2) Veronica is going to sell two vases to a dealer. She can sell each vase for $10. In order to bring her vases to the dealer, Veronica needs to take a bus. There is a 50% chance that all the vases carried on one bus trip will be broken during the trip and a 50% chance that none of the vases carried on one bus trip will be broken during the trip. A roundtrip bus ticket costs $1. Veronica’s net income is given by the revenues from the sale of her vases minus the cost of her bus trip(s). 2a) How many trips would Veronica make if she were risk-neutral? 2b) Suppose that Veronica's utility from income is u(w)=100ln(x+w), and that she has no wealth other than the vases (also allow her to have negative wealth as in when she takes two vases on the same trip and both break while she paid the fare). What is the expected utility of net income when Veronica takes both vases on one bus trip? And when she makes two trips? What strategy is preferred? 2c) Would Veronica's preferred strategy change if the bus fare were increased to $3?

2) Veronica is going to sell two vases to a dealer. She can sell each vase for $10. In order to bring her vases to the dealer, Veronica needs to take a bus. There is a 50% chance that all the vases carried on one bus trip will be broken during the trip and a 50% chance that none of the vases carried on one bus trip will be broken during the trip. A roundtrip bus ticket costs $1. Veronica’s net income is given by the revenues from the sale of her vases minus the cost of her bus trip(s). 2a) How many trips would Veronica make if she were risk-neutral? 2b) Suppose that Veronica's utility from income is u(w)=100ln(x+w), and that she has no wealth other than the vases (also allow her to have negative wealth as in when she takes two vases on the same trip and both break while she paid the fare). What is the expected utility of net income when Veronica takes both vases on one bus trip? And when she makes two trips? What strategy is preferred? 2c) Would Veronica's preferred strategy change if the bus fare were increased to $3?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter7: Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

For the following questions consider this setting. The deciding shot in a soccer game comes down to a penalty shot. If the goal-keeper jumps in one corner and the striker shots the ball in the other, then it is a goal. If the goalie jumps left and the striker shoots left, then it is a goal with probability 1/3. If the goalie jumps right and the striker shots right, it is goal with probability 2/3. QUESTION Say the goalie's strategy is to jump left with probability 1 and the striker shoots left with probability 0.5, then the probability of a goal is (round to two digits) QUESTION If the striker shoots in either corner with probability 0.5 and the goalie likewise shoots in either corner with probability 0.5, then the probability of a goal is (round to 2 digits)
Matthew is playing snooker (more difficult variant of pool) with his friend. He is not sure which strategy to choose for his next shot. He can try and pot a relatively difficult red ball (strategy R1), which he will pot with probability 0.4. If he pots it, he will have to play the black ball, which he will pot with probability 0.3. His second option (strategy R2) is to try and pot a relatively easy red, which he will pot with probability 0.7. If he pots it, he will have to play the blue ball, which he will pot with probability 0.6. His third option, (strategy R3) is to play safe, meaning not trying to pot any ball and give a difficult shot for his opponent to then make a foul, which will give Matthew 4 points with probability 0.5. If potted, the red balls are worth 1 point each, while the blue ball is worth 5 points, and the black ball 7 points. If he does not pot any ball, he gets 0 point. By using the EMV rule, which strategy should Matthew choose? And what is his expected…
For the following questions consider this setting. The deciding shot in a soccer game comes down to a penalty shot. If the goal-keeper jumps in one corner and the striker shots the ball in the other, then it is a goal. If the goalie jumps left and the striker shoots left, then it is a goal with probability 1/3. If the goalie jumps right and the striker shots right, it is goal with probability 2/3. Say the goalie's strategy is to jump left with probability 1 and the striker shoots left with probability 0.5, then the probability of a goal is (round to two digits) If the striker shoots in either corner with probability 0.5 and the goalie likewise shoots in either corner with probability 0.5, then the probability of a goal is (round to 2 digits)
Each of the two players independently (and simultaneously with the other) decides whether to go to a play or a concert. Each would rather go with the other to a concert than with them to a play, but prefers this to not being together, in which case they don't care where they go alone. Additionally, each is indifferent between attending the play together and participating in a lottery where both go to the concert with a probability of ¾ and to different events with a probability of ¼. Describe the game in matrix form and find all its equilibria under the assumption that the players have von Neumann-Morgenstern preferences.
