A small manufacturer has won a major contract with the Oman Defence Force to develop a new generation of satellite phone for battlefield applications. Because of the significant technological challenges involved in this project and the company's own size limitations and lack of experience in dealing with the army on these kinds of contracts, the company has decided to partner with another firm in order to collaborate on developing the technology. This decision would be an example of what kind of response to the risk? of Select one: O Transfer it. O Avoid it. Accept it Share it. Minimize it.

A small manufacturer has won a major contract with the Oman Defence Force to develop a new generation of satellite phone for battlefield applications. Because of the significant technological challenges involved in this project and the company's own size limitations and lack of experience in dealing with the army on these kinds of contracts, the company has decided to partner with another firm in order to collaborate on developing the technology. This decision would be an example of what kind of response to the risk? of Select one: O Transfer it. O Avoid it. Accept it Share it. Minimize it.

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.1SA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
A company is introducing reusable straws in the market on the 1st of January 2022. They estimate the total market for reusable straws is approximately 3 million per year. The company expects to sell 500000 straws in the first year. There is a competitor already in the market whose sales per year is 1 million straws per year. Your group have been hired as consultants to answer the following questions: Q1- The company is building a facility to produce 1 million straws per year. Is this capacity just right, too little or too much? What factors will you consider in building capacities? Should they adopt a a) leading strategy b) lag strategy or c) straddle strategy to build further capacities. Please justify.
Read and analyze the following article. Manila Bay Beach Nourishment Project After years of being known for its polluted waters, Manila Bay suddenly got a facelift as the government decided to take a big risk by overlaying mounds of artificial white sand (dolomite) on a part of the bay's naturally gray shoreline. This project, which is spearheaded by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), was instantly met with harsh disapproval. In September, the overlaying of the dolomite in Manila Bay beach or the beach nourishment project caught public attention, stirring curiosity and setting off waves of people flocking to the area to get a glimpse of the "white sands". Many criticized the project, throwing allegations at the DENR, calling the project a health hazard and a waste of public funds. But the DENR emphasized that the beach nourishment with the use of dolomite is a significant component of the rehabilitation aimed to protect the coastal resources in the area and…
One of the firm’s audit partners, Alice Goodwin, justhad lunch with a good friend, Sara Hitchcock, who is president of Granger ContainerCorporation. Granger Container Corp. is a fast-growing company that has been in businessfor only a few years. During lunch, Sara asked Alice for some advice and direction on howGranger Container should structure its systems development process within the InformationSystems Department. Sara noted that because Granger has experienced such tremendousgrowth, the systems development process has evolved into its current state without muchdirection. Given Granger Container’s current size, Sara questions whether their currentprocesses are reasonable. Sara’s concern is magnified by the fact that she has little understanding of information systems processes. Alice told Sara about your information systemsevaluation experience and agreed to have you look at Granger Container’s current systemsdevelopment procedures. Sara gave Alice the following summary of the…
You have two design options for your new line of high-resolution monitors for Computer-Aided Design (CAD)workstations. The production run is for 110,000 units. Design option A has a .90 probability of yielding 65good monitors per 100 and a .10 probability of yielding 70good monitors per 100. This design will cost $1,000,000. Design option B has a .80 probability of yielding 65good units per 100 and a .20 probability of yielding 60good units per 100. This design will cost $1,350,000. Good or bad, each monitor will cost $75. Each good monitor will sell for $150. Bad monitors are destroyed and have no salvage value. We ignore any disposal costs in this problem. Demonstrate how decision trees can be used in order to choose the design option based on the above situation. Calculate the expected monetary value (EMV) of each option and determine which option you will propose.
A company is introducing reusable straws in the Canadian market on 1st of January 2022. They estimate the total market for reusable straws in Canada is approximately 3 million per year. The company expects to sell 500000 straws in the first year. There is a competitor already in the market whose sales per year is 1 million straws per year. Your group have been hired as consultants to answer the following questions: Q 1-The company is building a facility to produce 1 million straws per year. Is this capacity just right, too little or too much? What factors will you consider in building capacities? Should they adopt a a) leading strategy b) lag strategy or c) straddle strategy to build further capacities. Please justify. Q-2The company also wants you to recommend an aggregate planning strategy. They have provided you with the following information. Month Expected Demand Production Days January 2022 35000 22 February 2022 30000 18 March 37000 22 April…
Mont Corp produces and sells 1,000 dining tables per year. Currently its only quality problem with the products is related to varnishing. It currently incurs $400 per year for quality training and $600 per year for reliability engineering. Inspection cost is $6 per unit, and all units produced are inspected. Traditionally, at an internal inspection, 9% of all units fully-produced are found to have problems with the varnishing, and are reworked. Rework cost is $100 per unit. Defective units sold to customers are returned to the company and reworked. External failures are 1% of units sold, and the company incurs the shipping costs at the rate of $20 per unit. In 2020, management are considering an alternative method of inspecting products which will reduce inspection cost by $1.50 per unit. The alternative method will reduce the internal failure to 4% of all units produced, and increase the external failure rate to 6% of all units sold. In addition, with the alternative inspection…
CEO John Spychalski is concerned about a problem that has existed at CBN railroad for almost 20 years now. The continuous problem has been that the locomotives used by the company are not very reliable. Even with prior decisions to resolve the problem, there still has not been a change in the reliability of these locomotives. Between 2013 and 2014, 155 new locomotives were purchased and one of CBN's repair shops was reno- vated. The renovated shop has been very inefficient. Spychalski estimated that the shop would complete 300 overhauls on a yearly basis, but instead it has only managed to com- plete an average of 160 overhauls per year. The company has also been doing a poor job servicing customers (that is, providing equipment). CBN has averaged only 87 to 88 percent equipment availability, compared to other railroads with availability figures greater than 90 percent. Increased business in the rail industry has been a reason for trying to reduce the time used for repairing the…
*THE TABLE RELATED TO THIS QUESTION IS ATTACHED* Thank you! The Mid-West Enterprises currently sells a product consisting of three components arranged in series (i. e., all three components needs to be working in good condition) with the reliability of each component as shown in Figure 1 below. However, they want to improve the reliability of their product and are considering two alternate designs that mix the series-parallel configurations with the reliability of each component shown in Figures 2 and 3 below. Ignoring the cost and all other aspects, the management of Mid-West Enterprises has asked you to analyze each design option. Therefore, please answer the following questions clearly stating the logic and calculations needed. What is the reliability of each design in Figures 1 through 3 above?
Howard Weiss, Inc., is considering building a sensitive new radiation scanning device. His managers believe that there is aprobability of .35 that the ATR Co. will come out with a competitive product. If Weiss adds an assembly line for the product and ATR Co. does not follow with a competitive product, Weiss's expected profit is $40,000 ; if Weiss adds an assembly line and ATR follows suit, Weiss still expects $20,000 profit. If Weiss adds a new plant addition and ATR does not produce a competitive product, Weiss expects a profit of $600,000 ; if ATR does compete for this market, Weiss expects a loss of $120,000.Part 2a) Expected value for the option = $ b)Expected value for the build new plant option = c) The alternative that provides Weiss the…