Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
A researcher is testing the effectiveness of an intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes and depression that focuses on increasing medication adherence compared with usual primary care. Patients randomized to the intervention group were more likely to achieve remission of depressio compared with patients in the usual care group at 12 weeks (intervention 58.7% vs usual care 30.7%, p <.001). Based on this information and the information found in table 1, how would you interpret the study findings. Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Population Characteristic Sociodemographic Usual Care (n=88) Intervention (n=92) P value

A researcher is testing the effectiveness of an intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes and depression that focuses on increasing medication adherence compared with usual primary care. Patients randomized to the intervention group were more likely to achieve remission of depressio compared with patients in the usual care group at 12 weeks (intervention 58.7% vs usual care 30.7%, p <.001). Based on this information and the information found in table 1, how would you interpret the study findings. Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Population Characteristic Sociodemographic Usual Care (n=88) Intervention (n=92) P value

Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8CR
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
A researcher is testing the effectiveness of an intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes and depression that focuses on increasing medication adherence compared with usual primary care. Patients randomized to the intervention group were more likely to achieve remission of depression compared with patients in the usual care group at 12 weeks (intervention 58.7% vs usual care 30.7%, p < .001). Based on this information and the information found in table 1, how would you interpret the study findings. Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Population Characteristic Sociodemographic Age, mean (SD) y African American, n (%) White, n (%) Hispanic, n (%) Other, n (%) Years with diabetes, mean (SD) MMSE score, mean (SD) Usual Care (n=88) 57.1 (9.6) 48 (54.5) 36 (40.9) 3 (3.4) 1 (1.1) 12.0 (11.8) 28.2 (2.3) Intervention (n=92) 57.8 (9.4) 54 (58.7) 29 (31.5) 4 (4.3) 5 (5.4) 10.5 (1.2) 28.2 (2:3) P value .63 .30 .02 ,99 4 TRA 1
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher is testing the effectiveness of an intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes and depression that focuses on increasing medication adherence compared with usual primary care. Patients randomized to the intervention group were more likely to achieve remission of depression compared with patients in the usual care group at 12 weeks (intervention 58.7% vs usual care 30.7%, p < .001). Based on this information and the information found in table 1, how would you interpret the study findings. Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Population Characteristic Sociodemographic Age, mean (SD) y African American, n (%) White, n (%) Hispanic, n (%) Other, n (%) Years with diabetes, mean (SD) MMSE score, mean (SD) Usual Care (n=88) 57.1 (9.6) 48 (54.5) 36 (40.9) 3 (3.4) 1 (1.1) 12.0 (11.8) 28.2 (2.3) Intervention (n=92) 57.8 (9.4) 54 (58.7) 29 (31.5) 4 (4.3) 5 (5.4) 10.5 (1.2) 28.2 (2:3) P value .63 .30 .02 ,99 4 TRA 1
The results suggest that the intervention was effective for those who had diabetes for a shorter period of time, but made no difference based on age, race and cognition. The results demonstrate the intervention was not effective and provide the same benefit of usual care. The results are favorable for the intervention however because there are differences in the length of time those studied had been diagnosed with diabetes, there may be other factors that led to the demonstrated intervention effect. The results indicate the intervention was effective as described above and the information in the table shows how the intervention was effective across the groups.
Transcribed Image Text:The results suggest that the intervention was effective for those who had diabetes for a shorter period of time, but made no difference based on age, race and cognition. The results demonstrate the intervention was not effective and provide the same benefit of usual care. The results are favorable for the intervention however because there are differences in the length of time those studied had been diagnosed with diabetes, there may be other factors that led to the demonstrated intervention effect. The results indicate the intervention was effective as described above and the information in the table shows how the intervention was effective across the groups.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS