Critically analyse how competitive forces in the industry have shaped Foschini Group (TFG) strategy. One of South Africa's biggest retailers has major plans to create jobs and open new storesSALEup to50%OFFOSCHINIListed retailer The Foschini Group (TFG) says that the final Competition Commission approval for itsacquisition of Tapestry Home Brands will allow it to apply its localisation strategy to furnituremanufacturing, with significant job-creation and supply chain multipliers for the country. The TapestryHome Brands Group is a retailer of furniture, linen, fabrics, and home decor through its trading brands-Dial-a-Bed, Volpes, Coricraft & The Bed Store. With the acquisition concluded, TFG said it is alreadyexploring opportunities to further expand Tapestry's manufacturing capabilities in furniture, bedding,and home textiles to supply TFG's homeware brands, particularly @home, with a view to substitutingproducts that are currently imported with locally made goods."In all three of the Tapestry factories, we plan to further support their own manufacturing demand aswell as increase production to cater for the ongoing growth of TFG's existing homeware businesses.With some modest capital expenditure investments into these manufacturing facilities, we willsignificantly expand their capacity to cater for this increased demand," said TFG CEO AnthonyThunström. "As with the local manufacture of apparel, we expect to realise similar commercialbenefits from local production of homeware such as sofas, linen, and beds, including improved cashflow and reduced inventory holding requirements, while avoiding global supply chain disruptions andelevated freight costs. We will build on Tapestry's established vertically integrated, direct-to-consumer business model as we unlock synergies with the TFG businesses, Thunström said.TFG said it has also committed in its agreement with the Competition Commission to open a minimumof 35 new stores within three years under the four Tapestry brands - Coricraft, Dial-a-Bed, The BedStore and Volpes. "We expect to comfortably overshoot this target as we bring TFG's scale andresources to bear on growing the Tapestry businesses, and we have already identified the need for anadditional 17 stores for Volpes alone," said Shani Naidoo, TFG Group director for the HomewareDivision. "As an example of the kind of impact TFG has on businesses it has acquired, we have grownemployment at Cotton Traders, the manufacturing arm of the Granny Goose business, by 20% within3less than a year since we bought that company and half of its production is now going into TFG stores.The factory is running at full capacity, and we are planning a R20 million investment in expanding thefactory," Naidoo said."By expanding the same vertical integration model which has been so successful in our apparelbusiness to our Home Division, TFG is well set following the Tapestry acquisition to reindustrialise thehomeware manufacturing sector in South Africa and grow local skills and employment,"Thunström. TFG already sources 73% of apparel locally, and its intention is to bring more furnitureproduction into South Africa as well."Current plans for expanding our local clothing manufacturing capability and building out our storefootprint entail the creation of at least 10,000 new employment opportunities up to 2026, beforeconsidering our growth plans for the Tapestry brands," said Thunström. TFG said it expects to doubleits own local, quick response clothing production from 15 million units in FY22 to 31 million units byFY26. This is on top of the locally manufactured apparel that the group already sources. "At the sametime, we are supporting reindustrialisation, skills development, and employment creation through ourparticipation in the government's master plan for Retail Clothing, Textile, Footwear and Leather."Significantly, TFG will also lift wages for more than 10 000 of our customer-facing employees to 7%above the sectoral determined minimum," Thunström said. "This is a significant step in our investmentbehind fair and responsible pay and one that the group will continue to improve over time. It alsoforms part of a broader package of initiatives aimed at improving employee pay and benefits."the apparel front, TFG has committed to developing several manufacturing business units in thecurrent year, consisting of adding jobs within our own factories as well as within our strategic supplierswho largely produce exclusively for TFG."For each one million units of quick response apparel, we need two more MBUS, each withapproximately 200 employees, producing an average of 4,200 units a day for 247 days a year.Ultimately, we need the equivalent of 30 MBUS to achieve the FY26 local manufacture target of 31million units," said TFG's Merchandise and Supply Chain MD, Graham Choice. "This will generate morethan 1,820 new employment opportunities in our own factories and another 4,190 in those of ourstrategic suppliers, for a total of more than 6,000 new employment opportunities in clothingmanufacture alone."TFG said its growth plans in manufacturing are mirrored by an equally aggressive expansion in its storefootprint. Work is already underway to build out 342 stores, representing more than 92,000m2 of newretail space. With R600 million in capex already committed to this work, TFG said it could spend asmuch as R1 billion depending on continuing site identification, with an expected bump in revenue ofabout R3.8 billion. With an average of six employees per outlet, the store expansion initiative can beexpected to generate more than 2,100 new employment opportunities.

