A researcher interested in explaining the income levels of St. Lucian workers, developed the following multiple linear regression model: INC = a+ BEDU +YEXP + STRN %3D where INC = monthly income, EDU = the number of years of formal education, EXP = the number of years of workforce experience and TRN = the number of weeks spent in job training. A sample of 35 workers was processed using MINITAB and the following is an extract of the output obtained: PredictorCoef StDev t-ratio

A researcher interested in explaining the income levels of St. Lucian workers, developed the following multiple linear regression model: INC = a+ BEDU +YEXP + STRN %3D where INC = monthly income, EDU = the number of years of formal education, EXP = the number of years of workforce experience and TRN = the number of weeks spent in job training. A sample of 35 workers was processed using MINITAB and the following is an extract of the output obtained: PredictorCoef StDev t-ratio

College Algebra

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305115545

Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson

Publisher:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson

Chapter1: Equations And Graphs

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10T: Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?
Suppose that a kitchen cabinet warehouse company would like to be able to predict the area of a customer’s kitchen using the number of cabinets and the kitchen ceiling height. To do so data is collected on the following variables from a random sample of customers: Area – area of the kitchen in square feet Height – ceiling height in the kitchen (from floor to ceiling) in inches Cabinets – number of cabinets in the kitchen Suppose that a multiple linear regression model was fit to the data and that the following output resulted: Coefficients: (Intercept)HeightCabinets Estimate-57.98771.2760.3393 Std. Error8.63820.26430.1302 t value -6.7134.8282.607 Pr(>|t|)2.75e-074.44e-050.0145 What is the predicted area of a kitchen with a height of 96 inches and 10 cabinets? Report your answer to 1 decimal place. square feet
Suppose that a kitchen cabinet warehouse company would like to be able to predict the area of a customer’s kitchen using the number of cabinets and the kitchen ceiling height. To do so data is collected on the following variables from a random sample of customers: Area – area of the kitchen in square feet Height – ceiling height in the kitchen (from floor to ceiling) in inches Cabinets – number of cabinets in the kitchen Suppose that a multiple linear regression model was fit to the data and that the following output resulted: Coefficients: (Intercept)HeightCabinets Estimate-57.98771.2760.3393 Std. Error8.63820.26430.1302 t value -6.7134.8282.607 Pr(>|t|)2.75e-074.44e-050.0145 10 Question 10 This is not a form; we suggest that you use the browse mode and read all parts of the question carefully. Which of the following is the correct interpretation of the coefficient for Cabinets? For a kitchen with a given ceiling height, the average number of cabinets…
Suppose that a kitchen cabinet warehouse company would like to be able to predict the area of a customer’s kitchen using the number of cabinets and the kitchen ceiling height. To do so data is collected on the following variables from a random sample of customers: Area – area of the kitchen in square feet Height – ceiling height in the kitchen (from floor to ceiling) in inches Cabinets – number of cabinets in the kitchen Suppose that a multiple linear regression model was fit to the data and that the following output resulted: Coefficients: (Intercept)HeightCabinets Estimate-57.98771.2760.3393 Std. Error8.63820.26430.1302 t value -6.7134.8282.607 Pr(>|t|)2.75e-074.44e-050.0145 Why is the interpretation of the constant term (i.e. "intercept") not meaningful for this example? The predicted area will be negative when the number of cabinets is zero and the height of the kitchen is also zero. But we cannot have a negative area, nor a kitchen ceiling height of 0 inches.…
A mail-order business selling personal computer supplies, software and hardware maintains a centralized warehouse. Management is currently examining the process of distribution from the warehouse and wants to study the factors that affect the warehouse distribution costs. Data collected over 24 random months contain the warehouse’s distribution cost (in thousands of Rands), the sales (in thousands of Rands) and the number of orders received. A multiple linear regression model was fitted to the data by using Stat1.2. Use the output to answer the questions that follow by typing only the letter of the correct option in the answer boxes. Variablesy: Warehouse Distribution Costx1: Salesx2: Number of Orders Model Fitting StatisticsR2 = 0.8504Adj R2: ? Regression Coefficients Beta Parameter Standard b Parameter Standard Estimates…
The issue of multicollinearity impacted the 'vadity and trustworthiness' of a regression model. demonstrate how this issue can be a problem by using an appropriate hypothetical and mathematical example.
In a laboratory experiment, data were gathered on the life span (y in months) of 33 rats, units of daily protein intake (x1), and whether or not agent x2 (a proposed life-extending agent) was added to the rats' diet (x2 = 0 if agent x2 was not added, and x2 = 1 if agent was added). From the results of the experiment, the following regression model was developed:ŷ = 36 + .8x1 − 1.7x2Also provided are SSR = 60 and SST = 180.The test statistic for testing the significance of the model is _____. a. 5.00 b. .50 c. .25 d. .33
Is there any multicollinearity problem in the above multiple regression model? How do you know? Risk of Stroke (%) Age Pressure Smoker (Yes=1) 12 57 152 0 24 67 163 0 13 58 155 0 56 86 177 1 28 59 196 0 51 76 189 0 18 56 155 1 31 78 120 0 37 80 135 1 15 78 98 0 22 71 152 0 36 70 173 1 15 67 135 1 48 77 209 0 15 60 199 0 36 82 119 1 8 66 166 0 34 80 125 1 3 62 117 0 37 59 207 1
If a scatterplot is created in excel, and a line of regression is fit along with a derived functional form, what does it mean to describe and interpret them? What conclusions would be made about relationships between two recorded variables?
A researcher notes that, in a certain region, a disproportionate number of software millionaires were born around the year 1955. Is this a coincidence, or does birth year matter when gauging whether a software founder will besuccessful? The researcher investigated this question by analyzing the data shown in the accompanying table. Complete parts a through c below. a. Find the coefficient of determination for the simple linear regression model relating number (y) of software millionaire birthdays in a decade to total number (x) of births in the region. Interpret the result. The coefficient of determination is 1.___? (Round to three decimal places as needed.) This value indicates that 2.____ of the sample variation in the number of software millionaire birthdays is explained by the linear relationship with the total number of births in the region. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) b. Find the coefficient of determination for the simple linear regression model…
Life insurance companies are keenly interested in predicting how long their customers are likely to live, because this will determine their premiums and ultimately their profitability. An Australian life insurance company is interested in the relationship, if any, between the age at death of their male customers and that of the customer’s father. Data are collected on a random sample of 100 of their male customers who have recently died. The customer’s age at death was plotted against that of their father and a linear regression model applied. Relevant output is shown below. Say how you know from the output that there actually is a significant linear relationship between a male customer’s age at death and his father’s age at death. State the value of the coefficient of Father’s Age (Death) and interpret this value in the context of the problem at hand.State the value of the coefficient of determination in the model and interpret this value in the context of the situation.
Life insurance companies are keenly interested in predicting how long their customers are likely to live, because this will determine their premiums and ultimately their profitability. An Australian life insurance company is interested in the relationship, if any, between the age at death of their male customers and that of the customer’s father. Data are collected on a random sample of 100 of their male customers who have recently died. The customer’s age at death was plotted against that of their father and a linear regression model applied. Relevant output is shown below Examine both the scatterplot and the correlation matrix provided above. Comment on the apparent relationship between the customer’s age at death and their father’s age at death in the plot. Explain how the information in the correlation matrix supports your conclusion