Is William Shakespeare worth teaching in the ninth grade curriculum? Shakespeare is not worth teaching in the ninth grade curriculum.Shakespeare lived from 1564 to 1616 he was 52 years old when he died, He wrote 38 plays. poems and sonnets. He was an english playwright, poet and actor. His plays have been translated into 75 different languages. That's all we know about him.
First, Shakespeare is irrelevant. “The board's work don’t reflect the cultural perspective need in today’s classroom.” (Deblasis).“The trouble is that most school children today don’t like him and don’t get it.” (Robshaw) This is true, most students in the U.S don't find the boards work interesting.
Secondly, Shakespeare does not strike modern day teenagers. “Force feeding
Shakespeare died 400 years ago. He is the only required author in the 9th grade Common Core. Why is that? Shakespeare is a world-known English, actor, playwright, and writer. He wrote 38 plays, poems, and sonnets. He is being taught in freshman English classes in high schools, and making these freshmen miserable. Shakespeare should not be included in the 9th grade curriculum because it is hard to understand, not relevant, and meant for the theatre and not a
First and foremost, reading Shakespeare’s work leads to a better understanding of the English language. The bard had a vocabulary of over 24,000 words, most of which still exist in modern English. High school students enhance their vocabulary and sentence structure through reading his work. The subconscious use of new words and phrases through reading Shakespeare’s works leads to improved writing and oral skills. The extension of vocabulary is very helpful in post-secondary education; students will have better results with assignments such as presentations, reports, and essays. Not only are Shakespeare’s works useful in becoming familiar with the English language, the themes in his plays are still relevant to society.
Some people might say that Shakespeare makes great plays that people enjoy. Finally,Shakespeare is very difficult to understand and it's very hard to comprehend when it's being taught by a teacher. The teachers can teach about more modern writers that we might be able to understand. Shakespeare is 400 years old and i think we should be learning more about writers from the twenty first century. That's why Shakespeare should not be taught in high schools around the
Students aren't the only ones who need to learn the message behind Shakespeare, adults at times need to as well. The message teaches people about the world, and about how peoples decisions catch up with them at times."Shakespeare Teaches us about love, honor, duty. About parents and children. About ambition and greed. These are the things that all of us face, the things that make us human." (J. Holtham, 2). The message is quite clear in a way. If Shakespeare can teach us about human conditions, then anyone can. "I don’t believe that a long-dead, British guy is the only writer who can teach my students about human condition. I do not believe that not viewing "Romeo and Juliet" or any other modern adaptation of a Shakespeare play will make my students less able to go out into the world and understand language or human behavior." (Dana Dusbiber, 1). There are other authors out in the world who have the same message, why not read a new author, rather than Shakespeare? Shakespeare uses his own words in his own way, to show that what he is trying to tell us about love and greed, are important, and no one else could teach us better. "Shakespeare is more then just a 'long-old dead British guy' and I believe he has as much to teach us about the
The morals and values presented in his works speak to the audience, often offering a new perspective on the world in which they live. Students are affected by the powerful and complex characters and are rewarded with profound insights into human nature and behavior.I firmly believe that Shakespeare's works, like no other literature in the high school curriculum, challenge and invigorate the minds of students. Because of the complex characters, difficult vocabulary and style in which he writes, students must elevate their level of learning to grasp a clear understanding of his works. Shakespeare's plays hold intricate meanings and messages. His
If one was able to look into our classroom, they would see the kids rushing to the whiteboard to try and get a part that they can read. Spots filled, they anxiously wait to continue on with the story. Then that person would ask, “Why would they be so excited to read something so old and outdated?” Well to answer, it’s because Shakespeare’s work is still applicable to our lives today. Shakespeare should stay in the 9th grade curriculum, because it strongly relates to today's day and age, keeps the kids in the class active and paying attention, and helps convey a strong message that everyone should follow.
Do you ever wonder why Shakespeare is still taught in high school. In high school, Shakespeare was shoved down our throats and I despised Shakespeare and his works. I thought that they were pointless and was just a way to torture high school students, but the more I think about what Shakespeare is trying to teach through his works. The more I respect and understand the themes and the language of his works. The more that you understand the more that you can relate, the more that you can relate the more that you can reflect on the things that you have learned. In this essay, I will argue that Shakespeare’s works are important to learn . I will support my argument by explaining the universal themes in Shakespeare’s
His work touched an extensive amount of different topics and themes, all of which are still relevant today. His writing is the foundation of some of the most classic literature, and a great amount of modern pieces can be traced back to his style and ideas in some way. His language deepens the analytical, reading and writing skills of young readers, and develops an appreciation for the progression of the English language through time. If Shakespeare were to be terminated from school curriculums, students would lose important, education enhancing aspects of English and would be unable to create a far more in-depth understanding of the literary work of the past and
Where will student be today if it wasn’t for Shakespeare? Student wouldn’t be living the life if it wasn’t for Shakespeare? Shakespeare was a great writer making some of the best plays of his time for example Romeo and Juliet. This is why I believe Shakespeare should be in the 9th grade curriculum, because in the 9th grade people should know about Shakespeare, also some student should know about Shakespeare because is good to know what Shakespeare has done for
Shakespeare is dead. Shakespeare is not relevant in today’s times. It is very boring for students to listen to the material, and only a certain type of personality can appreciate Shakespeare.
To commence, shakspeare and his works should not be taught in schools because his works are not relevant for students in modern day society and education. Students today need something modern in order to relate to and understand the topic. In On the Bard's birthday, is Shakespeare still relevant? by Alexandra Petri, Petri states that “Whenever I want to depress myself, I make a list of Shakespeare plays
“For all but a few...reading Shakespeare is a form of torture” (Robshaw 402) and “few people realize how much englished has changed in the last generation” (Robshaw 401). Shakespeare was taught so long ago that the generation we’re in now is much different, so the students now days don't really want to learn it because it's so old. Our English teachers should teach more things that are of our generation than teach us about 400 years ago.
Should Shakespeare be in the ninth grade curriculum? Thats a great question, well Shakespeare was born in 1564,Stratford-upon-Avon, United Kingdom and he died in April 23, 1616. Nobody really knew when he was born or knew like everything about him. But all that we know is that he was an amazing poet and the Bard still makes a big impact on a lot of people lives now a days. The question is should Shakespeare still be taught in classes and I think he should because he wrote practically almost everything that we know and face today.
To begin with, Shakespeare is not culturally diverse to represent today's students. As DeBlasis states, “... school reading lists aren’t as diverse as they should be with many still largely comprised works by men.” Reading lists are mostly made up of white men that lived many years ago. They do not include many women or men of color. These lists should include many more ethnicity groups for students, making learning and reading more fun for students, rather than reading things that they can’t relate to. In summary, Shakespeare is not diverse enough for students to be taught in a classroom.
William Shakespeare's Relevance Today For as long as formal education has existed in Britain it has been a largely standard assumption that teaching the works of William Shakespeare is relevant and necessary. Perhaps the relevance of his writing is taken for granted, perhaps it is necessary to re-examine the role of Shakespeare for the modern audience. There are indeed many people who question the relevance of this 440 year old playwright to a 21st century audience, taking it even as far as perhaps the greatest heresy of all, questioning the necessity of GCSE pupils learning Shakespeare at all. This “proposed vandalism from the policymakers” (Guardian 09/02/01) is opposed wholesale by supporters