Why Is Leadership Style Important

The six basic styles of leadership presented (Coercive, Authoritative, Affiliative, Democratic, and Coaching) can have either a net positive or net negative affect on an organizations climate. The basis for being

Leadership goes beyond management, for some, leadership is instinctual and pours over into your personal life. This paper will discuss a leader I admire in my personal life, and analyze their leadership style. I will discuss how that leader has influenced my leadership style, as well as how things like environment and the economy affect my leadership approach.

A leadership philosophy helps to define and let others know what you expect, what things you value, and how you act as a leader. Different styles of leadership are needed for different situations. Every leader needs to know when and how to display a particular approach of leadership within a group. Leadership strategies define every leader’s personal leadership style. Three leadership styles of a counselor are the following: authoritarian style leaders, democratic style leaders, and laissez-faire style leaders.

Urban Meyer is the head coach for The Ohio State Buckeyes football team. He is 49 years old and was born in Toledo Ohio. He attended University of Cincinnati where he played football. Coach Meyer is married and has three children. Prior to coaching Ohio State he retired from coaching was working as a sports analyst for ESPN. Before retiring and working for ESPN, Coach Meyer was the head coach for the University of Florida. He led the Gators to two BCS championship wins and he held the highest percentages of wins for any active college football coach. (www.ohiostatebuckeyes.com).

With that in mind, leadership theory has identified four management styles--authoritarian, democratic, participatory, and laissez-faire. There is inherently nothing wrong with any of them; all have their place at any given time. But it's the communication aspect that is important when implementing any given method of leadership that makes an organization rise or fall, and determines if respect is retained or lost within the group. Stated another way, the problem does not lie in the styles themselves, but rather in the presentation.

In todays work environment with undoubtedly constant business changes and ever-changing goals and objectives, it’s important to understand a groups normalcies and how the group interacts with each other. There are a variety of different leadership styles and characteristics that make up these styles. In this essay we will discuss a Participative leadership style and its affect on teams. We will review the specific tenets a Participative leader follows in order to reach goals. And how this leadership style may be very effective and what possible affects does it foster. How does this leadership styles encourage group conformity and relieve possible pressure of fitting in to a group or team.

Leaders have a profound effect on employee performance because they shape workers’ perceptions of the working environment. Consequently, some leadership styles are more effective with meeting particular objectives. Although personal attributes dictate a leader’s natural leadership style, effective leaders recognize the benefits and limitations of each style, understand the impact a style will have on the organization’s environment, and are capable of developing and incorporating a variety of styles to ensure the desired outcome is achieved.

Most individuals probably feel as if they know enough about leadership to speak on the subject. In many cases, however, this is not truly the case at all. Leadership is a broad concept, and there are several different styles and approaches to consider when studying the topic. It is important to consider these styles and approaches when evaluating the effectiveness, or lack thereof, of any particular form of leadership. With that in mind, this essay will consider the leadership styles of two leaders who are involved in the current presidential election process. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, and Gary Johnson, the Libertarian nominee each utilize different leadership styles, though, the two operate within the same professional arena. That said, the two candidates share the same battle of being outsider candidates struggling to gain notoriety and momentum from a portion of the voting population no longer willing to support mainstream political candidates. This essay begins with a theoretical discussion of leadership and then focuses on the two political leaders, comparing and contrasting each one. This will allow for conclusions to be drawn about how they both work within the same public sphere, while employing different styles to earn votes.

A leader thinks of the group, rather than themselves aiming for a goal. A leader cares for their team and the process taken to reach their goals. A good leader balances their concern for people and concern for production to promote a fair and productive environment. When I think about a good leader, I envision a democratic leadership style because a leader should trust their team members to do their job well and be there for support and manage conflict, not delegate and belittle. When I am leading a group, I take into consideration what I am asking from my team and how I can support them. I try to guide them to easier processes and offer counter points while letting them create the final product. I focus on relationship-oriented leadership

Coaching competencies are needed in the growing industry around the world, especially for leadership development. According to Zenger and Stinnett (2006), about 70% of formal leadership development programs in organizations have some different forms of coaching. This reveals that coaching is becoming a World Wide phenomenon. As a result of this popularity, many coaching competencies, models, tools and training have appeared. For instance, effective coaching requires the coach to have good communication skill, client motivation, self-management, and technical skill. These skills enable the coaching session come up with positive success.

Describe your own leadership style in terms of one or more of the theories covered in class, and discuss how your leadership style contributes to your organization’s culture and climate.

What is leadership? Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines leadership as “the power or ability to lead other people”. Although this is simply put, it is also correct. But leadership is much more than the ability to lead. The ability is one piece of the puzzle. Other pieces to consider in leadership are education, attributes, and style, just to name a few. In this assignment, I will focus on leadership style. Specifically, I will discuss my style according to the assessment developed by The University of Kent in the UK.

I define leadership as the ability to provide strength and coverage to support a Sailor, regardless of rank. The ability to instill Core Values, provide training and the tools a Sailor will need to excel in both their professional and personal life. A true leader will support a Sailor, any Sailor, during the high times of a career, but to be a solid force if there are any lows.

An effective leader influences their employees in a desired manner to achieve goals and objectives. Different leadership styles can affect an organization’s effectiveness and performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the review of literature on various leadership styles over the past years and how effective and ineffective different leadership styles are in the workplace.

Leadership style definitions have evolved from trait centric theories of a “Great Man” (Jogulu & Wood, 2006) to today’s highly regarded transformational style (Limsila & Ogunlana, 2008). Organizations have become employee oriented instead of production oriented, elevating employee performance to new heights (Limsila & Ogunlana, 2008). Target is highly Team Member oriented, albeit to a fault which reduces its ability to deliver. Target values face-to-face meetings to ensure all stakeholders are on board before implementing. Meetings are challenging to schedule because of required attendee and room availability. Team Members are granted unlimited sick and volunteer time away, not to mention they are expected to meet with their network regularly. Execution halts while Team Members wait to meet.