Consider two competitive economies that have the same quantities of labor (L = 400) and capital (K = 400), and the same technology (A = 100). The economies of the countries are described by the following Cobb–Douglas production functions: North Economy: Y = A L.3K.7 South Economy: Y = A L.7K.3 In which economy is labor's share of income larger? Explain

Consider two competitive economies that have the same quantities of labor (L = 400) and capital (K = 400), and the same technology (A = 100). The economies of the countries are described by the following Cobb–Douglas production functions: North Economy: Y = A L.3K.7 South Economy: Y = A L.7K.3 In which economy is labor's share of income larger? Explain

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter13: General Equilibrium And Welfare

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13.6P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two competitive economies that have the same quantities of labor (L = 400) and capital (K = 400), and the same technology (A = 100). The economies of the countries are described by the following Cobb–Douglas production functions: North Economy: Y = A L.3K.7 South Economy: Y = A L.7K.3 Which economy has the larger total production? Explain.
The table below shows the number of labor minutes it takes for each employee to produce one pizza and one salad. Compare all 3 employees to one another and determine which one of the following statements is true? Select one: a. Carter has a comparative advantage in making Salad b. Carter has an absolute advantage in both products c. Melanie has a comparative advantage in making Pizza d. Jackson has a comparative advantage in making Salad e. Melanie has a comparative advantage in making Salad f. Jackson has an absolute advantage in both products g. Carter has a comparative advantage in making Pizza
Suppose there exist two imaginary countries, Congaree and Yosemite. Their labor forces are each capable of supplying four million hours per week that can be used to produce almonds, shorts, or some combination of the two. The following table shows the amount of almonds or shorts that can be produced by one hour of labor.
Suppose you have a team of two workers: one is a baker and one is a chef. Your baker is talented but is inexperienced. Your chef is not only an elite chef but is also faster at baking. If your kitchen specialized according to absolute advantage, who would do the cooking? Who would do the baking? If your kitchen specialized according to comparative advantage, who would do the cooking? Who would do the baking? Which approach above is more efficient? Explain your answer.
Q82 One region has an absolute advantage over another region in the production of good X when... a. The first region has a larger supply of the raw materials required to produce good X. b. An equal quantity of resources can produce more of good X in the first region than in the second region. c. The opportunity cost of one unit of X is lower in the first region than in the second region. d. The first region has a more productive labour force than the second. e. There is no demand for good X in the second region
During the last 20 to 30 years, there have been a number of countries whose economies have experienced important economic expansion and development. One group of countries has been labeled the BRIC countries and the other the VISTA countries. Identify each of the nine countries and provide some insights about their economies and economic importance. The theories of absolute and comparative advantage have been offered as an economic rationale for trade between and among regions and countries. Compare and contrast the two concepts. Which of the two do you think is more important for explaining the growth in global trade during the last 25 years? Why”
Let suppose in the world there is two country, Country X and Country Y. In country X there is only one worker A while on country Y the worker is B. And both can produce sugar and wheat. But the country B is specialized in producing wheat and the other one in sugar. Suppose that the A and the B each work 40 hours a week and can devote this time to growing sugar, raising wheat, or a combination of the both. The person A can produce a pound of sugar in 10 hours and a pound of wheat in 20 hours. The B, who is more productive in both activities, can produce a pound of Sugar in 8 hours and a pound of meat in 1 hour. (a) Draw the Production Possibilities Frontiers for both workers? (b) Whose have absolute and comparative advantage? (c) Why they move toward trade? (d) Graphically shows the gain from trade.
"The Heckscher-Ohlin Model suggests that the basis of comparative advantage lies primarily in a difference in factor endowments between countries, and that if countries enter into international trade based on that comparative advantage, they will be better off compared to other theories." Discuss this statement
Nation alpha can produce either 3 units of good X or 1 unit of good Y with 1 hour of labour whereas nation beta can produce either 4 units of good X or 2 units of good Y with one hour of labor . Assuming that labor is the only input then ?
Consider a specific-factors model where two Countries, Denmark and Tanzania, use labor to produce cake (C) and helicopters (H). However, arable land (A) are a factor specific to cake, and jerrycans (J) are a factor specific to helicopters. Suppose that Tanzania has L = 100 workers, J = 40 jerrycans, and A = 1000 arable land. The production functions and marginal products of labor for cake and helicopters are: C = 4 x Lc0.5 x A0.5 MPLc = 2 x Lc-0.5 x A0.5 H = 4 x LH0.5 x J0.5 MPLH = 2 x LH-0.5 x J0.5 In Tanzania, the price of crystals is 20 and the price of hyperdrives is 200. In this case, the wage rate will be ________ and ________ workers will be employed in the cake industry and __________ workers will be employed in the helicopter industry.
Using a production possibilities frontier determine how does a country's PPF change in response to the events described below. Make sure to explicit what sectors are you representing and what sort of assumption each event implies (neutral effect vs a sector biased effect). The latter follows from your assumptions on the factor intensity of the sector you are representing. 1.reducing import taxes (tariffs)on primary inputs 2.increasing the expenditure on research and development 3.the introduction of greater flexibility in labour markets(new government laws enabling easier hiring of workers) 4.increasing skilled migration into a country 5.the discovery of new mineral deposits in a country.
Assume there are two countries, Argentina and Brazil, which produce two goods, corn and wine. Assume that land is specific to corn, capital is specific to wine, and labor is free to move between the two industries. Assume that Brazil has a comparative advantage in corn, and Argentina has a comparative in wine. Brazil and Argentina sign a free trade agreement, and we want to study the consequences of this trade agreement.