INTRODUCTION: Competitor analysis can help us to: - Understand own company's place in the market. -…

Answered: Critically analyse how competitive…

Business

Management

Critically analyse how competitive forces in the industry have shaped Foschini Group (TFG) strategy.

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.7A: Avion, Inc. Susan Dey and Bill Mifflin, procurement managers at Avion, Inc., sat across from each...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Avion, Inc. Susan Dey and Bill Mifflin, procurement managers at Avion, Inc., sat across from each other and reviewed a troubling performance report concerning a key supplier, Foster Technologies. The report detailed the deteriorating performance of Foster Technologies in the areas of material quality and on-time delivery. At this point, Kevin ODonnell, another procurement manager, entered the room. Why can changes within a supply chain disrupt the normal flow of goods and services within a supply chain?
The Global Sourcing Wire Harness Decision Sheila Austin, a buyer at Autolink, a Detroit-based producer of subassemblies for the automotive market, has sent out requests for quotations for a wiring harness to four prospective suppliers. Only two of the four suppliers indicated an interest in quoting the business: Original Wire (Auburn Hills, MI) and Happy Lucky Assemblies (HLA) of Guangdong Province, China. The estimated demand for the harnesses is 5,000 units a month. Both suppliers will incur some costs to retool for this particular harness. The harnesses will be prepackaged in 24 12 6-inch cartons. Each packaged unit weighs approximately 10 pounds. Quote 1 The first quote received is from Original Wire. Auburn Hills is about 20 miles from Autolinks corporate headquarters, so the quote was delivered in person. When Sheila went down to the lobby, she was greeted by the sales agent and an engineering representative. After the quote was handed over, the sales agent noted that engineering would be happy to work closely with Autolink in developing the unit and would also be interested in future business that might involve finding ways to reduce costs. The sales agent also noted that they were hungry for business, as they were losing a lot of customers to companies from China. The quote included unit price, tooling, and packaging. The quoted unit price does not include shipping costs. Original Wire requires no special warehousing of inventory, and daily deliveries from its manufacturing site directly to Autolinks assembly operations are possible. Original Wire Quote: Unit price = 30 Packing costs = 0.75 per unit Tooling = 6,000 one-time fixed charge Freight cost = 5.20 per hundred pounds Quote 2 The second quote received is from Happy Lucky Assemblies of Guangdong Province, China. The supplier must pack the harnesses in a container and ship via inland transportation to the port of Shanghai in China, have the shipment transferred to a container ship, ship material to Seattle, and then have material transported inland to Detroit. The quoted unit price does not include international shipping costs, which the buyer will assume. HLA Quote: Unit price = 19.50 Shipping lead time = Eight weeks Tooling = 3,000 In addition to the suppliers quote, Sheila must consider additional costs and information before preparing a comparison of the Chinese suppliers quotation: Each monthly shipment requires three 40-foot containers. Packing costs for containerization = 2 per unit. Cost of inland transportation to port of export = 200 per container. Freight forwarders fee = 100 per shipment (letter of credit, documentation, etc.). Cost of ocean transport = 4,000 per container. This has risen significantly in recent years due to a shortage of ocean freight capacity. Marine insurance = 0.50 per 100 of shipment. U.S. port handling charges = 1,200 per container. This fee has also risen considerably this year, due to increased security. Ports have also been complaining that the charges may increase in the future. Customs duty = 5% of unit cost. Customs broker fees per shipment = 300. Transportation from Seattle to Detroit = 18.60 per hundred pounds. Need to warehouse at least four weeks of inventory in Detroit at a warehousing cost of 1.00 per cubic foot per month, to compensate for lead time uncertainty. Sheila must also figure the costs associated with committing corporate capital for holding inventory. She has spoken to some accountants, who typically use a corporate cost of capital rate of 15%. Cost of hedging currencybroker fees = 400 per shipment Additional administrative time due to international shipping = 4 hours per shipment 25 per hour (estimated) At least two five-day visits per year to travel to China to meet with supplier and provide updates on performance and shipping = 20,000 per year (estimated) The international sourcing costs must be absorbed by Sheila, as the supplier does not assume any of the additional estimated costs and invoice Sheila later, or build the costs into a revised unit price. Sheila feels that the U.S. supplier is probably less expensive, even though it quoted a higher price. Sheila also knows that this is a standard technology that is unlikely to change during the next three years, but which could be a contract that extends multiple years out. There is also a lot of hall talk amongst the engineers on her floor about next-generation automotive electronics, which will completely eliminate the need for wire harnesses, which will be replaced by electronic components that are smaller, lighter, and more reliable. She is unsure about how to calculate the total costs for each option, and she is even more unsure about how to factor these other variables into the decision. Based on this case, do you think international purchasing is more or less complex than domestic purchasing? Why? Is it worth the additional effort?
