# 8. Ann can finish a project either this week or next week. The delayed rewardsare 10 in either case. (The project can be done only once or not at all).Next week is busy and the cost of finishing the project are lower this week. Theimmediate costs are 4 this week and 6 next week.Ann has a quasi-hyperbolic utility with & = 1 and B < 1. Imagine that Anndoes not finish the project this week. Then she should finish it next week(A) if ß > 0.6; (B) if ß > 0.4; (C) only if ß = 1; (D) for any ß.9. Suppose that B = 0.5 and Ann correctly anticipates her choice next week. Thenshe should finish the project(A) this week; (B) next week; (C) never; (D) not enough information.10. Suppose that ß = 0.5, and Ann can commit to finish the project next week (e.g.by imposing a heavy cost on herself if the project is not finished next week).Then she will(A) do the project this week;(B) commit to do it next week and finish it then;(C) do it next week without commitment3;(D) commit and then not finish it.

Question
109 views

#9 and 10

check_circle

Step 1

Quasi Hyperbolic Discounting:

Since Ann correctly anticipates her choice next week, she\\'s a sophisticated quasi-hyperbolic  discounter in the second week.

Step 2

When costs are immediate and rewards are delayed,  Sophisticated discounters know that they will be able to do task in period  2 so they procrastinate. In period 2, when they know that they will not be able to do it in period 3, so they do the task in period 2.

Ut for period 2 is -1 and Ut for not doing the project = 0. As Ut for not doing the project at all is better, Ann should not do the project at all.

Step 3

As Ut for not doing the project at all is better, Ann ...

### Want to see the full answer?

See Solution

#### Want to see this answer and more?

Solutions are written by subject experts who are available 24/7. Questions are typically answered within 1 hour.*

See Solution
*Response times may vary by subject and question.
Tagged in