3). respective indifference curves, endowment (@), and contract curve. ; Consider the following Edgeworth Box, with consumers A and B and their a) Take points a and B. For each of these points, explain in no more than three sentences why or why not this point can be a Pareto equilibrium given the endowment w. b) Explain and show graphically how government policy can turn point y into a Pareto equilibrium.

3). respective indifference curves, endowment (@), and contract curve. ; Consider the following Edgeworth Box, with consumers A and B and their a) Take points a and B. For each of these points, explain in no more than three sentences why or why not this point can be a Pareto equilibrium given the endowment w. b) Explain and show graphically how government policy can turn point y into a Pareto equilibrium.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter13: General Equilibrium And Welfare

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13.5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Bluth’s preferences for paper and houses can be expressed as Ub(p, h) = 2pb + hb, while Scott’s preferences can be expressed as Us(p, h) = ps + 2bs. Bluth begins with no paper and 10 houses, whereas Scott begins with 10 units of paper and no houses. 1. Is the starting endowment Pareto efficient? Justify your answer using an Edgeworth box? Determine whether each of the following price pairs is consistent with a competitive equilibrium. If yes, determine the resulting allocation of goods, sketching that equi- librium in your Edgeworth box. If not, explain why not (for what good is there a shortage, for what good is there a surplus?) pp =$3 and ph =$1 along with pp =$1 and ph =$1 Assume that the price of houses is $1. Given that price, determine the highest price pp that is consistent with a competitive equilibrium.
A fixed amount of a good has to be allocated between two individuals, h = 1; 2 with utility functions Where xh is the amount of the good allocated to consumer h. a. How should be allocated to maximize a utilitarian SWF? Illustrate the answer graphically. How do the optimal values of x1 and x2 change among the cases a1 2, a1 = a2, and a1 > a2? b. What is the allocation maximizing the Bernoulli-Nash SWF ? Illustrate graphically. How do the optimal values of x1 and x2 change with the preference parameters a1 and a2? c. What is the allocation maximizing the maxim in-Rawlins SWF? Illustrate graphically. How does the allocation change with preference parameters a1 and a2?
Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion Consider an exchange economy consisting of two people, A and B, endowed with two goods, 1 and 2. Person A is initially endowed with ωA = (0,10) and person B is initially endowed with ωB = (11,0). They have identical preferences, which are given by U^A(x1,x2) = U^B(x1,x2) = x1^2*x2. Suppose that p2 =1. Under the competitive equilibrium, what is p1? Round answers to two decimal places.
Problem 5 Consider an exchange economy with two people: Will and Bob; and two goods: apples and bananas. Will's initial endowment is 10 apples and 5 bananas. Bob's initial endowment is 5 apples and 10 bananas. Will likes apples and hates bananas. Bob likes both apples and bananas. The preferences of both Will and Bob are strictly convex. (a) Draw an Edgeworth Box with apples on the horizontal axes. Put Will at the bottom left corner and Bob at the top right corner. Show the initial endowment and label it with W.
Consider a two-good two-consumer exchange economy where u1 = X1Y1 and u2 = X2Y2, endowment of person 1 = (3, 4) and endowment of person 2= (2, 2). Setting the price of good Y to one (Py = 1), what is the price of good X in the competitive equilibrium? 01 0 6/5 O 3/5 O 3/2
Please explain how Jack and Cody can maxmise utility through living in the same household with a unitary and non-unitary models. Unitary models - Mutual altruism (or any unitary model) Non-unitary models - Copertive models - Collective + Bargaining model.(or any Non-unitary models)
Consider an Edgeworth box economy, where preferences and endowments are given by. ( attached below ) In the following, use the normalization p2 = 1.(a) Find all the Pareto optimal allocations (use x1 to parameterize thePO allocations). (b) Suppose the government wants individual 1 to have the bundle x1 = (5, 9). Show whether the government can induce this outcome an equilib- rium with transfers. Find the supporting prices and transfers if possible. (c) State the Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare and explain how the result in part (b) relates to that theorem. (d) Suppose the government does not care what bundle individual 1 gets and only wants to ensure that the individual 1 receives utility level equal to 45. Show whether this can be achieved as an equilibrium with transfers. Find the supporting prices and transfers if possible.
Chris and Dana live in an exchange economy with two goods: good Q and good R. Chris starts off with an endowment of 6 units of Q and 10 units of R. Dana starts off with an endowment of 8 units of Q and 8 units of R. Suppose that the price of good R is pR=1 and the price of good Q is pQ=2. a )At these prices, does the market clear? Yes or no? Explain your answer. b) What relationship must hold between the consumption of each agent and the price of the two goods at the market clearing equilibrium? Write the equation
a) Suppose demand for good X is given by QD = 900- p/2 where p is the price and QD the quantity demanded. Supply is given by QS = p/4. Suppose 60 TL tax is imposed on each unit of X that is purchased. What is the burden of the tax? Explain the key factors that determine the incidence of the tax. b) Describe the main differences between partial and general equilibrium analysis in the context of examining tax incidence.
Consider an exchange economy with 2 agents and 2 goods. In an Edgeworth-Bowley diagram, show and illustrate that if both agents have the same preferences, the contract curve is a straight line from the bottom left-hand corner to the top right-hand corner. Does it follow that if the agents do not have the same preferences, the contract curve is not a straight line? Suppose the two agents have the same endowments and the same preferences. Is mutually beneficial trade possible? Illustrate in an Edgeworth Bowley diagram. State and explain Walras Law. What are the implications of Walras’s Law? Illustrate Walras Law in an Edgeworth-Bowley diagram.
Consider a pure exchange economy, where each consumer has preferences described by a Cobb-Douglas utility function. Both consumers have exactly the same endowment. In such an economy, an equitable distribution of goods (where each individual consumes exactly half of each good) is a Walrasian equilibrium allocation? a. always, for any consumers' preferences b. only if consumers' preferences are exactly the same c. Never d. None of the above
Question 2 Demonstrate, by way of example, and explain fully, taking noting of the underlying assumptions, how you would derive Hicksian and Marshallian demand functions. What are the differences between these? Question 3 In the Walrasian world, Pareto optimal allocations are crucial in establishing an equilibrium outcome with respect to welfare. Give an exposition of the two Welfare Theorems, demonstrating also that they are Pareto efficient