The Global Sourcing Wire Harness Decision Sheila Austin, a buyer at Autolink, a Detroit-based producer of subassemblies for the automotive market, has sent out requests for quotations for a wiring harness to four prospective suppliers. Only two of the four suppliers indicated an interest in quoting the business: Original Wire (Auburn Hills, MI) and Happy Lucky Assemblies (HLA) of Guangdong Province, China. The estimated demand for the harnesses is 5,000 units a month. Both suppliers will incur some costs to retool for this particular harness. The harnesses will be prepackaged in 24 12 6-inch cartons. Each packaged unit weighs approximately 10 pounds. Quote 1 The first quote received is from Original Wire. Auburn Hills is about 20 miles from Autolinks corporate headquarters, so the quote was delivered in person. When Sheila went down to the lobby, she was greeted by the sales agent and an engineering representative. After the quote was handed over, the sales agent noted that engineering would be happy to work closely with Autolink in developing the unit and would also be interested in future business that might involve finding ways to reduce costs. The sales agent also noted that they were hungry for business, as they were losing a lot of customers to companies from China. The quote included unit price, tooling, and packaging. The quoted unit price does not include shipping costs. Original Wire requires no special warehousing of inventory, and daily deliveries from its manufacturing site directly to Autolinks assembly operations are possible. Original Wire Quote: Unit price = 30 Packing costs = 0.75 per unit Tooling = 6,000 one-time fixed charge Freight cost = 5.20 per hundred pounds Quote 2 The second quote received is from Happy Lucky Assemblies of Guangdong Province, China. The supplier must pack the harnesses in a container and ship via inland transportation to the port of Shanghai in China, have the shipment transferred to a container ship, ship material to Seattle, and then have material transported inland to Detroit. The quoted unit price does not include international shipping costs, which the buyer will assume. HLA Quote: Unit price = 19.50 Shipping lead time = Eight weeks Tooling = 3,000 In addition to the suppliers quote, Sheila must consider additional costs and information before preparing a comparison of the Chinese suppliers quotation: Each monthly shipment requires three 40-foot containers. Packing costs for containerization = 2 per unit. Cost of inland transportation to port of export = 200 per container. Freight forwarders fee = 100 per shipment (letter of credit, documentation, etc.). Cost of ocean transport = 4,000 per container. This has risen significantly in recent years due to a shortage of ocean freight capacity. Marine insurance = 0.50 per 100 of shipment. U.S. port handling charges = 1,200 per container. This fee has also risen considerably this year, due to increased security. Ports have also been complaining that the charges may increase in the future. Customs duty = 5% of unit cost. Customs broker fees per shipment = 300. Transportation from Seattle to Detroit = 18.60 per hundred pounds. Need to warehouse at least four weeks of inventory in Detroit at a warehousing cost of 1.00 per cubic foot per month, to compensate for lead time uncertainty. Sheila must also figure the costs associated with committing corporate capital for holding inventory. She has spoken to some accountants, who typically use a corporate cost of capital rate of 15%. Cost of hedging currencybroker fees = 400 per shipment Additional administrative time due to international shipping = 4 hours per shipment 25 per hour (estimated) At least two five-day visits per year to travel to China to meet with supplier and provide updates on performance and shipping = 20,000 per year (estimated) The international sourcing costs must be absorbed by Sheila, as the supplier does not assume any of the additional estimated costs and invoice Sheila later, or build the costs into a revised unit price. Sheila feels that the U.S. supplier is probably less expensive, even though it quoted a higher price. Sheila also knows that this is a standard technology that is unlikely to change during the next three years, but which could be a contract that extends multiple years out. There is also a lot of hall talk amongst the engineers on her floor about next-generation automotive electronics, which will completely eliminate the need for wire harnesses, which will be replaced by electronic components that are smaller, lighter, and more reliable. She is unsure about how to calculate the total costs for each option, and she is even more unsure about how to factor these other variables into the decision. Calculate the total cost per unit of purchasing from Original Wire.
