhalation, ingestion, eye contact, and skin contact. They are induced or other words they were normal until a scientist inject chemicals, microorganisms, or other substances into them to produce a disease or to create symptoms of a specific condition. They are put in cages that are covered in their own feces and excrement in small cramped windowless rooms in a laboratory where they know they are going to die. They are bred to die and that’s their only reason they where born on this earth so that the scientists can test the effects of drugs and disease. Scientists actually stand and watch animals die from diseases. They induce hemophilia (excessive bleeding) in dogs, epilepsy (causes seizures) in mice, glaucoma (eye disease) in rabbits, and deafness in cats.