Condoleezza Rice, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Nancy Pelosi are four women leaders who have broken the glass ceiling in the world of politics and leadership. The one specific, predominant, and common characteristic that three of these superwomen possess that may be the reason for their success is their diplomatic ways and mirroring styles. Condoleezza Rice, Hillary Clinton, and Nancy Pelosi are the three leaders who have strategically incorporated the ability to mirror those they have dealings with.
Men have often mirrored each other with wearing the same color suits. IBM was good with this concept as they required all employees to wear navy blue suits – both men and women. It became their “preference” and their “identity.”
…show more content…
It made it a “club” effect. People feel comfortable if they are in surrounding with people who dress the same, think the same, and act the same. For women, this was not the case until more and more women became part of the political world where they had a say. In order to make the “scene” comfortable, the women dress, talk, and act like those they will be keeping company. It is quite appropriate to see Hillary Clinton dress in the garb of foreign countries when dining with the wives of political leaders. It is the ice-breaker that leads to “breaking the glass ceiling.”
Leader They Most Resemble
President Barack Obama dresses the traditional garb of the country he visits. He feels this is a way to connect with the people of the country. It brings with it the idea of meeting on the same level. It creates a neutral ground and it allows for opening the door for conversation about each other than intimidation. Condoleezza Rice, Hillary Clinton, and Nancy Pelosi all have followed this technique and it works well for them.
The Leadership Theory They Would Utilize Effectively
There are eight leadership theories that could be utilized in their efforts to “fit in.” These theories are as follows:
• Great Man
• Trait
• Contingency
• Situational
• Behavioral
• Participative
• Management
• Relationship
The theory they would utilize most effectively based on
This semester, we learned specific ways to build our leadership capabilities by reading “How Remarkable Women Lead” by Joanna Barsh and Susie Cranston, researching Boston women leaders, interviewing a present day woman leader, and reading a group book. Throughout all of these resources and research, common themes of how to be a successful leader emerged. Not only did I learn more about leadership in general, but I also found ways to improve my own leadership without going too much out of my comfort zone. The important lessons of leading with perseverance, framing, and an activist's mindset thoroughly influenced my identity as a leader and gave me new tactics to grow as a person.
There are volumes written on leadership theory in nearly every discipline. Bolman and Deal sifted through the complex theories and literature and combined with their own analyses, theories and experience devised a four-frame model as a way of understanding organizations and leadership within organizations. Frames are described as being the lens through which anyone sees the world and places that world in order (University of Melbourne). Frames help individuals to filter out the things in the world they do not want to see, thus, frames are inherently inaccurate and skewed in terms of reality (University of Melbourne). But, people need
A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment
Through the combination of regional traditions, works of previous First Ladies as well as utilizing European templates, “she created a national etiquette and social style suitable for a seat of government, one that could display power, enhance the status of the rulers, and facilitate the process of building a capital, a government structure, and a nation.” This presents a significant example as to how women were capable of shaping the rhetoric and structure of the American political culture as well as governmental
The way you are dressed is linked to the way you are or at least in the story “The ministers Black veil you are.In the story “The Ministers Black Veil” By Nathaniel Hawthorne a man that goes by the anme of Mr. Hooper decided to wear a black veil, in doing so everyone saw him as a monster, freak, and scary, the people disliked it.The way people begin to look at Mr. Hooper happens a lot in reality, People will look at the nicely dressed people as successful and the people who are dressed with bad or ragged clothing as unsuccessful.
There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.
In today's modern era, jobs are requiring employees to attire dress code in order for the company to look professional and well maintained. Also it is becoming a safety regulation on how some clothes are worn.
What Leadership theories covered in class are reflected in the book? Explain how, using examples.
The world has become aesthetically poorer for this change, as the result of which brightness and contrast have been replaced by dullness and similarity. There can be little doubt, however, that the drastic reduction of the decorative element in male clothing has, to some extent, achieved its aim.
Out of all the different leadership theories I learned about this semester I really feel that I best relate to transformational leadership and authentic leadership theories. During the development of my personal theory I found that these theories tended to list many similar traits, and values that aligned with my own. Additionally, both authentic and transformative theories place a significant amount of emphasis on the relationship between the leader and her/his followers. The success and influence of a leader comes not from herself but from her ability to create and invoke strong relationships with their followers. Given my character strengths of sociability, integrity, assertiveness, and my drive to connect to others on a deeper level, I value both the authentic and the transformative leadership theories.
The contents and assignment in this course has helped me understand the various theories of leadership and how different leadership styles can have a negative or positive effect on followers and organizations. The leadership theories helped me understand the concept of leadership better because it educates me on the different leadership options that are available. Leadership and followership is not based on specific characteristics. Leaders must draw from things and approaches to find the right style. A follower’s attitude determines the way a leader leads. According to Johnson (2011) “Being a good follower means ensuring your boss is supported, but only if he is making optimum decisions”.
According to Yuki, G. (2010) there are five different leadership approaches that are being researched. These five approaches are:
Instead of adopting a single leadership theory, I have embraced aspects of the following theories that I feel align with my personal approach to
This can include everything from how a person dresses to how long they took to prepare a presentation. Consider a manager going out to a factory to address the staff. If they wear a suit and cuff links, the factory staff will find it difficult to see past the suit and hear the message. All they will see is a stuffed shirt coming from head office to give them news they assume they don’t want to hear.
To gain knowledge of how we communicate to others through the way we dress, we have to first understand what identity is. Identity is what we choose to represent ourselves as, be that a gender identity, a sexual identity; it is completely up to the individual as a person to make that choice. Identity forms the basis of one’s pride and being accepted socially only adds to that ego and integrity. The psychology of the matter is the way we dress is more or less based on our moods, habits, inspirations, past, present and future. The character of a person is reflected in the way that they dress, Clothing can act as a simple glance into someone’s life, as we are already know that different clothing can represent different means of culture; Clothes are used a language to communicate with society and to commonly let them know what you want to be viewed as.