A risk-averse manager is considering a project that will cost £100. There is a 10 percent chance the project will generate revenues of £100, an 80 percent chance it will yield revenues of £50, and a 10 percent chance it will yield revenues of £500. Should the manager adopt the project? Explain. What will a risk-neutral and risk-loving manager do in the same situation?
6. Jerry plans to buy a new Bluetooth headset. He knows that the same product is offered in different shops with prices of $44, $49, and $60, and with odds of one-third of finding each price. He just stopped at a shop and knows that their price is $49. If the search cost is $1 per additional search, what should Jerry do?
A thousand used cars are for sale in Boston. Some of the cars are of good quality (“plums”), and some are not (“lemons”), but the buyer cannot tell the difference between the two qualities; of course the seller knows whether the car is a lemon or a plum. Suppose that consumers are willing to pay $4,000 for a lemon and $6,400 for a plum; and sellers are willing to sell a lemon for $3,500 and a plum for $5,600. a. If there is a 40% chance that a car is a lemon, how many cars will be sold? And what is the maximum consumer surplus in this case. b. If there is a 10% chance that a car is a lemon, how many cars will be sold? And what is the maximum consumer surplus in this case? Kindly answer in detail with all steps
If a risk‐averse individual owns a home worth $100,000, and that individual iswilling to pay a maximum of $1,000 for an annual fire insurance policy that covers theentire loss in the event of a fire, then we know that:A. There is a one percent chance that the home will be destroyed by fire inthe next yearB. There is a greater than a one percent chance that the home will bedestroyed by fire in the next yearC. There is less than a one percent chance that the home will be destroyedby fire in the next yearD. None of the above is correct
Suppose that Winnie the Pooh and Eeyore have the same value function: v(x) = x1/2 for gains and v(x) = -2(|x|)1/2 for losses. The two are also facing the same choice, between (S) $1 for sure and (G) a gamble with a 25% chance of winning $4 and a 75% chance of winning nothing. Winnie the Pooh and Eeyore both subjectively weight probabilities correctly. Winnie the Pooh codes all outcomes as gains; that is, he takes as his reference point winning nothing. For Pooh: What is the value of S? What is the value of G? Which would he choose? Eeyore codes all outcomes as losses; that is, he takes as his reference point winning $4. For Eeyore: What is the value of S? What is the value of G? Which would he choose?
In a final round of a MegaMillion TV show, a contestant has won $1 millionand has a chance of doubling the reward. If he loses his winnings drop to$500,000. The contestant thinks his chances of winning are 50%. Should heplay? What is the lowest probability of a correct guess that will make his betprofitable? Show work
You and a rival are engaged in a game in which there are three possible outcomes: you win, your rival wins (you lose), or the two of you tie. You get a payoff of 50 if you win, a payoff of 20 if you tie, and a payoff of 0 if you lose. What is your expected payoff in each of the following situations? (a) There is a 50% chance that the game ends in a tie, but only a 10% chance that you win. (There is thus a 40% chance that you lose.) (b) There is a 50–50 chance that you win or lose. There are no ties. (c) There is an 80% chance that you lose, a 10% chance that you win, and a 10% chance that you tie.
First Fiddler's Bank has foreclosed on a home mortgage and is selling the house at auction. There are three bidders for the house, Ernie, Teresa, and Marilyn. First Fiddler's does not know the willingness to pay of these three bidders for the house, but on the basis of its previous experience, the bank believes that each of these bidders has a probability of 1/3 of valuing it at $600,000, a probability of 1/3 of valuing at $500,000, and a probability of 1/3 of valuing it at $200,000. First Fiddler's believes that these probabilities are in de pendent among buyers. If First Fiddler's sells the house by means of a second- bidder, sealed- bid auction (Vickrey auction), what will be the bank's expected revenue from the sale? (Choose the closest option.) The closest option is 448, 148. Please explain in details thank you.