Assuming that the probability of engine malfunction of the MH 370 flight was determined to be 25%, the potential impact of any risk event occurring was rated to be 3 and the difficulty with detecting this malfunction was 5. As the risk engineer overseeing the installation, calculate the risk value, using FMEA. Select one: O a. 3.75 O b. 62.5 O c. 375 O d. 6.25

Assuming that the probability of engine malfunction of the MH 370 flight was determined to be 25%, the potential impact of any risk event occurring was rated to be 3 and the difficulty with detecting this malfunction was 5. As the risk engineer overseeing the installation, calculate the risk value, using FMEA. Select one: O a. 3.75 O b. 62.5 O c. 375 O d. 6.25

Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Series)

4th Edition

ISBN:9781305970663

Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Publisher:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Chapter14: Quality And Environmental Cost Management

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 27E: Using the Taguchi quality loss function, an average loss of 20 per unit is calculated. During the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

According to the risk management process in ISO 31000, which of the following is a necessary step in risk assessment? Select one: A. Risk treatment B. Risk transfer C. Risk analysis D. Risk minimisation #### i want answer within one hour,Thanks
Assume that the chance of loss is 3 percent for two different fleets of trucks. Explain how it is possible that objective risk for both fleets can be different even though the chance of loss is identical.
true or false Having 10,000 exposure units as compared to 1,000,000 exposure units will enable the future loss experience can be predicted more accurately. Risk-taking individuals tend to perceive higher risk inherent in a given activity relative to risk-averse individuals Risk-taking individuals prefer high return and they are willing to assume much higher level of risk. The 20% ruling of UUM allowing students to be absent from class, requiring only 80% class attendance for students to be eligible to sit for final exam is an example of legal hazard.
Ned Thompson Labs performs tests on superalloys, titanium, aluminum, and most metals. Tests on metal composites that rely upon scanning electron microscope results can be subcontracted or the labs can purchase new equipment. Evaluate the sensitivity of the economic decision to purchase the equipment over a range of ±20% (in 10% increments)of the estimates for P, AOC, R, n, and MARR (range on MARR is 12% to 18%). Use the AW method and plot the results on a sensitivity graph. For which parameter(s) is the AW most sensitive? least sensitive? First cost, P = $-180,000 Salvage, S = $20,000 Life, n = 10 years Annual operating cost, AOC=$-30,000 per year Annual revenue, R = $70,000 per year MARR = 15% per year
CyberBest started to develop an anti-malware application on August 1, 20X1. It reached technological feasibility on March 1, 20X2, and the application was released on April 30, 20X2. Below are costs to develop the application. August 1 through December 31, 20X1 $5,000,000 January 1 through February 28, 20X2 1,600,000 March 1 through April 30, 20X2 1,800,000 Determine the amount of asset and the amount of R&D expenses relating to the development of this anti-malware application. $1,800,000 asset, and $6,600,000 R&D expenses $5,000,000 asset, and $3,400,000 R&D expenses $6,600,000 asset, and $1,800,000 R&D expenses $3,400,000 asset, and $5,000,000 R&D expenses
I need some opinions/thoughts on this... A non-destructive test program for an aircraft engine compressor blade made of Ti-6AL-4V titanium alloy can ensure that no flaw greater than 2 mm will exist in the finished part. a) Can this inspection program prevent the occurrence of fast fracture/catastrophic failure? b) Why? I say no, because the test itself can only test the surface and internals of the object but can not ensure: Components needing to be cleaned before and after inspection Sensitivity of inspection can sometimes be affected by the finish of a component. Sometimes there might be a lack of depth sizing On some non-destructive test methods, only relatively non-porous surfaces can be inspected Some test methods require electricity Some can also be affected by variations in magnetic permeability Some tests are only effective on materials that are conductive
Using the Taguchi quality loss function, an average loss of 20 per unit is calculated. During the year, 25,000 units were produced. Which of the following statements represents the correct application of the Taguchi loss function? a. The hidden costs of internal failure are 500,000. b. The hidden costs of external failure are 500,000. c. The costs of detection activities are 20 per unit inspected. d. The total external costs are 500,000.
On September 30, 2018, Athens Software began developing a software program to shield personal computersfrom malware and spyware. Technological feasibility was established on February 28, 2019, and the program wasavailable for release on April 30, 2019. Development costs were incurred as follows:September 30 through December 31, 2018 $2,200,000January 1 through February 28, 2019 800,000March 1 through April 30, 2019 400,000Athens expects a useful life of four years for the software and total revenues of $5,000,000 during that time.During 2019, revenue of $1,000,000 was recognized.Required:1. Prepare the journal entries to record the development costs in 2018 and 2019.2. Calculate the required amortization for 2019.
Refer to the XYZ Company example in the chapter and the results in Panels A and B of Exhibit 12.7. On the basis of this information, management of the company has decided to delay the implementation of the project for 1 year. Those managers are now interested in knowing how sensitive this decision is with respect to the assumptions they’ve made regarding the basic analysis. Therefore, they have asked you to prepare some supplementary analyses regarding Panel B of Exhibit 12.7. Required: 1. Holding everything else constant, what is the expected NPV of the decision if the probabilities for the three scenarios are as follows: high (20%), medium (47%), and low (33%)? 2. Holding everything else constant, what is the expected NPV of the decision if the probabilities for the three scenarios are as follows: high (24%), medium (43%), and low (33%)? 3. Prepare a 5 × 3 table containing the estimated NPV of the decision to delay for each combination of the following: risk-free rate of interest…
he chart below contains a description of Jack Company's top risk, an inherent risk assessment, three risk response alternatives, and a residual risk assessment for each response alternative. Also, Jack's management accountant estimates that the incremental cost of implementing risk response A is $2,600,000 and the incremental cost of implementing risk response B is $1,000,000. Risk Inherent Risk Residual Risk Likelihood Impact (on operating costs) Risk Response Alternatives Likelihood Impact (on operating costs) Lose top employee talent to competitors 50% $10,000,000 A: Improve Jack's employee training program 40% $3,000,000 B: Improve Jack's employee compensation and benefits package 20% $8,000,000 C: Take no action 50% $10,000,000 The residual risk for Jack Company associated with risk response alternative B is: a.$5,000,000. b.$1,000,000. c.$1,600,000 d.$3,200,000.
Eradicate Now’ is an extermination company that specializes in pest control. OnSeptember 19, 2020, the company was identified as being potentially responsible forcausing serious damages to the environment by the Environmental Regulatory Agency.The company’s management team met with it’s lawyers and concluded that it is probablethat it will be held responsible for the damages caused. A reasonable estimate of thedamages was $2,000,000.‘Eradicate Now’ has an insurance policy of $10,000,000 with a deductible clause of$300,000.RequiredHow should ‘Eradicate Now’ report this information on its financial statements for theyear ended December 31, 2020?
The production department is proposing the purchase of an automatic insertion machine. It has identified three machines and has asked the accountant to analyze them to determine which one has the best average rate of return. Machine A Machine B Machine C Estimated average income $45,593.52 $70,301.40 $72,086.10 Average investment 325,668.00 234,338.00 480,574.00