8. Ann can finish a project either this week or next week. The delayed rewardsare 10 in either case. (The project can be done only once or not at all).Next week is busy and the cost of finishing the project are lower this week. Theimmediate costs are 4 this week and 6 next week.1 and B < 1. Imagine that AnnAnn has a quasi-hyperbolic utility with &|3Ddoes not finish the project this week. Then she should finish it next week(A) if ß > 0.6; (B) if ß > 0.4; (C) only if ß = 1; (D) for any ß.

The correct answer is option C .i.e. Only if β = 1.In the question we are given that, the delayed…

Answered: 8. Ann can finish a project either this…

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter6: Consumer Choices

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1SCQ: Jeremy is deeply in love with Jasmine. Jasmine lives where cell phone coverage is poor, so he can...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Edna is living in a retirement home where home where most of her needs are taken care of, but she has some discretionary spending. Based on the basket of goods in Table 22.5, by what percentage does Ednas cost of living increase between time 1 and time 2
Would you expect total utility to rise or fall with additional consumption of a good? Why?
Jeremy is deeply in love with Jasmine. Jasmine lives where cell phone coverage is poor, so he can either call her on the land-line phone for five cents per minute or he can drive to see her, at a roundâ€”trip cost of 2 in gasoline money. He has a total of 10 per week to spend on staying in touch. To make his preferred choice, Jeremy uses a handy utilimometer that measures his total utility from personal visits and from phone minutes. Using the values in Table 6.6, figure out the points 011 Jeremys consumption choice budget constraint (it may be helpful to do a sketch) and identify his utility-maximizing point.
Suppose Alphonsos town raises the price of bus tickets from 0.50 to 1 and file price of burgers rises from 2 to 4. Why is file opportunity cost of bus tickets unchanged? Suppose Alphonsns weekly spending money increases from 10 to 20. How is his budget constraint affected from all three changes? Explain.
Ann can finish a project either this week or next week. The delayed rewardsare 10 in either case. (The project can be done only once or not at all).Next week is busy and the cost of finishing the project are lower thisweek. Theimmediate costs are 4 this week and 6 next week.Ann has a quasi-hyperbolic utility withδ= 1 andβ <1. Imagine that Anndoes not finish the project this week. Then she should finish it next week (A) ifβ >0.6; (B) ifβ >0.4; (C) only ifβ= 1; (D) for anyβ.11. Suppose thatβ= 0.5 and Ann correctly anticipates her choice next week. Thenshe should finish the project (A) this week; (B) next week; (C) never; (D) not enough information. Suppose thatβ= 0.5, and Ann can commit to finish the project next week (e.g.by imposing a heavy cost on herself if the project is not finished nextweek).Then she will (A) do the project this week;(B) commit to do it next week and finish it then;(C) do it next week without commitment;(D) commit and then not finish it.
Ann can finish a project either this week or next week. The delayed rewardsare 10 in either case. (The project can be done only once or not at all).Next week is busy and the cost of finishing the project are lower thisweek. Theimmediate costs are 4 this week and 6 next week.Ann has a quasi-hyperbolic utility withδ= 1 andβ <1. Imagine that Anndoes not finish the project this week. Then she should finish it next week (A) ifβ >0.6; (B) ifβ >0.4; (C) only ifβ= 1; (D) for anyβ.11. Suppose thatβ= 0.5 and Ann correctly anticipates her choice next week. Thenshe should finish the project (A) this week; (B) next week; (C) never; (D) not enough information. Suppose thatβ= 0.5, and Ann can commit to finish the project next week (e.g.by imposing a heavy cost on herself if the project is not finished nextweek).Then she will (A) do the project this week;(B) commit to do it next week and finish it then;(C) do it next week without commitment;(D) commit and then not finish it. Can you…