The Global Sourcing Wire Harness Decision Sheila Austin, a buyer at Autolink, a Detroit-based producer of subassemblies for the automotive market, has sent out requests for quotations for a wiring harness to four prospective suppliers. Only two of the four suppliers indicated an interest in quoting the business: Original Wire (Auburn Hills, MI) and Happy Lucky Assemblies (HLA) of Guangdong Province, China. The estimated demand for the harnesses is 5,000 units a month. Both suppliers will incur some costs to retool for this particular harness. The harnesses will be prepackaged in 24 12 6-inch cartons. Each packaged unit weighs approximately 10 pounds. Quote 1 The first quote received is from Original Wire. Auburn Hills is about 20 miles from Autolinks corporate headquarters, so the quote was delivered in person. When Sheila went down to the lobby, she was greeted by the sales agent and an engineering representative. After the quote was handed over, the sales agent noted that engineering would be happy to work closely with Autolink in developing the unit and would also be interested in future business that might involve finding ways to reduce costs. The sales agent also noted that they were hungry for business, as they were losing a lot of customers to companies from China. The quote included unit price, tooling, and packaging. The quoted unit price does not include shipping costs. Original Wire requires no special warehousing of inventory, and daily deliveries from its manufacturing site directly to Autolinks assembly operations are possible. Original Wire Quote: Unit price = 30 Packing costs = 0.75 per unit Tooling = 6,000 one-time fixed charge Freight cost = 5.20 per hundred pounds Quote 2 The second quote received is from Happy Lucky Assemblies of Guangdong Province, China. The supplier must pack the harnesses in a container and ship via inland transportation to the port of Shanghai in China, have the shipment transferred to a container ship, ship material to Seattle, and then have material transported inland to Detroit. The quoted unit price does not include international shipping costs, which the buyer will assume. HLA Quote: Unit price = 19.50 Shipping lead time = Eight weeks Tooling = 3,000 In addition to the suppliers quote, Sheila must consider additional costs and information before preparing a comparison of the Chinese suppliers quotation: Each monthly shipment requires three 40-foot containers. Packing costs for containerization = 2 per unit. Cost of inland transportation to port of export = 200 per container. Freight forwarders fee = 100 per shipment (letter of credit, documentation, etc.). Cost of ocean transport = 4,000 per container. This has risen significantly in recent years due to a shortage of ocean freight capacity. Marine insurance = 0.50 per 100 of shipment. U.S. port handling charges = 1,200 per container. This fee has also risen considerably this year, due to increased security. Ports have also been complaining that the charges may increase in the future. Customs duty = 5% of unit cost. Customs broker fees per shipment = 300. Transportation from Seattle to Detroit = 18.60 per hundred pounds. Need to warehouse at least four weeks of inventory in Detroit at a warehousing cost of 1.00 per cubic foot per month, to compensate for lead time uncertainty. Sheila must also figure the costs associated with committing corporate capital for holding inventory. She has spoken to some accountants, who typically use a corporate cost of capital rate of 15%. Cost of hedging currencybroker fees = 400 per shipment Additional administrative time due to international shipping = 4 hours per shipment 25 per hour (estimated) At least two five-day visits per year to travel to China to meet with supplier and provide updates on performance and shipping = 20,000 per year (estimated) The international sourcing costs must be absorbed by Sheila, as the supplier does not assume any of the additional estimated costs and invoice Sheila later, or build the costs into a revised unit price. Sheila feels that the U.S. supplier is probably less expensive, even though it quoted a higher price. Sheila also knows that this is a standard technology that is unlikely to change during the next three years, but which could be a contract that extends multiple years out. There is also a lot of hall talk amongst the engineers on her floor about next-generation automotive electronics, which will completely eliminate the need for wire harnesses, which will be replaced by electronic components that are smaller, lighter, and more reliable. She is unsure about how to calculate the total costs for each option, and she is even more unsure about how to factor these other variables into the decision. Based on the total cost per unit, which supplier should Sheila recommend?
