18. if we got the the following regression result Yi= -2.5 - 10 (Xi) when the number of observation =100. then as Xi increase, Yi will and when Xi increases by 10, Yi will.by.* increase, decrease, 10 increase, increase, 100 incease, increase, 10 decrease, decrease, 100 decrease, increase, 10 decrease, increase, 100

18. if we got the the following regression result Yi= -2.5 - 10 (Xi) when the number of observation =100. then as Xi increase, Yi will and when Xi increases by 10, Yi will.by.* increase, decrease, 10 increase, increase, 100 incease, increase, 10 decrease, decrease, 100 decrease, increase, 10 decrease, increase, 100

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter4A: Problems In Applying The Linear Regression Model

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is Heteroscedastic? And is there a way to fix data in case of heteroscedasticity presence ?
Explain what multicollinearity . What are the main problems that multicollinearity creates for OLS estimation results ? Give two ways to detect multicollinearity problem and the hypothesis that are tested ?
1. Let kids denote the number of children ever born to a woman, and let educ denote years of education for the woman. A simple model relating fertility to years of education is kids = 0 + 1educ + u, where u is the unobserved error. (a) What kinds of factors are contained in u? Are these likely to be correlated with level of education? (b) Will a simple regression analysis uncover the ceteris paribus eect of education on fertility? Explain.
In the December, 1969, American Economic Review (pp. 886-896), Nathanial Leff reports thefollowing least squares regression results for a cross section study of the effect of age composition onsavings in 74 countries in 1964:log S/Y = 7.3439 + 0.1596 log Y/N + 0.0254 log G - 1.3520 log D1 - 0.3990 log D2 (R2= 0.57)log S/N = 8.7851 + 1.1486 log Y/N + 0.0265 log G - 1.3438 log D1 - 0.3966 log D2 (R2= 0.96)where S/Y = domestic savings ratio, S/N = per capita savings, Y/N = per capita income, D1 = percentage ofthe population under 15, D2 = percentage of the population over 64, and G = growth rate of per capitaincome. Are these results correct? Explain..
With Panel Data, if we assume that the individual effects vi are not correlated with the regressors Xit (i.e. E(vi|Xit) = 0), which one of the following statements is correct: The Fixed Effects estimator is not consistent. Both the OLS and the Random Effects estimators are not consistent. The OLS estimator is not consistent, but the Random Effects estimator is consistent. The OLS and the Random Effects estimator are consistent. All of the above. None of the above
2. Which of the following types of regressions will always have a binary outcome variable? (A) Probit (B) Difference-in-differences (C) Regression discontinuity (D) (A) and (B) will both have binary outcome variables
Is auto correlation possible in cross-sectional data? why?
look at the influence of mileage on the sale price of each brand ofautomobile. Postulate the following statistical models,?_ℎ????? = ?0 + ?1?????? + ?? and ?_?ℎ??? = ?0 + ?1?????? + ?? with ??~?(0, ?2).For each model (‘model_honda’ and ‘model_chev’) perform the following,Comment on the miles variable after examining it with hist() and summary() commands.What does the assumption of non-random independent variable imply about how thedata must be collected if the same miles variable is used for both brand of automobile?
If we run a regression where y (bankruptcy) = f (factors potentially predicting bankruptcy), what is the dependent variable?
et R2unrestricted and R2restricted be 0.54 and 0.30 respectively. The difference between the unrestricted and the restricted model is that you have imposed two restrictions. The number of regressors in the unrestricted model is 5. There are 500 observations. The F-statistic (under the assumption of homoskedasticity) in this case is 1. 4.61 2. 8.01 3. 98.5 4. 128.9
Suppose we use the linear probability model to estimate the effect of household income on the willingness to avail a loan product. Given a regression equation: Willingness = 22.34 -0.04HouseholdIncome, with HouseholdIncome measured in hundreds of pesos. How is -0.04 interpreted?
Without running any additional tests, what can you say about the joint significance of all independent variables in the model? Which statistic(s) helps you to answer this question?