A perfectly competitive firm is considered to be more generous in terms of price and quantity of output in comparison to firm belonged to monopoly and monopolistic markets. C. If firms incurring loss in this market begin to exit the market, what will happen to the market equilibrium? Demonstrate your answer using a simplified graph. d. The firm wishes to supply output more than the quantity determined under the equilibrium condition, is it worth to pursue?

A perfectly competitive firm is considered to be more generous in terms of price and quantity of output in comparison to firm belonged to monopoly and monopolistic markets. C. If firms incurring loss in this market begin to exit the market, what will happen to the market equilibrium? Demonstrate your answer using a simplified graph. d. The firm wishes to supply output more than the quantity determined under the equilibrium condition, is it worth to pursue?

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285635101

Author:MCEACHERN

Publisher:MCEACHERN

Chapter10: Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4QFR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Continuing with the scenario in question 1, in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or film outside. As those films capture the original films profit, what will happen to the original films profit-maximizing price and output levels?
If the firms in a monopolistically competitive market are earning economic profits or losses in the short run, would you expect them to continue doing so in the long run? Why?
What is the relationship between product differentiation and monopolistic competition?
Aside from advertising, how can monopolistically competitive films increase demand for their products?
Draw a monopolists demand curve, marginal revenue, and marginal cost curves. Identify the monopolists profit-maximizing output level. Now, think about a slightly higher level of output (sayQ0+1). According to the graph, is there any consumer willing to pay more than the marginal cost of that new level of output? If so, what does this mean?
Suppose the market for Hula Hoops is monopolized by a single firm. a. Draw the initial equilibrium for such a market. b. Now suppose the demand for Hula Hoops shifts outward slightly. Show that, in general (contrary to the competitive case), it will not be possible to predict the effect of this shift in demand on the market price of Hula Hoops. c. Consider three possible ways in which the price elasticity of demand might change as the demand curve shifts: It might increase, it might decrease, or it might stay the same. Consider also that marginal costs for the monopolist might be increasing, decreasing, or constant in the range where MR=MC Consequently, there are nine different combinations of types of demand shifts and marginal cost slope configurations. Analyze each of these to determine for which it is possible to make a definite prediction about the effect of the shift in demand on the price of Hula Hoops.
Intellectual property laws are intended to promote innovation, but some economists, such as Milton Friedman, have argued that such laws are not desirable. In the United States, there is no intellectual property protection for food recipes or for fashion designs. Considering the state of these two industries, and hearing in mind the discussion of the inefficiency of monopolies, can you think of any reasons why intellectual property laws might hinder innovation in some cases?
Is a monopolistically competitive firm productively efficient? Is it allocatively efficient? Why or why not?