Decide in each of the following instances whether the statement is true or false and motivate your answer. 1. The courts shall apply customary law principles. The only requirement is that the parties to the matter must have requested the court to apply these principles. 2. An advertisement is a valid offer.

Decide in each of the following instances whether the statement is true or false and motivate your answer. 1. The courts shall apply customary law principles. The only requirement is that the parties to the matter must have requested the court to apply these principles. 2. An advertisement is a valid offer.

Principles Of Marketing

17th Edition

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Jeb is a licensee who wishes to sell his own home. He isn't sure if he should include the fact that he is a license holder in his advertisements. As Jeb's broker, you tell him that: "You are not required to include that you are a license holder in your ad and you must never verbally disclose your status as a license holder." "You are required by law to include that you are a license holder in your ad." "You are not allowed to say that you are a license holder when selling your own home." "You are not required to include that you are a license holder in your ad, but I recommend that you disclose that information to potential
1. Wong, a Mathematics teacher made an advertisement in her facebook for Mathematics tuition with a ‘Money back guarantee for those who did not get an “A” in the SPM examination”. Shah enrolled his daughter, Teyha to Wong’s tuition class. When Teyha sat for the SPM examination, she obtained a “B” for her Mathematics paper. Shah went to see Wong and demanded that he return the tuition fees that he paid him. Wong refuses to return the fees to Shah. a. Advise Shah in this matters. b. In the course of your answer, explain FOUR (4) situations that may lead to invitation to treat. Support your answers with Contracts Act 1950 and decided cases.
Which of the following statements is TRUE about an entrenching provision? Group of answer choices It must be altered by at least 75% of members present and voting. It can be amended by following the provisions of S.26(1) of the Companies Act. It can never be removed. It must be amended with the approval of all members.
What is the contra proferentum rule and how does this apply to exclusion clauses? Which of the following is correct? The contra proferentum rule applies so that an exclusion clause is always interpreted by a court against the party relying on it The contra proferentum rule basically means that an exclusion clause is contrary to the interests of consumers and therefore unenforceable as a term Contra proferentum refers to the ability of consumer law to set a contrary term to that of the parties within a contract The contra proferentum rule means that the party relying on the exclusion clause must be able to prove that the other party agreed to it, otherwise it is not enforceable
second answer of part b
What is the Parol Evidence Rule? Please describe one circumstance in which you believe the rule should be followed and why? Please describe a circumstance in which you believe the rule should not be followed and why? Please not, this is business law question. Thank you.
L.L. Bean sends a catalogue to Olivia. A letter addressed to Olivia is attached to the cover of the catalogue. In the letter, the CEO of the company invites Olivia to buy any item in the catalogue at the listed price. This is a. an offer because there is no room for price negotiation. b. not an offer. c. an offer because of the letter. d. an offer only if Olivia previously bought items from L.L. Bean.
Bart Inc. developed a new medical rub called “NoPain Muscular Rub” that can be used in the event of muscular back pains. Bart Inc. via an online advertisement, stated that they are willing to pay $5,000 to anyone who used their muscle rub “Nopain” for one week and still suffers with back pains thereafter. Bill who suffer from back pains, saw the online advertisement and decided to purchase “NoPain Muscular Rub”. He used it for a full week, but nevertheless still suffered from back pains. Based on the fact that the muscular rub “Nopain” did not relieve his back pains, he sued Bart Inc. for the monies that were promised. However, Bart Inc. argued that the advertisement was not an offer, but an invitation to invite offers. They further argued that at no point in time did Bill make an offer and as such, they are not bound to pay him any monies, since the parties did not create any binding agreement. Advised Bill on his legal options using the IRAC model
Bart Inc. developed a new medical rub called “NoPain Muscular Rub” that can be used in the event of muscular back pains. Bart Inc. via an online advertisement, stated that they are willing to pay $5,000 to anyone who used their muscle rub “Nopain” for one week and still suffers with back pains thereafter. Bill who suffer from back pains, saw the online advertisement and decided to purchase “NoPain Muscular Rub”. He used it for a full week, but nevertheless still suffered from back pains. Based on the fact that the muscular rub “Nopain” did not relieve his back pains, he sued Bart Inc. for the monies that were promised. However, Bart Inc. argued that the advertisement was not an offer, but an invitation to invite offers. They further argued that at no point in time did Bill make an offer and as such, they are not bound to pay him any monies, since the parties did not create any binding agreement. Advised Bill on his legal options using IRAC
Bart Inc. developed a new medical rub called “NoPain Muscular Rub” that can be used in the event of muscular back pains. Bart Inc. via an online advertisement stated that they are willing to pay $5,000 to anyone who used their muscle rub “Nopain” for one week and still suffers from back pains thereafter. Bill who suffers from back pains, saw the online advertisement and decided to purchase “NoPain Muscular Rub”. He used it for a full week, but nevertheless still suffered from back pains. Based on the fact that the muscular rub “Nopain” did not relieve his back pains, he sued Bart Inc. for the monies that were promised. However, Bart Inc. argued that the advertisement was not an offer, but an invitation to invite offers. They further argued that at no point in time did Bill make an offer and as such, they are not bound to pay him any monies, since the parties did not create any binding agreement. Advised Bill on his legal options stating relevant case law as well as using the IRAC…
According to the case FTC v Standard Education, Question 11 options: The Court advocated a change of standard from the ignorant-consumer standard to the reasonable-person standard The Court set a precedent that unless an advertisement makes a obviously false claim, an advertisement is not deceptive The Court advocated a change of standard from the reasonable-person standard to the gullible-consumer standard The rule of caveat emptor should be the guiding principle in deciding consumer fraud cases
Employees are prohibited from receiving any form of payments, gifts, favor, or use of services or entertainment or gratuities given by third parties that may compromise our integrity or affect our business judgment. Which of the following topic in the Code covers the above? (I) Conflict of Interest (II) Receiving and Giving Business Courtesy (III) Business Dealings With Others (IV) Embracing Good Practice (V) Purchasing & Procurement