I NEED HELP WITH PART B! (a) A consumer has utility u(x,y,z) = ln(x) + 2ln(y) + 3ln(z) over the three goods, x,y and z and pz=1. Optimally she consumes 30 units of z. What is her income? How much money does she spend on x? (HINT: MUx = 1/x, MUy= 2/y, MUz = 3/z and remeber the "equivalent bang for the buck" condition). (b) Forget about (a). Suppose you have t= 29 hours in total to spend on 3 projects X,Y and Z to make some money. If you spend x hours on project X, you make 2 sqrt(x) dollars; If you spend y hours on project Y, you make 3 sqrt(y) dollars; If you spend z hours on project Z, you make 4sqrt(z) dollars; Writing down your "utility function" u(x,y,z) and the constraint, solve the utility maximization problem; what is the optimal amount of time to spend on x? on y? on z?
Let MUA = z = 10 − x and MUB = z = 21 − 2y, where z is marginal utility per dollar measured in utils, x is the amount spent on product A, and y is the amount spent on product B. Assume that the consumer has $10 to spend on A and B—that is, x + y = 10. How is the $10 best allocated between A and B? How much utility will the marginal dollar yield?
Eren’s two main hobbies are taking vacations overseas (V) and eating expensivemeals (M). His utility function is given as: U(V,M) = V2MLast year, the average price of taking a vacation overseas was US$200 and the averageprice of an expensive meal is $50. However, due to supply problems in Onions, theaverage price of an expensive meal rose to $75. The average price of a vacation did notchange. His income, which is $1500, did not change. Calculate for the equivalent variation (EV) for the price change.
A consumer has utility u(x,y,z)= ln(x) + 2ln(y) + 3ln(z) over the three goods, x,y and z and pZ = 1 . Optimally sheconsumes 30 units of z. What is her income? How much money does she spend on x?(HINT: MUX =??, MUY =??, MUZ =??and remember the “equivalent bang for the buck” condition)(b) Forget about (a). Suppose you have t = 29 hours in total to spend on 3 projects X, Y and Z to make some money.If you spend x hours on project X, you make 2√? dollars;If you spend y hours on project Y, you make ?√? dollars;If you spend z hours on project Z, you make ?√? dollars;Writing down your “utility function” u(x,y,z) and the constraint, solve the utility maximization problem; what isthe optimal amount of time to spend on x ? on y? on z ?
A consumer has preferences on Amazon original shows (x), and the composite good (y) described as u(x,y) = x2y (HINT: MUx = 2xy and MUy = x2) and she has I = $300 budget in total. Assume pY = $1, so we can think of y as the saved dollars in her pocket for other uses. Now, if she is not an amazon prime member, each show costs pX = $10, but if she is a prime member, then pX = $4. Amazon prime membership costs $120. (a) Draw her feasible budget set on the x-y axis for the no-prime-membership case, and the prime-membership case, separately. (b) If she chooses not to be a prime member, what is her optimal bundle (x,y) ?(c) If she chooses to become a prime member, what is her optimal bundle (x,y) ?(d) What is her optimal utility in (b)?in (c)? Would she want to become a prime member?
(a) A consumer has utility u(x,y,z) = ln(x) + 2ln(y) + 3ln(z) over the three goods, x,y and z and pz=1. Optimally she consumes 30 units of z. What is her income? How much money does she spend on x? (HINT: MUx = 1/x, MUy= 2/y, MUz = 3/z and remeber the "equivalent bang for the buck" condition). (b) Forget about (a). Suppose you have t= 29 hours in total to spend on 3 projects X,Y and Z to make some money. If you spend x hours on project X, you make 2 sqrt(x) dollars; If you spend y hours on project Y, you make 3 sqrt(y) dollars; If you spend z hours on project Z, you make 4sqrt(z) dollars; Writing down your "utility function" u(x,y,z) and the constraint, solve the utility maximization problem; what is the optimal amount of time to spend on x? on y? on z?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Economics 2e

Economics

ISBN:

9781947172364

Author:

Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:

OpenStax

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Principles of Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781305156050

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics 2e

Economics

ISBN:

9781947172364

Author:

Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:

OpenStax

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Principles of Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781305156050

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS