Firm112Initial Pollution Level3100200$20$40Above is tabulated the pollution level in tons for three different manufacturing firms, as well as their cost per ton of reducing pollution. The government has decided to limit total pollution to 300 tons, anddistribute to each firm 100 permits, each allowing the firm to emit 1 ton of the pollutant. By how much would the total cost of the pollution reduction initiative be reduced if the firms are allowed to tradetheir permits, as opposed to not letting them trade them?Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 Unit$10300

Pollution permits are regulated allowances that allow producers to generate pollution. Tradable…

Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 Unit $10 $20 $40 ove is tabulated the pollution level in tons for three different manufacturing firms, as well as their cost per ton of reducing pollution. The government decided to limit total pollution to 300 tons, and tribute to each firm 100 permits, each allowing the firm to emit 1 ton of the pollutant. By how much would the total cost of the pollution reduction initiative be reduced if the firms are allowed to trade eir permits, as opposed to not letting them trade them? Firm 1 2 Initial Pollution Level 100 200 300

Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 Unit $10 $20 $40 ove is tabulated the pollution level in tons for three different manufacturing firms, as well as their cost per ton of reducing pollution. The government decided to limit total pollution to 300 tons, and tribute to each firm 100 permits, each allowing the firm to emit 1 ton of the pollutant. By how much would the total cost of the pollution reduction initiative be reduced if the firms are allowed to trade eir permits, as opposed to not letting them trade them? Firm 1 2 Initial Pollution Level 100 200 300

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter14: Environmental Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created by low-income countries?
Is zero pollution possible under a marketable permits system? Why or why not?
Consider two ways of protecting elephants from poachers in African countries. In one approach, the government sets up enormous national parks that have sufficient habitat for elephants to thrive and forbids all local people to enter the parks or to injure either the elephants or their habitat in any way. In a second approach, the government sets up national parks and designates 10 villages around the edges of the park as official tourist centers that become places where tourists can stay and bases for guided tours inside the national park. Consider the different incentives of local villagers-who often are very poor-in each of these plans. Which plan seems more likely to help the elephant population?
Will a system of marketable permits work with thousands of films? Why or why not?
Radio stations, tornado sirens, light houses, and street lights are all public goods in that all are nonrivalrous and nonexclusionary. Therefore why does the government provide tornado sirens, street lights and light houses but not radio stations (other than PBS stations)?
What is an externality?
Assume that the marginal private costs of a film producing fuel-efficient can; is greater than the marginal social costs. Assume that the marginal private benefits of a firm producing fuel efficient cars are the same as the marginal social benefits. Discuss one wags.r that the government cans ï¬‚y to increase production and sales of fuel efficient cars to the socially desirable amount. Hint: the government is flying to affect production through costs, net benefits.
What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?
A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals to clear some of Sherwoods forest and grow com, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. Table 12.11 shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why? In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?
Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Way or why not?
As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect the marginal benefits of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not?
Please helo me with this question There are 50 residents that live in a small town in California. Each resident uses electricity and there is one power station that produces electricity for the residents from coal. Each residents' demand for electricity is Q = 10 - 2P and the supply function for the power plant is Q = 150P. For each unit of electricity that the power station produces, there is a corresponding release of pollution that leads to asthma and other health problems for the 50 residents. The marginal damage of each unit of electricity produced, per person, is $.05. a. What is the market equilibrium price and quantity per unit of electricity? b. What is the efficient Pigouvian tax per unit of pollution? c. The government of this small California town decides to impose the efficient Pigouvian per unit tax on the power station. What is the new social optimum price and quantity per unit of electricity? d. What is the government tax revenue? e. What is the gain in total…