The Global Sourcing Wire Harness Decision Sheila Austin, a buyer at Autolink, a Detroit-based producer of subassemblies for the automotive market, has sent out requests for quotations for a wiring harness to four prospective suppliers. Only two of the four suppliers indicated an interest in quoting the business: Original Wire (Auburn Hills, MI) and Happy Lucky Assemblies (HLA) of Guangdong Province, China. The estimated demand for the harnesses is 5,000 units a month. Both suppliers will incur some costs to retool for this particular harness. The harnesses will be prepackaged in 24 12 6-inch cartons. Each packaged unit weighs approximately 10 pounds. Quote 1 The first quote received is from Original Wire. Auburn Hills is about 20 miles from Autolinks corporate headquarters, so the quote was delivered in person. When Sheila went down to the lobby, she was greeted by the sales agent and an engineering representative. After the quote was handed over, the sales agent noted that engineering would be happy to work closely with Autolink in developing the unit and would also be interested in future business that might involve finding ways to reduce costs. The sales agent also noted that they were hungry for business, as they were losing a lot of customers to companies from China. The quote included unit price, tooling, and packaging. The quoted unit price does not include shipping costs. Original Wire requires no special warehousing of inventory, and daily deliveries from its manufacturing site directly to Autolinks assembly operations are possible. Original Wire Quote: Unit price = 30 Packing costs = 0.75 per unit Tooling = 6,000 one-time fixed charge Freight cost = 5.20 per hundred pounds Quote 2 The second quote received is from Happy Lucky Assemblies of Guangdong Province, China. The supplier must pack the harnesses in a container and ship via inland transportation to the port of Shanghai in China, have the shipment transferred to a container ship, ship material to Seattle, and then have material transported inland to Detroit. The quoted unit price does not include international shipping costs, which the buyer will assume. HLA Quote: Unit price = 19.50 Shipping lead time = Eight weeks Tooling = 3,000 In addition to the suppliers quote, Sheila must consider additional costs and information before preparing a comparison of the Chinese suppliers quotation: Each monthly shipment requires three 40-foot containers. Packing costs for containerization = 2 per unit. Cost of inland transportation to port of export = 200 per container. Freight forwarders fee = 100 per shipment (letter of credit, documentation, etc.). Cost of ocean transport = 4,000 per container. This has risen significantly in recent years due to a shortage of ocean freight capacity. Marine insurance = 0.50 per 100 of shipment. U.S. port handling charges = 1,200 per container. This fee has also risen considerably this year, due to increased security. Ports have also been complaining that the charges may increase in the future. Customs duty = 5% of unit cost. Customs broker fees per shipment = 300. Transportation from Seattle to Detroit = 18.60 per hundred pounds. Need to warehouse at least four weeks of inventory in Detroit at a warehousing cost of 1.00 per cubic foot per month, to compensate for lead time uncertainty. Sheila must also figure the costs associated with committing corporate capital for holding inventory. She has spoken to some accountants, who typically use a corporate cost of capital rate of 15%. Cost of hedging currencybroker fees = 400 per shipment Additional administrative time due to international shipping = 4 hours per shipment 25 per hour (estimated) At least two five-day visits per year to travel to China to meet with supplier and provide updates on performance and shipping = 20,000 per year (estimated) The international sourcing costs must be absorbed by Sheila, as the supplier does not assume any of the additional estimated costs and invoice Sheila later, or build the costs into a revised unit price. Sheila feels that the U.S. supplier is probably less expensive, even though it quoted a higher price. Sheila also knows that this is a standard technology that is unlikely to change during the next three years, but which could be a contract that extends multiple years out. There is also a lot of hall talk amongst the engineers on her floor about next-generation automotive electronics, which will completely eliminate the need for wire harnesses, which will be replaced by electronic components that are smaller, lighter, and more reliable. She is unsure about how to calculate the total costs for each option, and she is even more unsure about how to factor these other variables into the decision. Calculate the total cost per unit of purchasing from Happy Lucky Assemblies.
