Efficiency of an ESP is a function of the flue gas characteristics (temperature and moisture), electrical resistivity of the particle and particle size, can be estimated by the Deutsch-Anderson equation: η = 1 − exp (−Aw/Q) Calculate the efficiency of ESP has a specific area of collection plate as 100 m2, drift velocity 1 m/s and flow rate of flue gas as 40 m/s.

Efficiency of an ESP is a function of the flue gas characteristics (temperature and moisture), electrical resistivity of the particle and particle size, can be estimated by the Deutsch-Anderson equation: η = 1 − exp (−Aw/Q) Calculate the efficiency of ESP has a specific area of collection plate as 100 m2, drift velocity 1 m/s and flow rate of flue gas as 40 m/s.

Sustainable Energy

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781337551663

Author:DUNLAP, Richard A.

Publisher:DUNLAP, Richard A.

Chapter14: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion And Ocean Salinity Gradient Energy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A settling chamber is to be used to collect particles with a density of 1200 kg/m3 from an air stream at 1.013 bars and 350 degrees kelvin. The volume flow rate is 2 m3/s. The overall chamber is 2.5m high, 3m wide. (a) What is the value of Re for the gas flow (b) How long a chamber is required for 85 percent removal efficiency of 60 micrometers diameter particles
A settling tank having a depth of 3.5 m and surface area of 1000 m2 is used to remove particles of size 0.01 mm and specific gravity of 2.7. Calculate the removal percentage of the tank for a discharge of 7000 m3/d. Take viscosity of water as 10-3 kg/m.s.
A flue gas contains mainly 15 micron sized particles (density 2000 kg/m3) to be removed by a cyclone collector. The body diameter is assumed to be 0.8m. A high efficiency mode is desired. The inletvelocity is 15 m/s with a density of 1.225 kg/m3. What is the efficiency of removal of the 15 micron sized particles?
For a completely mixed activated sludge reactor treating municipal wastewater, we can assume the following kinetic and operating parameters: Maximum specific growth rate (μmax) = 3 day-1 Yield = 0.6 mass cells/mass BOD5 utilized Half-velocity coefficient (KS) = 200 mg/L Decay coefficient (KD) = 0.06 day-1 Influent substrate concentration (S0) = 400 mg/L MCRT = 5 days Reactor volume = 3 ML (million liters) Wastewater flow rate (Q) = 10 MLD (million liters per day) Returned activated sludge flow rate (QR) = 5 MLD Calculate the substrate concentration in the effluent (S), cell concentration in the reactor (X), sludge production rate (QWXW), hydraulic retention time (θH), waste sludge flow rate (QW), F/M ratio, and clarifier size.
A landfill that is 12 ha in area has a liner of thickness 0.9 m. Each year 1700 m3 of leachate is collected. The hydraulic conductivity ofthe liner is 3.9 × 10-10 m · s-1. What is the head of water above the liner? Select one: a. 2 m b. 3 m c. 1 m d. 4 m
5. A stream has a cross-sectional area of A= 85 m2, length L = 1000 m, velocity U=185 m/hour, containing BOD with a concentration of 10 g/m3. At one point, the river receives a waste stream with a discharge of 100 m3/hour and a BOD concentration of 100 g/m3 where the reaction rate of BOD k = 2/hour. If the rate of diffusion is 2085 m^2/hour, determine: General solution of the BOD concentration function in a steady state stream.
A wastewater treatment plant processes its mixed sludge by employing the gravity thickening followed by anaerobic digestion. The thickened sludge has a flowrate of 4,000 m³/d at a solids content of 5% and must be conveyed over a 100m-long pipeline (Hazen-William coefficient C = 100) between the gravity thickeners and anaerobic digesters. Size the diameter of the pipe and estimate the friction headloss using both simple multiplication factor method and rheological method, respectively.
An ESP was designed to treat 5500 m3/mm of flue gas from a coal combustion unit and achieve a 98,5% PM removal efficiency. A certain drift velocity was assumed. The unit was built with exactly the collect ion. area called for in the design, but by the time the unit was started up, the actual flow rate had increased to 5900 m3/min, and the actual efficiency was really 98,5%,. Was the actual drift velocity the same as had been assumed? Prove your answer mathematically.
An ESP is treating the flue gas from a coal combustion unit and achieving a 97% PM removal efficiency. Suddenly the efficiency drops to 92%, but the gas flow rate has remained exactly the same. Udder the old conditions (while achieving 97% efficiency), the fly-ash resistivity was measured at 3.16 (10)10 ohxn-cm. Estimate the value of the new drift velocity ,m/min.
The gauge pressure reading under a settling tank is 57 78 kilopascal. The settling tank has a radius of 4.2 meters Calculate the height of the fuel inside given that its SG is 0.88 MT/m 3
Calculate the collection efficiency of a venturi scrubber for 1-pm particles if the operating conditions are
the value of oil is - 0.8 asap 15 mins