The Global Sourcing Wire Harness Decision Sheila Austin, a buyer at Autolink, a Detroit-based producer of subassemblies for the automotive market, has sent out requests for quotations for a wiring harness to four prospective suppliers. Only two of the four suppliers indicated an interest in quoting the business: Original Wire (Auburn Hills, MI) and Happy Lucky Assemblies (HLA) of Guangdong Province, China. The estimated demand for the harnesses is 5,000 units a month. Both suppliers will incur some costs to retool for this particular harness. The harnesses will be prepackaged in 24 12 6-inch cartons. Each packaged unit weighs approximately 10 pounds. Quote 1 The first quote received is from Original Wire. Auburn Hills is about 20 miles from Autolinks corporate headquarters, so the quote was delivered in person. When Sheila went down to the lobby, she was greeted by the sales agent and an engineering representative. After the quote was handed over, the sales agent noted that engineering would be happy to work closely with Autolink in developing the unit and would also be interested in future business that might involve finding ways to reduce costs. The sales agent also noted that they were hungry for business, as they were losing a lot of customers to companies from China. The quote included unit price, tooling, and packaging. The quoted unit price does not include shipping costs. Original Wire requires no special warehousing of inventory, and daily deliveries from its manufacturing site directly to Autolinks assembly operations are possible. Original Wire Quote: Unit price = 30 Packing costs = 0.75 per unit Tooling = 6,000 one-time fixed charge Freight cost = 5.20 per hundred pounds Quote 2 The second quote received is from Happy Lucky Assemblies of Guangdong Province, China. The supplier must pack the harnesses in a container and ship via inland transportation to the port of Shanghai in China, have the shipment transferred to a container ship, ship material to Seattle, and then have material transported inland to Detroit. The quoted unit price does not include international shipping costs, which the buyer will assume. HLA Quote: Unit price = 19.50 Shipping lead time = Eight weeks Tooling = 3,000 In addition to the suppliers quote, Sheila must consider additional costs and information before preparing a comparison of the Chinese suppliers quotation: Each monthly shipment requires three 40-foot containers. Packing costs for containerization = 2 per unit. Cost of inland transportation to port of export = 200 per container. Freight forwarders fee = 100 per shipment (letter of credit, documentation, etc.). Cost of ocean transport = 4,000 per container. This has risen significantly in recent years due to a shortage of ocean freight capacity. Marine insurance = 0.50 per 100 of shipment. U.S. port handling charges = 1,200 per container. This fee has also risen considerably this year, due to increased security. Ports have also been complaining that the charges may increase in the future. Customs duty = 5% of unit cost. Customs broker fees per shipment = 300. Transportation from Seattle to Detroit = 18.60 per hundred pounds. Need to warehouse at least four weeks of inventory in Detroit at a warehousing cost of 1.00 per cubic foot per month, to compensate for lead time uncertainty. Sheila must also figure the costs associated with committing corporate capital for holding inventory. She has spoken to some accountants, who typically use a corporate cost of capital rate of 15%. Cost of hedging currencybroker fees = 400 per shipment Additional administrative time due to international shipping = 4 hours per shipment 25 per hour (estimated) At least two five-day visits per year to travel to China to meet with supplier and provide updates on performance and shipping = 20,000 per year (estimated) The international sourcing costs must be absorbed by Sheila, as the supplier does not assume any of the additional estimated costs and invoice Sheila later, or build the costs into a revised unit price. Sheila feels that the U.S. supplier is probably less expensive, even though it quoted a higher price. Sheila also knows that this is a standard technology that is unlikely to change during the next three years, but which could be a contract that extends multiple years out. There is also a lot of hall talk amongst the engineers on her floor about next-generation automotive electronics, which will completely eliminate the need for wire harnesses, which will be replaced by electronic components that are smaller, lighter, and more reliable. She is unsure about how to calculate the total costs for each option, and she is even more unsure about how to factor these other variables into the decision. Are there any other issues besides cost that Sheila should evaluate?
Ay 1 - mcq Company X and Company Y Ahrens Vitamins. Inc., have high market commonality, both geographically and in the market segments in which they compete. Company X, the number two firm in the industry, has undertaken a major strategic attack upon Company Y, the market leader. Which of the following statements is MOST likely to be true? A. Company Y will respond after a long delay as the nutrition supplement industry is a slow-cycle industry. B. As the market leader, Company Y has little to fear from an attack by Company X and will not expend organizational slack ana major response. C. Company Y will respond aggressively because of the high multimarket contact between both companies. D. Company Y will not respond aggressively since this is a strategic move and not a tactical action.
The Cebu Pacific Group is a Filipino airline group headquartered in Manila that operates subsidiary low cost-carriers; Cebu Pacific and Cebgo. The group aims to create the largest budget airline network between Asia and the Philippines. CEBU AIR Inc., The listed operator of budget carrier Cebu Pacific, faced some devastating financial losses on its operations during the pandemic due to the “heavy impact” of the global health crisis. In the years prior, the company has recorded billions of increasing income before tax, however, 2020 is a different story. In the said year, the company’s total revenues dropped along with the number of passengers it carried and the number of flights it directed. In the early months of 2021, Cebu Air announced that its board of directors had approved the company’s employee long-term incentive plan.Cebu Air would allocate up to a total of 2% of its issued and outstanding common shares to be granted to “eligible employees.” The purpose of the plan was to…
Air Asia is a low-cost airline operating primarily in Asia. It was the first airline in Asia to operate under the low fare no-frills model first introduced in Europe. Air Asia enjoyed for quite a while some success in a very competitive industry where many firms have failed. This case considers Air Asia’s development, its business model, and the reactions of some of its competitors. The objective is to use Porter’s Five Forces Model and seek to evaluate if Air Asia’s success is sustainable in the market it has defined for itself. What competitive advantages does Air Asia enjoy at the time of this case? Do you think these advantages are sustainable?
Kantanka Limited is a family-owned automobile manufacturer with origin in Agona Swedru in the Central Region of Ghana. Kantanka Limited manufactures and sells saloon cars, trucks, SUVs, and trailers with related accessories. The Company is the current market leader, but is considering outsourcing their automobile production to increase margins. A large scale outsourcing move would be a first for the industry, and the Company wants to know if this is a worthwhile proposition. There are two options being explored: (i) full outsourcing an automobile manufacturing plant in China; (ii) outsourcing final production in Ivory Coast with parts provided from China. You are free to use relevant diagrams/frameworks/figures in supporting your answers to the questions below What could be the problem(s) justifying the outsourcing decision? Should the Company outsource their automobile production and why? Which outsourcing option is the optimal choice? Your response should engage with the criteria…
Kantanka Limited is a family-owned automobile manufacturer with origin in Agona Swedru in the Central Region of Ghana. Kantanka Limited manufactures and sells saloon cars, trucks, SUVs, and trailers with related accessories. The Company is the current market leader, but is considering outsourcing their automobile production to increase margins. A large scale outsourcing move would be a first for the industry, and the Company wants to know if this is a worthwhile proposition. There are two options being explored: (i) full outsourcing an automobile manufacturing plant in China; (ii) outsourcing final production in Ivory Coast with parts provided from China. You are free to use relevant diagrams/frameworks/figures in supporting your answers to the questions below NOTE; PLEASE I NEED A DIFFERENT VIEW OR ANSWER APART FROM THE PREVIOUS ANSWER GIVEN. What could be the problem(s) justifying the outsourcing decision? Should the Company outsource their automobile production and why? Which…
Kantanka Limited is a family-owned automobile manufacturer with origin in Agona Swedru in the Central Region of Ghana. Kantanka Limited manufactures and sells saloon cars, trucks, SUVs, and trailers with related accessories. The Company is the current market leader, but is considering outsourcing their automobile production to increase margins. A large scale outsourcing move would be a first for the industry, and the Company wants to know if this is a worthwhile proposition. There are two options being explored: (i) full outsourcing an automobile manufacturing plant in China; (ii) outsourcing final production in Ivory Coast with parts provided from China. You are free to use relevant diagrams/frameworks/figures in supporting your answers to the questions below a. What could be the problem(s) justifying the outsourcing decision? b. Should the Company outsource their automobile production and why? c. Which outsourcing option is the optimal choice? Your response should engage with the…